Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 01/03: Efl.Ui.Format: implement generic format_string function

2017-10-27 11:12 GMT+09:00 Amitesh Singh : > Hello, > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri < > barbi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Amitesh Singh > > wrote: > > > > thanks for the improvement,

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 01/03: Efl.Ui.Format: implement generic format_string function

Hello, On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri < barbi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Amitesh Singh > wrote: > > thanks for the improvement, but one hint I said before went unnoticed > and would save great deal of this

Re: [E-devel] Enlightenment DR 0.22.0-beta Release

On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:29:36 + Mike Blumenkrantz said: actually settings -> extensions -> shelves lets you access all the core shelf config (size, positioning, fill screen edge or not, content). the only thing you can't do is move gadgets around within a shelf

Re: [E-devel] GitFlow

On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 19:02:58 +0200 marcel-hollerb...@t-online.de said: > Two things, > > Calling efl-master unmanagable and unrunable is just spreading a > apocalyptic mood and does not really tell what is going on. There are I absolutely agree. I and many others use master all day every day.

Re: [E-devel] GitFlow

On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 13:38:12 +0100 Tom Hacohen said: > I accidentally hit send, didn't mean to. > Here is my full reply: > It's possible, yes, but it doesn't address my initial concerns, which > are that edi will stick out compared to the other e projects. This > will be

Re: [E-devel] GitFlow

On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:35:39 +0100 Tom Hacohen said: > Intended to be would maybe be more appropriate, and then the statement > would still apply. With that being said, I'm sorry to hear that it has > changed, you guys should be spanking b0rokers more, don't let them > win. > >

Re: [E-devel] GitFlow

On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:14:14 + Mike Blumenkrantz said: > 'Our master is already considered "stable" and in a release state, so it > really doesn't match our workflow.' > > Things have changed a bit since you've been gone, and this is not even > remotely close

Re: [E-devel] GitFlow

Two things, Calling efl-master unmanagable and unrunable is just spreading a apocalyptic mood and does not really tell what is going on. There are bugs and a few crashes, yes, but the same happened a few years back when i started with efl stuff. (Also, how can you call efl master unstable if you

Re: [E-devel] GitFlow

I haven't run efl master in a long time, and I know there are others who have stopped running it for the same reasons that I have. I am not necessarily advocating changing to gitflow, but several years of the current development methodology has definitely proven that it is unmanageable and that

Re: [E-devel] GitFlow

Intended to be would maybe be more appropriate, and then the statement would still apply. With that being said, I'm sorry to hear that it has changed, you guys should be spanking b0rokers more, don't let them win. Regardless of that, as said on IRC, the reason why we do trunk (master) based

Re: [E-devel] GitFlow

'Our master is already considered "stable" and in a release state, so it really doesn't match our workflow.' Things have changed a bit since you've been gone, and this is not even remotely close to being true anymore. As far as all of my use cases go (everyday use on X, testing on Wayland, basic

Re: [E-devel] Enlightenment DR 0.22.0-beta Release

Then, if it's a single-finger only device the user will face the same problems they had with a shelf--ideally a profile will be available which suits the user's taste--or they will rebind right click (two finger click) to trigger the menu action. On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 7:45 PM Carsten Haitzler

Re: [E-devel] GitFlow

I accidentally hit send, didn't mean to. Here is my full reply: It's possible, yes, but it doesn't address my initial concerns, which are that edi will stick out compared to the other e projects. This will be considered a success by you for sure, and I don't see us changing the efl to follow, so

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 01/03: Efl.Ui.Format: implement generic format_string function

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Amitesh Singh wrote: thanks for the improvement, but one hint I said before went unnoticed and would save great deal of this implementation: > +typedef struct > +{ > + const char *template; > +} Efl_Ui_Format_Data; this is already

Re: [E-devel] GitFlow

It is possible, yes. On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 07:19:51 + Andrew Williams > said: > >> Hi, >> >> You are absolutely right - the “show it with a smaller project and prove >> it’s worth is

Re: [E-devel] API docs

Hi, I'm not sure what else to look at. Everything works fine on my local dokuwiki... What else has changed or is different with our server? Thanks, Andy On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 at 11:00 Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 07:48:38 + Andrew Williams

Re: [E-devel] API docs

On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 07:48:38 + Andrew Williams said: > Ouch. > > That marking up issue seems to have poisoned the cache for a few pages - > can someone with access to the server please reset the dokuwiki cache? it's not the cache... i wiped that... it's something else

Re: [E-devel] GitFlow

On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 07:19:51 + Andrew Williams said: > Hi, > > You are absolutely right - the “show it with a smaller project and prove > it’s worth is exactly why I brought it up. I was in the process of doing so > and hit this roadblock. No intention to beat a dead

Re: [E-devel] API docs

On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 07:48:38 + Andrew Williams said: > Ouch. > > That marking up issue seems to have poisoned the cache for a few pages - > can someone with access to the server please reset the dokuwiki cache? it's the cache? really? u... odd... > Thanks, >

Re: [E-devel] API docs

Ouch. That marking up issue seems to have poisoned the cache for a few pages - can someone with access to the server please reset the dokuwiki cache? Thanks, Andy On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 at 02:57 Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 08:54:26 +0900 Carsten Haitzler

Re: [E-devel] GitFlow

Hi, You are absolutely right - the “show it with a smaller project and prove it’s worth is exactly why I brought it up. I was in the process of doing so and hit this roadblock. No intention to beat a dead horse - I actually thought I was doing what was agreed. Apologies if I got the wrong end of