On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 03:13:36PM -0800, Patrick R. Wade wrote:
The most utterly hosed filesystem i have ever had the misfortune to
be afflicted with, came to me courtesy of softupdates.
The enormous files with the immutable flag set, the files with negative
timestamps, the files with
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 08:46:39PM -0800, T. Joseph Carter wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 07:43:58PM -0801, Jacob Meuser wrote:
Yes, that's what he meant.
Now what would be cool is a journaled file system for bsd. Any one out
there? Perhaps when bsd supports xfs, reiser or ext3.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:49:33PM -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
Softdep makes fsck _very_ reliable,
The most utterly hosed filesystem i have ever had the misfortune to
be afflicted with, came to me courtesy of softupdates.
The enormous files with the immutable flag set, the files with negative
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 03:16:16PM -0800, Patrick R. Wade wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:49:33PM -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
Softdep makes fsck _very_ reliable,
The most utterly hosed filesystem i have ever had the misfortune to
be afflicted with, came to me courtesy of softupdates.
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 06:56:40PM -0800, Robert M. Solovay wrote:
Larry,
I'm guessing you meant to say that you can mount the UFS
filesystem from Linux. Is this right?
Yes, that's what he meant.
Now what would be cool is a journaled file system for bsd. Any one out
there? Perhaps
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:16:36PM -0800, Cory Petkovsek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 06:56:40PM -0800, Robert M. Solovay wrote:
Larry,
I'm guessing you meant to say that you can mount the UFS
filesystem from Linux. Is this right?
Yes, that's what he meant.
Now what would be
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 07:43:58PM -0801, Jacob Meuser wrote:
Yes, that's what he meant.
Now what would be cool is a journaled file system for bsd. Any one out
there? Perhaps when bsd supports xfs, reiser or ext3.
Probably won't ever happen. UFS/FFS has been around for ages. Many
I've read the FTM and I'm still not sure. I *think* that the filesystems
used by FreeBSD are different from the ext2 system used by linux so I
couldn't have the two OS's coexisting and reading the same home directory.
But I couldn't find any explicit discussion of this point in the FreeBSD
bsd's all use the UFS filesystem
derived from 4.2 BSD
You can mount ext2 from FreeBSD
and you can mount UFS filesystems from BSD
obstacles to cooperation are less daunting than you might think.
read the man pages for mount, newfs and fsck
to get the gory details.
On Monday, February 2, 2004, at
Larry,
I'm guessing you meant to say that you can mount the UFS
filesystem from Linux. Is this right?
At any rate, thanks very much for the quick and informative reply.
--Bob Solovay
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Larry Price wrote:
bsd's all use the UFS filesystem
derived from 4.2
10 matches
Mail list logo
