On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 04:44:20PM -0800, Marc Baber wrote:
I would say that spam, or at least the set of e-mails that one might
want to be classified as spam, is *not* the same for everybody, in the
case of politically motivated spam filtering. Because the corpus body
of collected spam
Larry Price wrote:
spamassassin is a filtering solution analogous to using a pitchfork
on a river in flood, it's effective at moving debris out of the way,
but it's not exactly selective...
My question about all this is, does spamassassin's Bayesian
component use per-user filter tables or a
Larry Price wrote:
The current setup is not the final setup, we are currently moving
towards per user whitelists
but the Bayesian filter is probably most useful as a global weight. The
trend I notice being that spam is generally more similar than
different, otherwise every one's filter
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:00:22PM -0800, Bob Miller wrote:
Maybe I should give a EUGLUG talk on setting up bogofilter for
personal use. I'd need some help from someone who understands POP and
IMAP -- I still use /var/spool/mail/$USER as my mail queue.
fetchmail
or
mozilla mail = 1.4 which
I *love* mozilla mail, esp 1.5, although I don't use it myself at this
point. I've set it up for a number of folks, here at my day job and
elsewhere, and everyone likes it. One thing I've noted is that you have
to go into the spam filter config in the Tools menu, to tell it to dump
your
I would say that spam, or at least the set of e-mails that one might
want to be classified as spam, is *not* the same for everybody, in the
case of politically motivated spam filtering. Because the corpus body
of collected spam e-mails is used to filter e-mail for all users, one
person's spam
On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 03:02 PM, Marc Baber wrote:
Please forgive me for singling you (Larry) out as the expert on the
subject of [EMAIL PROTECTED], but you've been very helpful on the topic more than
once in the past and I suspect you're our best hope of finding
answers to a
