Hi, Allen,
I was a typographer for 20-some years before a midlife career change,
so keeping an eye on the state of the art is a hobby.
I think it important that before deciding on a solution, you determine
what format(s) will be required by the folks who do the final
typographical production
If you do a presentation in Google Docs, Power Point for example, you
can use images.
As long as you trust your collaborators, you may make the links private
to a degree in each document's sharing settings. It can be very bulky,
but a nice way to exclude information is to have a global doc with
Can we please not get spam in here? Maybe we can get a vote to remove
said spammer from the list. Not cool at all in my opinion. Leaving links for
get rich quick schemes is never alright.
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
I forgot, uploading a PDF also gets you images with Google Docs. For example,
here's our local ham radio club newsletter:
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=vpid=explorerchrome=truesrcid=0B4g_J4lkPJMWMjhhMDY1ZTAtOTg4MS00ODkwLTgxNjctYWRhYmE1YjIyNjlmhl=en_US
--Kaplan
Melita! domi adsum.
Honey!
So, a few questions:
1. Do you require real-time collaboration?
2. Is obscurity enough security for your images (and document as a whole)?
2a. Could you use screen-quality image versions for the composition of the
work, and swap in print-quality ones later?
3. Does your solution need to be
Thank you. I will take a look.
Another problem I ran into with Google Docs was the user agreement.
Specifically section 11.1 where it says they have permanent
irrevocable rights to publish my works. We decided that was a
deal killer.
I admit I'm a bit hazy on the formatting requirements. I
- Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com wrote:
So, a few questions:
1. Do you require real-time collaboration?
I don't think so.
2. Is obscurity enough security for your images (and document as a
whole)?
I think so.
2a. Could you use screen-quality image versions for the composition of
