On 16 Nov 2014, at 08:45, LizR wrote:
On 16 November 2014 07:42, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:39 PM, zibb...@gmail.com wrote:
The idea that computers are people has a long and storied history.
I would maintain that from a long term operational viewpoint
On 16 Nov 2014, at 05:06, zibb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, November 16, 2014 2:48:33 AM UTC, zib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, November 15, 2014 10:55:45 PM UTC, Russell Standish
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 02:40:39PM -0800, zib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, November 14,
On 08 Nov 2014, at 04:55, LizR wrote:
On 8 November 2014 11:50, zibb...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, but in the same vein as where Peter goes, photosynthesis in
this universe always finds the most efficient path where there are
many others. I have'n't heard an answer to that yet, that addresses
On 15 Nov 2014, at 23:19, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:27:50PM -0800, Peter Sas wrote:
Hi Russell, thanks for your answer... I will definitely give your
book a
closer reading in the near future, if I can get my poor
philosopher's head
to understand the mathematics :)
On 15 Nov 2014, at 17:02, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
wrote:
Along these lines of thought, the universe splitting or
differentiation in MWI is said to be irreversible
even though the equation of QM are time reversible.
The Many
On 15 Nov 2014, at 13:44, Peter Sas wrote:
Haha... a glas of wine and a lie down seems like the appropriate
response either way!
But your response is clarifying... It's like the idea of the zero-
energy universe but in informational terms... The universe is
'substantially' nothing, and
On 14 Nov 2014, at 23:18, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 01:33:15PM -0500, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I will accept that information cannot be communicated faster
than the
speed of light. However, even in single
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 15 Nov 2014, at 17:02, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
wrote:
Along these lines of thought, the universe splitting or differentiation
in MWI is said to be
On 14 Nov 2014, at 23:14, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 01:33:15PM -0500, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I will accept that information
On 14 Nov 2014, at 23:35, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 05:14:24PM -0500, Richard Ruquist wrote:
But QM equations are time reversible, The differentiation of the
universe
is not
Your
On 14 Nov 2014, at 23:34, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 07:55:04PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Thinking on this, I begin to see more clearly the MW picture of
the singlet state. The explanation is not that obvious.
Let me proceed by giving an argument which seems to imply
On 15 Nov 2014, at 06:48, Samiya Illias wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 14 Nov 2014, at 13:33, Samiya Illias wrote:
On 14-Nov-2014, at 4:27 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 14 Nov 2014, at 11:18, Samiya Illias wrote:
On Sunday, November 16, 2014 11:08:04 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Nov 2014, at 05:06, zib...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
On Sunday, November 16, 2014 2:48:33 AM UTC, zib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, November 15, 2014 10:55:45 PM UTC, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Nov
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Latitudes and longitudes do not interfere.
Maybe Schrodinger's Wave Equation doesn't interfere either, only other
worlds do, and maybe the wave equation is just a way, and certainly not the
only way, humans have of
On 16 Nov 2014, at 03:31, Kim Jones wrote:
I wonder if by now it's worth considering in information-theoretic
terms how the evolution of academe tends to result in universes in
which most and possibly all information becomes increasingly self-
referential and redundant ie uncreative. I
On 17 November 2014 00:31, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Heisenberg was influenced by the positivism of the time (The Vienna
circles, the young Wittgenstein, etc.). That was very bad philosophy, and
we can say that is is virtually abandoned. Positivism is easily shown
self-defeating
On 11/16/2014 2:56 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Nov 2014, at 08:45, LizR wrote:
On 16 November 2014 07:42, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
mailto:johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:39 PM, zibb...@gmail.com
mailto:zibb...@gmail.com wrote:
The idea that
Interesting speculative physics. that makes claims that parallel worlds may
be testable.
A new theory, proposed by Howard Wiseman, Director of the Centre of Quantum
Dynamics at Griffith University, is different. No new universes are ever
created. Instead many worlds have existed, side-by-side,
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 12:42:51PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 Nov 2014, at 23:18, Russell Standish wrote:
I also like to point out that unitarity is also equivalent to
conservation of information, or in other words if something can
happen, it will happen, somewhere in the
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 02:13:51PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 Nov 2014, at 23:35, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Russell Standish
li...@hpcoders.com.au wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 05:14:24PM -0500, Richard Ruquist wrote:
But QM equations are time
The MWI can also be viewed as not positing that any new worlds are created,
but that the multiverse is a continuum that can differentiate between
previously identical worlds, and can continue to do this forever, that
being a property of a continuum.
How does Wiseman (appropriate name!)
If we can't interact with world 2, then its as if it doesn't exist. Just as if
there was a super civilization in the Sombrero Galaxy, but they can never
interact with us, nor we, with them. It resolves, from a human point of view to
Never-Never Land. On the other hand if we somehow can do FTL
On 17 Nov 2014, at 4:53 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 16 Nov 2014, at 03:31, Kim Jones wrote:
I wonder if by now it's worth considering in information-theoretic terms how
the evolution of academe tends to result in universes in which most and
possibly all information
Dear Russell,
I try to be polite and smooth in my communications not only with you. Here
a question emerges in my mind: how diffrent is your perception of the MV
(and the arising of such VERY human connotations) from the concept of 'GOD
in religious minds?
Is the Schroedinger equation stuff
Nice post, Bruno.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
Isn't that the sort of thing religious people often say? They try to use
their language applied to science.
You believe in evolution, I believe in the Bible. What's the difference?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe
On 11/16/2014 10:51 AM, LizR wrote:
On 17 November 2014 00:31, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
Heisenberg was influenced by the positivism of the time (The Vienna
circles, the
young Wittgenstein, etc.). That was very bad philosophy, and we can say
meekerdb wrote:
On 11/16/2014 10:51 AM, LizR wrote:
On 17 November 2014 00:31, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Heisenberg was influenced by the positivism of the time (The
Vienna circles, the young Wittgenstein, etc.). That was very bad
One advantage of supposing there are pre-existing worlds which are identical up the point
of differentiation is that it resolves the seeming paradox that an quantum measurement
that two outcomes with probabilities x and 1-x differentiates into two worlds when x=0.5
and ten worlds when x=0.1
On 11/16/2014 1:49 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 02:13:51PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 Nov 2014, at 23:35, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Russell Standish
li...@hpcoders.com.au wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 05:14:24PM -0500, Richard
On 11/16/2014 4:07 PM, LizR wrote:
Isn't that the sort of thing religious people often say? They try to use their language
applied to science.
You believe in evolution, I believe in the Bible. What's the difference?
Here's how a guy treats his religion with respect - he challenges it to
On 11/16/2014 7:15 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
meekerdb wrote:
On 11/16/2014 10:51 AM, LizR wrote:
On 17 November 2014 00:31, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Heisenberg was influenced by the positivism of the time (The
Vienna circles, the young
32 matches
Mail list logo
