Re: what chatGPT is and is not

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:32 AM Stathis Papaioannou wrote: > > > On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 14:23, Terren Suydam > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:14 AM Stathis Papaioannou >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 13:37, Terren Suydam >>> wrote: >>> On Mon, May

Re: what chatGPT is and is not

On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 14:40, Jesse Mazer wrote: > > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 11:37 PM Terren Suydam > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 11:13 PM Stathis Papaioannou >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 10:48, Terren Suydam >>> wrote: >>> On Mon, May 22,

Re: what chatGPT is and is not

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 11:37 PM Terren Suydam wrote: > > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 11:13 PM Stathis Papaioannou > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 10:48, Terren Suydam >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 8:42 PM Stathis Papaioannou >>> wrote: >>> On Tue,

Re: what chatGPT is and is not

On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 14:23, Terren Suydam wrote: > > > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:14 AM Stathis Papaioannou > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 13:37, Terren Suydam >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 11:13 PM Stathis Papaioannou >>> wrote: >>> On Tue, 23

Re: what chatGPT is and is not

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:14 AM Stathis Papaioannou wrote: > > > On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 13:37, Terren Suydam > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 11:13 PM Stathis Papaioannou >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 10:48, Terren Suydam >>> wrote: >>> On Mon, May

Re: what chatGPT is and is not

On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 13:37, Terren Suydam wrote: > > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 11:13 PM Stathis Papaioannou > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 10:48, Terren Suydam >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 8:42 PM Stathis Papaioannou >>> wrote: >>> On Tue, 23

Re: what chatGPT is and is not

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 11:13 PM Stathis Papaioannou wrote: > > > On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 10:48, Terren Suydam > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 8:42 PM Stathis Papaioannou >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 10:03, Terren Suydam >>> wrote: >>> it is true that

Re: what chatGPT is and is not

On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 10:48, Terren Suydam wrote: > > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 8:42 PM Stathis Papaioannou > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 10:03, Terren Suydam >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 7:34 PM Stathis Papaioannou >>> wrote: >>> On Tue, 23

Re: what chatGPT is and is not

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 8:42 PM Stathis Papaioannou wrote: > > > On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 10:03, Terren Suydam > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 7:34 PM Stathis Papaioannou >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 07:56, Terren Suydam >>> wrote: >>> Many, myself included,

Re: what chatGPT is and is not

On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 10:03, Terren Suydam wrote: > > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 7:34 PM Stathis Papaioannou > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 07:56, Terren Suydam >> wrote: >> >>> Many, myself included, are captivated by the amazing capabilities of >>> chatGPT and other LLMs. They

Re: what chatGPT is and is not

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 7:34 PM Stathis Papaioannou wrote: > > > On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 07:56, Terren Suydam > wrote: > >> Many, myself included, are captivated by the amazing capabilities of >> chatGPT and other LLMs. They are, truly, incredible. Depending on your >> definition of Turing Test,

Re: what chatGPT is and is not

On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 07:56, Terren Suydam wrote: > Many, myself included, are captivated by the amazing capabilities of > chatGPT and other LLMs. They are, truly, incredible. Depending on your > definition of Turing Test, it passes with flying colors in many, many > contexts. It would take a

what chatGPT is and is not

Many, myself included, are captivated by the amazing capabilities of chatGPT and other LLMs. They are, truly, incredible. Depending on your definition of Turing Test, it passes with flying colors in many, many contexts. It would take a much stricter Turing Test than we might have imagined this

Re: New laws of physics will not help us understand consciousness or how the brain works

On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 9:18 PM wrote: >*I can name 3 for ya. * > *1. Roger Penrose. Oxford, right?* > Wrong. About 25 years ago Roger Penrose suggested that microtubules inside of neurons might be involved in quantum computing (he didn't say how) which helped to tell the neuron when to fire,