Bruno Marchal wrote:
Colin,
I think we have always agreed on this conclusion. We may differ on the
premises.
It just happen that I am using a special hypothesis, which is very
common, but not so well understood, and which is the digital mechanist
hypothesis.
I think things are more subtle
On 14 Jun 2010, at 09:09, Colin Hales wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Colin,
I think we have always agreed on this conclusion. We may differ on
the premises.
It just happen that I am using a special hypothesis, which is very
common, but not so well understood, and which is the digital
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
You have added the UTM and its variants to the pile. Any of these could be
just as right as you think COMP is.
I have no idea about the truth status of Digital Mechanism, except nothing
in nature suggest it to be
Hi Jason,
On 14 Jun 2010, at 15:55, Jason Resch wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
You have added the UTM and its variants to the pile. Any of these
could be just as right as you think COMP is.
I have no idea about the truth status of
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Thanks for the link Colin. I will read it after the exams period. In
some trivial sense I think I, and the Lobian machine, agrees with your
conclusion, but less trivially, we may disagree. We don't have to
change the boundaries of science, just be more open to facts,
Colin,
I think we have always agreed on this conclusion. We may differ on the
premises.
It just happen that I am using a special hypothesis, which is very
common, but not so well understood, and which is the digital mechanist
hypothesis.
Then the discourse of the universal machine, which
Recently there was a student essay contest run by the ASSC (Association
for the Scientific Study of Consciousness)
The five winners are published in the ASSC journal PSYCHE.
One of them was mine. They have finally got around to publishing them.
Hales C. 2010. The scientific evidence of qualia
7 matches
Mail list logo
