1:24 am
Subject: Re: Thorium: the wonder fuel that wasn't
On 5/19/2014 9:30 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via
Everything List wrote:
Atthe risk of
re-starting the Thorium wars grin thisis a current
article on the why
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:40 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
A thorium, liquid salt reactor does make Pu239, and it gets a lot of
it's energy from Pu239 fission. The difference is that it essentially
burns the plutonium as fast at it's made.
From
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Quentin Anciaux
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 11:45 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Thorium: the wonder fuel that wasn't
2014-05-20 18:44 GMT+02:00 meekerdb meeke
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of meekerdb
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 1:13 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Thorium: the wonder fuel that wasn't
On 5/20/2014 11:45 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-05
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:30 AM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
At the risk of re-starting the Thorium wars grin this is a current
article on the why NOTS of Thorium. It addresses them point by point.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:52 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:30 AM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
At the risk of re-starting the Thorium wars grin this is a current
article on the why NOTS of Thorium.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:28 AM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
What about the waste tails he alludes to.
A Thorium reactor only produces about 1% as much waste as a conventional
reactor simply because Thorium has a atomic number of only 90 but
@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, May 20, 2014 1:24 am
Subject: Re: Thorium: the wonder fuel that wasn't
On 5/19/2014 9:30 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via
Everything List wrote:
Atthe risk of
re-starting the Thorium wars lt;gringt
Subject: Re: Thorium: the wonder fuel that wasn't
On 5/19/2014 9:30 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
At the risk of re-starting the Thorium wars grin this is a current article
on the why NOTS of Thorium. It addresses them point by point.
http://thebulletin.org/thorium-wonder
, May 19, 2014 10:25 PM
*To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: Thorium: the wonder fuel that wasn't
On 5/19/2014 9:30 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
At the risk of re-starting the Thorium wars grin this is a current
article on the why NOTS of Thorium
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Quentin Anciaux
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 11:49 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Thorium: the wonder fuel that wasn't
2014-05-20 8:28 GMT+02:00 'Chris de Morsella
@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: Thorium: the wonder fuel that wasn't
2014-05-20 8:28 GMT+02:00 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com:
What about the waste tails he alludes to. I had not known that they had
actually constructed and tested U233 bombs – had always
On 5/19/2014 11:48 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
These are valid criticisms that are very much not administrative nature but cut right to
the core [pun intended] of a world in which a multitude of thorium U233 breeder reactors
proliferate widely. There is a risk that this unintentionally leads to
2014-05-20 18:44 GMT+02:00 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 5/19/2014 11:48 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
These are valid criticisms that are very much not administrative nature
but cut right to the core [pun intended] of a world in which a multitude of
thorium U233 breeder reactors
Chris, Brent and other Th-savants: (I am not one)
Whatever radiates is suspect to me. Humans' world is vulnerable.
Bombs? We must WANT peace very much (si vis pacem, para bellum).
Suppose: someone discovers a 'good'way to make a Th-bomb (a different route
from the old one) - on historical examples
On 5/20/2014 11:45 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-05-20 18:44 GMT+02:00 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net:
On 5/19/2014 11:48 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
These are valid criticisms that are very much not administrative nature but
cut
right to the core
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
At the risk of re-starting the Thorium wars grin this is a current article on
the why NOTS of Thorium. It addresses them point by point.
http://thebulletin.org/thorium-wonder-fuel-wasnt7156
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
On 5/19/2014 9:30 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
At the risk of re-starting the Thorium wars grin this is a current article on the why
NOTS of Thorium. It addresses them point by point.
http://thebulletin.org/thorium-wonder-fuel-wasnt7156
A mishmash of criticism most
19 matches
Mail list logo
