On 08 Feb 2017, at 04:53, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 2/7/2017 9:12 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Which is exactly why I'm explicit in defining what the theism is
that I consider preposterous and what other god ideas I'm merely
agnostic about. Then Bruno criticizes me for "supporting" the
On 08 Feb 2017, at 04:02, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 2/7/2017 2:16 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Yes. The relation of mathematics to facts in the world is one of
description. That a dx/dt = -x has a decaying exponential as a
solution is
not a fact about the world. As any engineer will tell you,
On 07 Feb 2017, at 12:59, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Lol. There is no way to avoid the absolute since nothing can be
based on nothing,.
In this case you reify nothing, which is purely negative, as absence
of anything,, and convert it to "something". And this something that
you implicitly
On 2/8/2017 9:49 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 08 Feb 2017, at 04:53, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 2/7/2017 9:12 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Which is exactly why I'm explicit in defining what the theism is
that I consider preposterous and what other god ideas I'm merely
agnostic about. Then Bruno
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>
>>> from the third person points of view that he can have about himself, or
>>> better himselves.
>>
>>
> >>
>> No idea what that means, none whatsoever.
>
>
> >
> It means that the guy can say to his friend:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
> Lol. There is no way to avoid the absolute since nothing can be based on
> nothing,.
There is a difference between "the absolute" and "absolute belief". I
believe in an ultimate reality, but I am not sure we can see
On 08 Feb 2017, at 03:11, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
>> Abandon the assumption that "he" will have a unique
successor because it's just not true anymore.
> Right, from the third person points of view that he can have
7 matches
Mail list logo