On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 13:22 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > These are evil features, because:
> > * A high priority for you might be low priority or even spam for me
> > * Return receipts, as discussed many times before, are immoral
> Simply configure
> your edge mail server not to do deli
> If by return receipt you mean the Return-Receipt-To: header then this
> should not be implemented under any circumstances. Thankfully very few
> MTAs handle this now because it is a serious security problem - for
> example:-
> * Say I had put that header on this message. However the addre
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 13:31 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Return Receipt, Priority & Message Read Receipt are very useful
> when used judiciously, and I'm glad they are being implemented.
If by return receipt you mean the Return-Receipt-To: header then this
should not be implemented under any circum
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 16:25 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:13:41 +0200, Riccardo Escher wrote:
>
> > I was searching in evolution (2.2.1) for the possibility to set e-mail
> > options like return-receipt or priority, but I didn't find nothing.
> > Does somebody know how to se
> These are evil features, because:
> * A high priority for you might be low priority or even spam for me
> * Return receipts, as discussed many times before, are immoral
> Once upon a time the Evolution team was swearing that they will never
> include these features. Well, as Andre pointed out,
I think the biggest thing is that setting those flags means nothing.
I choose not to view the "flag" setting and I turn down return reciept on a
permanent basis. You might find it important to set the flags but there is no
mechanism whatsoever that guarantees that the user honors them. So in a wa
