Re: [Evolution] Maildir vs. POP functionality

2005-08-21 Thread Steve Listopad
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 10:51 +0800, Not Zed wrote: Umm, the whole point of maildir is that it doesn't move, it *should* stay where it is. I don't understand this comment, since I never suggested/recommended moving anything. Well, I did explain that I was using POP, and then switched to

Re: [Evolution] Maildir vs. POP functionality

2005-08-21 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 10:28 -0400, Steve Listopad wrote: On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 10:51 +0800, Not Zed wrote: Umm, the whole point of maildir is that it doesn't move, it *should* stay where it is. I don't understand this comment, since I never suggested/recommended moving anything.

Re: [Evolution] Maildir vs. POP functionality

2005-08-19 Thread Ron Johnson
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 10:51 +0800, Not Zed wrote: Umm, the whole point of maildir is that it doesn't move, it *should* stay where it is. I don't understand this comment, since I never suggested/recommended moving anything. If you want, you could configure evolution to copy the mail using a

Re: [Evolution] Maildir vs. POP functionality

2005-08-18 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 08:29 -0400, Steve Listopad wrote: All, Have qmail running on a linux box. Have Evolution running on same box, as my mail client. Previously, I used POP, with the behavior that I could remove the mail from the Maildir and store it in local (i.e. Evolution-style)

Re: [Evolution] Maildir vs. POP functionality

2005-08-18 Thread Not Zed
Umm, the whole point of maildir is that it doesn't move, it *should* stay where it is. If you want, you could configure evolution to copy the mail using a filter, like you might with imap. On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 14:54 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 08:29 -0400, Steve Listopad