I have the main Recipients container on Exchange 5.5 SP4 along with five
subcontainers. When we download/synchronize the offline address book for
the Outlook 2000 clients, it only lets me download the main recipients
container, not the subcontainers. I have a subcontainer for Contractors,
I break out lynx every once in a while. Mainly for upgrading stuff like
remote Apache web servers. Of course, that was just my home server and only
when they had the recent vulnerability, but still... :)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Title: RE: OWA Apology
Cool. The only thing Id change is replacing
the word insure with ensure in the third paragraph (counting your first
sentence about Kansas as the first paragraph). If I sound anal it is only because Ive seen that word
misused too many timesfour times in the last week
As I'm moving my company from PST files to server-based storage, two
questions have come across my mind.
1) Now that we can actually use cool features like folder-sharing, is
it possible to actually open another user's sub-Contacts folder (or any
subfolder for that matter)? It seems that
have
questions, let me know.)
Peter Dahl.
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 5:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: server-based storage/Outlook questions
As I'm moving my company from PST files to server-based storage
Exchange 5.5
1 server, 150 users
Dual PIII 850, 1GB RAM
3GB store, but we're in the process of moving from PST to server-based
(finally)
Our server is homebuilt by the way. Intel 440GX+ board, Adaptec 3200 RAID
card, or something like that.
2 18GB mirrored
3 73.4GB RAID 5
-Original
Did you verify it or something?
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail
That you even know that newsgroup exists worries me.
-Original
This is how we do it with our ISP. I'm not exactly sure what they do on
their end besides the second MX record (and actually they have a third as
well) for their server, but I know mail gets queued there and delivered when
ours is back online. It is free for us, but we're good customers for
Our previous server (less than a year ago) was Exchange 5.5, 4GB OS drive,
8GB Exchange drive. No RAID, everything on PST.
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE:
Restrict access to that distribution list so that only people that need to
use it can. Or just eliminate this guy from making future mistakes.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Title: Message
This is
just normal Don from what I can tell.
J
-Original Message-
From: Bunting, Jeff
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002
1:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller
someone leave their sense of humor at home
Title: Message
Yes, yes
it does.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002
3:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For Kevin Miller
Yeah, well, try being unemployed right now
without a cert. Regardless of the
I'm going to flaunt my ignorance of Exchange disaster recovery here. I've
read bits and pieces and understand things in theory, but haven't done any
tests yet (time, time, time). Anyway, here's a not-so-hypothetical example.
Say a user accidentally SHIFT+DELetes a lot of email in a folder.
:RE: replay logs
If you are using deleted item retention you should be able to enable the
dumpsteralwayson registry value and recover them without a restore of the
server.
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q178630
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford
OK, I can't seem to find my bookmark for the Swynk.com Exchange 5.5 FAQ. I
start out at http://www.swynk.com/exchange/ http://www.swynk.com/exchange/
and cannot find the FAQ for the life of me. Can someone provide me:
a) The clicks I need to perform to find this FAQ without searching
.
- Original Message -
From: Allen Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 3:17 PM
Subject: Swynk FAQ
OK, I can't seem to find my bookmark for the Swynk.com Exchange 5.5 FAQ.
I
start out at http://www.swynk.com/exchange/
http
Ok, I've been doing my homework on setting up a second Internet domain for
our Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. It didn't work exactly as I was expecting, but
I believe things are working correctly. All I did was add the second domain
to the routing tab in the IMC and routed it to our original domain.
Title: Message
You
wrongly assumed that people understood good grammar. J
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:07
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle this
Sheesh people.
I was simply making
dont kill me
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002
9:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle this
You wrongly assumed that people understood good
grammar. J
-Original
Message-
From: Matthew
I am planning on testing this soon, but since I'm anxious, does anyone know
if you are running an NT 4, Exchange 5.5 server, can you use a Windows 2000,
Exchange 5.5 server as a recovery server? In other words, if I have
Exchange 5.5 running the same service pack and patches and everything,
I'm not using Exchange 2000 here, but for some feedback...
1) I am moving people from PSTs to server-based storage and have yet to set
mailbox limits. However, I'm thinking 50-100MB for the average users,
250-500MB for Power Users. However, our company is small (about 150
mailboxes) and we
I would use the VPN access to the network with Outlook option. Not the
greatest with a dial-up, but assuming he has two lines it should be
manageable for 3-6 months...
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:50 PM
To:
Ha, I made the same assumption...normally I do the he/she thing too...
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Creative Solutions
Wow, what an assumption - it's a
I would have AV on the Exchange server before any other server considering
that 99%* of all viruses are spread via email.
* Fact that I made up, but I bet is pretty close to being accurate.
-Original Message-
From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
necessary?
Well, 99% of computer viruses, maybe.
And as I said to Matt offline, with a 60GB Store (and I think Matt's will be
larger), there is no such thing as a 'quick Exmerge'.
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:05 PM
It still depends on the situation. Our best programmer was a college
drop-out. I'm sure he makes the most money out of all the programmers too.
Very, very intelligent man...and good programmer obviously.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
Why is that bad? We have plenty of employees at other offices and other
companies (and the parent company) that send us email from outside of our
Exchange server. Why shouldn't I let them know that I'm on vacation for two
weeks instead of them waiting on a response for two weeks and thinking I
Title: Message
Are there
two Kevin Millers on this list?
Do any of you (Kevin Millers) live/work in Florida? I have an off-topic question if
so. This may sound weird, but a
long time ago someone named Kevin Miller helped me with an Exchange issue and I
believe he said he was in the
Title: Message
And is
very expensive I believe. But at
least Goldmine finally added the ability to authenticate the user on outgoing
email like all the other real email clients. Of course, it wasnt designed to be an email client
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
]
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: cleaning calendar items
I just used the Clean Mailbox tool to clean up some old conference room
calendars. It worked great except
I just used the Clean Mailbox tool to clean up some old conference room
calendars. It worked great except that the days still show up with the bold
font where appointments used to exist. The appointments are no longer
there, but the dates are still bold. Is there a way to fix this?
List
Ok, has anyone that uses BENT 8.6 with the Exchange Server agent received
the following error?
Unable to attach to \\NOELANI\Microsoft Exchange Directory.
The device cannot be found.
^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Unable to attach to \\NOELANI\Microsoft Exchange Directory.
^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Unable to attach to
I wouldn't think so, unless the spammers are coming from your own Exchange
Server. All I know is that whenever someone from the outside world requests
a read receipt, I'm usually asked if I want to send it or not. Of course,
that is with Outlook (Internet Mail Only) and Outlook Express at home.
Speaking of licensing. I know this has been in here before, so I plan on
searching the archives, but if anyone who hasn't talked about this recently
feels like explaining to me how they've handled the threat letter from
Microsoft regarding licensing, I'd appreciate it. Our 30 days are counting
Title: Message
Or hire
better managers. Thats their
job. Employees goof off, whether
it is on the phone, too many breaks, etc.
Does he monitor phone calls too?
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002
9:39 AM
To:
...
-
Original Message -
From: Allen Crawford
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Monday, February 25,
2002 11:14 AM
Subject: RE:
Exchange 5.5 Question
Or hire better
managers. That's their job. Employees goof off, whether it is on
the phone, too many breaks, etc.
Does he monitor
But if you hold down SHIFT while deleting, it is completely gone. I think
that is what he meant by a hard delete.
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 8:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Brick
, February 23, 2002
4:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE : Why would anyone
install Exchange on a PDC?
With
which adaptec card for scsi?
Is
there any way to do it with ide drives and adaptec 1200 for exemple ?
-Message d'origine-
De: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Wow, I thought my PDC (P133 with 128MB of RAM) was bad...
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 6:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Why would anyone install Exchange on a PDC?
Dude... I
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 9:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Why would anyone install Exchange on a PDC?
Wow, I thought my PDC (P133 with 128MB of RAM) was bad...
-Original Message-
From
Title: Message
Ben is
right. You can do the same thing
with a hot-swappable RAID1 array.
Just unplug the bad one and plug in the new one (the way I understand it
anyway, havent had a failure on one yet) and it rebuilds, all online.
-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: RE: Why would anyone install Exchange on a PDC?
That is an
incorrect point though. If you
have any decent, hot-swappable RAID controller/drives, it works exactly the
same for RAID1 as it does for RAID5.
The comment you quoted was if you DIDNT have hot-swappable drives.
this cool elf bowling game! What? You
can't get .exe files? Wait... I'll zip it for you
Evan
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: ScanMail 3.8
Title: Message
Or to make
things easy, you might want to buy a Linksys Cable/DSL router (or similar
device). That would be much better
than nothing.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002
3:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Securing Exchange
Server
Wouldn't that block out FTP
ports? I assumed those only allowed the HTTP ports through..
Chris
Simmons
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21
Title: Message
This may
sound ignorant, and if it does, then I guess it really is ignorant, but here
goes anyway.
Why is
placing an Exchange server on the DMZ bad? We are getting a PIX soon and are going to be changing a lot
of things here. Our reseller just
informed me the price of
Exchange inside
the firewall, more secure and less prone to hacker attacks.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002
3:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject
Yesterday, probably around noon, some users have started to experience some
Exchange slowness. These users are still using PST files while a few
people are starting to move to server-based storage (i.e. me and two other
people are testing it right now). Anyway, we've been on this configuration
More than likely Groupshield. Exchange can't do it on its own as far as I
know, but I've never used Groupshield either...
-Original Message-
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 1:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
I just noticed that about 3.8 myself.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 1:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: OK I need to block attachments
It depends. I dotn use Groupshield, and the
Ok, I posted earlier regarding this, but my message might have been too long
for you guys. It was also in regards to ScanMail, but now that I've killed
ScanMail and the problem still exists, I'm assuming it isn't related. So
here's the problem.
As of yesterday afternoon, many people (if not
/Exchange
Check out my 'e-mail arriving in batches thread'...
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 12:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: maybe OT: ScanMail/Exchange
Yesterday, probably around noon, some users have
OK, since everyone has been talking about this and Antigen lately, I'll add
this.
I just got off the phone with Trend's tech support and apparently there is
an issue with blocking file extensions. I noticed that SYS and VBS files
were not being blocked, even though they were on my list (or
;*.ovl;*.pcd;*.pif;*.pl;*.plx;*.scr;*.sct;*.sh;*.sh
b;*.shs;*.sys;*.vbe;*.vbs;*.vss;*.vst;*.vxd;*.wsc;*.wsf;*.wsh;*.lnk;*.reg;
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 5:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:ScanMail 3.8 for Exchange
Title: e-mail arriving in batches
Outlook 97
works fine with Exchange 5.5. I
have no idea about Exchange 2000 though.
And unfortunately I have no idea how to help Angie out.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002
I'm not sure how the rest of the cable modems work, but with @home
(obviously this doesn't matter much now) you basically get a static IP
anyway. Sure it uses DHCP, but does that matter when it never expires?
With our new cable company's service (just got switched to Insight
yesterday) it
.
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Server in a Cable Environment
I'm not sure how the rest of the cable modems work, but with @home
(obviously this doesn't matter much now) you
not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Server
years has changed :
1) they upgraded my modem to a new one
2) when I swapped the NIC
No other times...
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 08:59
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Server in a Cable Environment
Just click Start--Run, then type in outlook /cleanfreebusy and click OK.
That is what Peter is suggesting. Whether it works or not will be
determined by you.
-Original Message-
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:08 AM
To:
I sort of agree, but I have (had) an @home.com email address and only had it
because I was a cable modem subscriber. I never used this address for
anything other than checking it once a month for my billing information.
Guess what? I get about 8 junk emails each day on that account now. I know
I don't know for sure, but I do know that MyParty got blocked on our
ScanMail just fine with *.COM being blocked.
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 1:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Antigen
We make them ZIP them up...or just rename it I guess since Trend ScanMail
doesn't actually check the format, at least not version 3.61. I'm planning
to upgrade to 3.8 to see if it makes a difference though. The other
alternative for large files (we have a 15MB limit on our message size) is to
Good.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Attachment blocking Now what!
I think many of you are going to find that these old backdoor methods are on
their
This may sound dumb, but what do you mean by cut and paste filtering
options? Just being able to cut/paste the file extensions you want to block
from another program like ScanMail or what?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February
I'm no expert, but I believe that each radio button in the same category
should have the same name field, but each category should have a different
name. Then you should only be able to select one radio button per category,
but one in each category. The way I understand your problem is that you
Title: Message
I just ran
into the same exact problem. I can
forward you what Microsoft gave me (they ended up refunding my $245) if youd
like. It is just one article about
the 1018 errors and a few other basics that you can find online anyway. I wasnt aware that they signified
hardware
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002
5:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: wow
You can adjust what
attachments are shown through Exchange. But you can't block them or
anything. It just hides
Title: Message
I read how, but it sounded like a big pain in the neck to me. That and we arent using server-based
storage yet. Stupid PSTs
-Original Message-
From: Eugene Pesochin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002
12:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Title: Message
You can adjust what attachments are shown through Exchange. But you cant block them or
anything. It just hides them from
Outlook as far as I can tell.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002
12:58 PM
You could use a VPN and do it. That's what we are forced to do for our
Goldmine users since its mail client is pathetic. But in Outlook/Outlook
Express we just have them check the box that says My server requires
authentication under the Outgoing Mail Server for POP3/IMAP email.
-Original
I was wondering how I could reinitialize the information store on a test
Exchange Server. Is it possible to just wipe it out and start over without
reinstalling Exchange or losing any other settings like the directory store?
Basically I want to start with a clean PRIV.EDB.
Thanks,
Allen
List
: reinitialize IS
Well, if its exchange 2000, you can just delete the file, and it
will create a new one.
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: reinitialize IS
I was wondering how I
Looks good to me too. I never touched URLScan before though. How do you
modify its settings? Or do you just leave it alone? I checked the log file
and it shows that it blocks requests for certain file types, but I was
wondering how you change those types, or if I should just rerun IIS
Title: Message
Thats the
case for me. I used to look at
those but too many people sign up for too many mailing lists and it got too
annoying.
Just
curious, earlier you said you have an ex-employee list of aliases. Can you elaborate on that? Also, whats the DL blackhole? Do you mean
So what's the point of black holes anyway? Just to reduce the NDRs?
-Original Message-
The blackhole is to create a DL that has multiple SMTP addresses of
ex-employees, but make sure there's no members in the DL. Messages sent
to the relevant SMTP addresses simply vanish. Shame you
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Employee Departures
I just prefer to remove any subscriptions to any high-volume mailing
lists if I can.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 20
It is in our policy as well. I guess we could sue them later like they are
doing to the guy in this article.
(if you are reading the NT list you've probably seen this already)
http://www.securityfocus.com/news/300
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
are lazy admins.
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 8:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Employee Departures - Blackholes
So what's the point of black holes anyway? Just to reduce the NDRs?
-Original
with it the
contact/contract/confirmation etc may never occur.
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 21 December 2001 6:57 a.m.
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Employee Departures - Blackholes
Well, what does that make me considering I don't even
Title: internet email header question
I often get confused when looking at these headers and I was wondering if anyone could help describe exactly what this means to me. I'm trying to determine where the source of the spam is coming from on this particular email. The part that is confusing me
Title: plain text/HTML
OK, my last post was sent in plain text format with Outlook 2000 and using Word as my email editor. How come every time I post that way (or with Rich Text Format, which is usually what I use) it always shows up as an HTML message? Is it Word causing the problem? I'm
Test 3 (Word, plain text)
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Test 1 (Word editor/Outlook Rich Text)
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
IDEA Industry Manager
A+ Certified Service Technician
Profile Systems, Inc.
413-737-2000 x135
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 8:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: plain text/HTML
OK, my last post was sent
Test 5 (Word/HTML, not that I ever want to do this, but making sure it
works anyway)
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Test 4 (no Word, plain text)
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
--ignore
Alt.test
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: plain text/HTML testing--ignore
Test 1 (Word editor/Outlook Rich Text)
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt
Looks like Michèle was correct. Uncheck HTML under the MIME attachments
section in the Internet Mail Service properties. You'll need to restart the
IMS of course.
Sorry to all who were annoyed by the test posts.
-Original Message-
From: Siatkowski, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Title: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)
I think we all just love to hear you rant about CA. :)
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)
Is this a
2000 Server
List
He wanted to know of a good
one... :P
D
Get all over this like a donkey on a
waffle.
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001
9:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Windows 2000 Server
List
Title: RE: NoHTML
Haven't seen this, but I might check it out. I do have a related question though. Many times (maybe every time, I'm not sure) on this list, I'll send a message and it will show up as an HTML message. I'm going to use this message as a test. Currently it says Plain Text at
Title: RE: referencing outside email addresses
I made a new recipients container under the main one and stuck all my custom recipients in there for that exact case. All of our tech support guys/gals have cell phones with email addresses, so we give them a Custom Recipient called First
Title: RE: Wondering
Well, I can't recall your questions, but I don't answer too many because I'm not that good with Exchange yet.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Mailloux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Title: RE: Wondering
Speaking of not reading messages, did you happen to read mine with the subject of Event ID 13004? You were the guy I was hoping would reply and help me out, in a very sarcastic way of course. You Kevin or William anyway...
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely
Have you checked this article out?
http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q220905
So you know where that IP is coming from? Remote
user?
There is nothing to fear but fear
itself. -Franklin D. Roosevelt
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL
. I would think you
would see what account was failing its credentials. I've never seen that
specific error on any of my servers.
D
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001
11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
?
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001
11:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: event id 13004
We tracerouted it to some place in Cali by Orange and
Santa Ana. It just times out when
it gets there. I had my friend log
into his
Title: event id 13004
A friend of mine has the following error on his Exchange 5.5 Server. Is this the work of one of the worms out there or a hacker or neither? Also, is there an easy way to block this IP on the Exchange Server?
Event ID: 13004
Source: MSExchange POP3
Logon attempt
disable send
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001
11:29
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: compacting IS (was
Large Exchange Store)
Thanks.
I figured as much and planned on only using half of my array
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
