Went to create a new imap account in mail.app in Mac OS 10.5.2 and got an
error stating that my password couldn't be confirmed, check my password,
yadda yadda. Completed the profile and changed the auth to 'password' and
all was good. Deleted that profile, went back through the wizard and
Make sure that you have all the appropriate DNS entries on the external
DNS server. Comcast is getting twitchy about accepting mail form certain
netblocks and domains. My home is wired to Comcast and they sometimes
reject mail from my domain here.
If you need to, contact Comcast's corporate
Then obviously your experiences have been different from mine. Once I
did a physical defrag of the hard disk, I chopped a half hour off the
backup time to tape, on line database maintenance completed more quickly
and my users perceived faster response times from the server.
By the laws of
Despite what other people say , I agree totally with you
GuidoElia
HELPPC
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: venerdì 28 marzo 2008 8.05
A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: reclaiming space
Then obviously
I know this has been discussed at least a little bit, but I'm way too much
of a neat freak to keep any mail around for long...
The issue was blackberry users on Exchange 2007 SP1 create an OOF, it works
for a bit then stops working. Reading the release notes of 4.1.5 which is
supposed to support
Whoa! Was that uncalled for or did I miss something?
From: Durf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 5:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: Thursday Funny: Computer gender
You know, a little while in Walter Reed might
I am seeing the same thing in Outlook 2007. I have not found a fix for
it but would love to hear from someone who did.
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 10:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook
So, do mean like having your PTR and reverse DNS setup correctly, or
something related to the nameservers?
I will relay that info back to my provider. It seems another one of our
ISP's customer has also reported the same issue.
Good to know John, thanks.
-Sam
-Original Message-
From:
This has been tested pretty intensively recently and found to behave as
expected.
The only times I have seen ANY difference at all was on tiny workgroup servers
with a couple of disk spindles, and quite large databases.
Essentially we only get about 25MB/sec per stream from the backup API (per
The Conjugal Rights Guide.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ivsb79-h90NR=1
-Original Message-
From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 10:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Thursday Funny: Computer gender
A Spanish teacher was explaining
Oh how I wish I had the time to be a blogger, but I did make time to
comment on DNS issues with anti-spam products:
http://www.espinola.net/blog/archives/5
Summary: Make sure you have accurate A, MX, and PTR records for your
outbound server.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Sam Cayze [EMAIL
Perhaps I misunderstood, but I thought a file level defrag on an Exchange DB
was a big NO NO and that it would/could corrupt the DB?
--Rob
snip
Oh, BTW, make sure you run a decent physical file defragmentation tool
once you've completed the ESEUTIL defrag, like Perfect Disk 2008. That
will
Hi,
Two Exchange 2003 servers display this when I telnet to each of them:
Version: 6.0.3790.3959
Version: 6.0.3790.1830
Does the difference in version # tell me anything? Is one of them
missing a particular patch(es)?
Thx
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~
For those who enjoy British humor, this site is by a talented writer and
for some reason he keeps me in stitchesthought I'd share:
http://www.mil-millington.com/
NOTE: Posted to both Exchange and NT lists.
Bill Lambert
Windows System Administrator
Concuity
A healthcare division
For those who enjoy British humor, this site is by a talented writer and
for some reason he keeps me in stitchesthought I'd share:
http://www.mil-millington.com/
NOTE: Posted to both Exchange and NT lists.
Bill Lambert
Windows System Administrator
Concuity
A healthcare division
And, of course (smacking myself upside the head), from the Exchange
Management Shell, you can get-mailboxstatistics | ft displayname,
lastlogontime, lastlogofftime.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Angie Urtel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Two Exchange 2003 servers display this when I telnet to each of them:
Version: 6.0.3790.3959
Version: 6.0.3790.1830
Does the difference in version # tell me anything? Is one of them missing a
particular patch(es)?
Thx
You most likely are missing patches/service pack. Go to ESM and
Have you restarted IIS?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Iain Rhodes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 6:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Organisational Forms Library
Running
I thought 2003 versions were 6.5.x.x. KB158530. I guess there's more than one
set of version numbers.
From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 9:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 versions?
Hi,
Two Exchange 2003 servers display this
That's what I figured... but is there a listing somewhere that will tell
me what patches bring it to: 6.0.3790.3959?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Abel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 1:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: re: Exchange 2003 versions?
Hi,
Just a personal pickeyness maybe, but any mail system that does ANYTHING
with MX records of a sending domain is just wrong - MX is about inbound,
not outbound mail.
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 10:38 AM
To:
Ok, that's funny stuff :)
See if you can spot the difference between these two statements:
(a) Those trousers make your backside look fat.
(b) You're a repellently obese old hag upon whom I am compelled to heap
insults and derision - depressingly far removed from the, 'stupid,
squeaky,
6.0.3790.3959 is what my fully patches Exchange 2003 servers show.
I only patch from Microsoft Update and/or WSUS, therefore if you run either of
those then you should be able to get them up to the same versions. There is no
list that I am aware of.
Simon.
--
Simon Butler
MVP: Exchange, MCSE
It's not something you would do while Exchange was online. It's another
offline process and most likely unnecessary, except in extreme
circumstances.
From: Rob Bonfiglio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 10:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: reclaiming
Someone posted a very good question to that 'A, MX, PTR' blog article
since I posted the link. For those that are unfamiliar with PTR and
HELO filtering by anti-spam filters, you might want to check out the
question and my response(s).
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
[EMAIL
It should exist as a way of replying to the sender's domain. Replying
to the server or envelop-sender is rarely an option.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a personal pickeyness maybe, but any mail system that does ANYTHING
with MX records of a sending
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 2:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 versions?
6.0.3790.3959 is what my fully patches Exchange 2003 servers show.
I only patch from Microsoft Update and/or
I'm posting this as an informative post only as the issue was resolved.
Might help someone else in the future because I know I'm not the only one
that has done this or will do this.
About 9 months ago, we started a process to replace our domain controllers
with new, under warranty, better etc etc
Thank you. I'll be walking through that process in the next couple of
months.
Mark
-
Two rules to success in life:
1. Never tell people everything you know.
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Tom Strader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Executive secretary needs to create Distribution Lists for the President
within HIS contacts folder. This person has access to view and create
contacts for him and she can crate a DL folder, but cannot pull from
the
Same here. Timely information that I'm putting right in my upgrade
folder. Thanks Sherry!
From: Mark Boersma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 2:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Interesting Exchange Event I Had This Week
Very nice work and thanks for sharing.
Cheers.
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 2:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Interesting Exchange Event I Had This Week
~ Ninja Email Security with
Check this KB and you'll know everything about Exchange versions ;)
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=158530
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Is it possible to create a mail contact in Exch2k7 and forward it to an
external email address? Under mailflow settings, there are no delivery
options, only under mailflow for actual mailboxes.
Thanks,
Bob
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~
Oh no's!
If this is accurate, Comcast's anti-spam is done by Symantec!
http://www.comcastblacklist.com/?page_id=6
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone posted a very good question to that 'A, MX, PTR' blog article
since I posted the link.
Yes, you can. Where are you creating the contact?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Robert Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 5:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail Forwarding in Exch2k7
Is it
Under ECM Recipient Configuration Mail Contact
Regular mailboxes have the delivery options, but for mail contacts, I only
have only message size restriction and delivery restrictions.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Michael B. Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, you can. Where are you
Definitely going to keep this one in mind for future scenarios.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Sherry Abercrombie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm posting this as an informative post only as the issue was resolved.
Might help someone else in the future because I know I'm not the only one
that
This information is good to know Sherry. I'm about to do a swing migration
of Exchange 2003 this weekend right after I install a couple 2003 Domain
Controllers tonight (and soon thereafter demote our 2000 domain controllers
so they can be decommissioned). I'll pay close attention while I go
Kevin:
Does the saying There are seldom technological solutions to
behavioral problems fit this situation? Sorry but I don't recall the
person who said this first.
John H. Matteson, Jr.
Systems Administrator/ITT Systems
FOB Orgun-E
Afghanistan
DSN - 318 431 8001
VoSIP - (308) 431 -
BES 4.1 SP5 MR1 and a post MR1 hotfix (Maintenance Release 1) which is due
sometime next month or later supposedly resolve this issue.
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:15:56 -0700From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]: BES 4.1.x, Exchange 2007 SP1 and OOFI know this has been discussed
at
http://www.espinola.net/wiki/Crowley's_law
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Michael B. Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We give credit to Ed Crowley, our favorite curmudgeon, for that saying.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original
I was called in by another tech who had some problems with a new network
that had just been installed. The server is SBS 2003 R2 with the included
Exchange 2003, patched. The Outlook client is the one included with Office
2007 on XP Pro. All patches are reported to have been installed. About half
Is this a Dell server with a Broadcom NIC?
If so... and even if not... Make sure disable Receive Side Scaling in
the NIC Config properties.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/936594
Also, there is a recent Windows Update that does this as well, but I do
not have the KB handy.
Check the archives
Couple of question:
1. You didn't mention it, but did you try removing one of the stations from
the domain, then rejoining it with a different name - you state that you're
not sure if the stations had been removed from the original domain.
2. If the above was tried and didn't work, then doing a
45 matches
Mail list logo
