[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:51
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
[Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha
nge
You are, of course, correct.
Are you moving from 5.5 to 2K?
J (CB)
-Original Message
Title: Message
You are, of course, correct.
Are you moving from 5.5 to 2K?
J (CB)
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11,
2002 11:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
[Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster
-Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:51
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
[Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha
nge
You are, of course, correct.
Are you moving from 5.5 to 2K?
J
-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster
installation of excha nge
Yes.
It's
been an adventure since my arrival here.
But
yes. Dallas has 12 people migrated with 100 more this week to my first
ever Exchange2000 cluster install.
Oh,
and we
:
Tuesday, March 12, 2002 4:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster
installation of excha nge
Yes.
It's been an adventure since my arrival
here.
But yes. Dallas has 12 people migrated with
100 more this week
-Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:51
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
[Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha
nge
You are, of course, correct.
Are you moving
Is there anything that they forget to tell you
in these papers.
Only
that the return seems to exceed the effort.
Active/Passive is best for now.
William
-Original Message-From: Sabo, Eric
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:12
AMTo: MS-Exchange
