David Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] (So 08 Jan 2006 23:25:43 CET):
I have configured SMTP auth and TLS on my server (as per some articles I
found somewhere) so I can now tell Thunderbird to use my Exim4 server as
the sending SMTP server with a username/password. It did work initially,
but for
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, Dean Brooks wrote:
From this you could extract the domain or the local part as:
${domain:${address:$h_from:}}
${local_part:${address:$h_from:}}
Except in the case of the From: header line containing more than one
address. This is permitted by RFC 2822, though I
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, Marc Perkel wrote:
I don't know if the ACLs have this but here's what I want to do. I want to
test to see if a directory exists and if it doesn't I want to jump past a
dozen other tests to some label. Is there any kind of goto label in ACLs?
One ACL can call another:
#
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Darryl Hamilton wrote:
The problem appears to be that bounce mail, or mail that looks like bounce
mail, bypasses any Exim user filters in place, after going through
SpamAssassin.
if error_message then finish endif
^
Tony.
--
[EMAIL
--On 6 January 2006 11:06:25 -0800 Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So where should I check it? Thanks for your help.
In the DATA ACL.
Tony Finch wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Marc Perkel wrote:
Trying to reject based on subject. This is in the predata acl
The message header
Hi Marc,
I've planed a similar developpement named phpeximadmin http://
www.phpeximadmin.net (nothing to see for the moment)
with at least three parts :
- mailq administration
- configuration settind based on
- an existing conf file parsed
- templates with some kind of
I could use some help with the proper ACLs for the above itemsI
have some given to me but I'm not sure they are correct or functioning
at all in terms of Virus checking. Here is my setup
Exim 4.60
Spamassassin 3.1
Sophie 3.05
Sophos (Latest rev - yes, licensed and running fine with Exim 3.36)
Hi,
See the error message below whilst testing what happens when trying to
deliver mail to a non-existent user on an exim setup using virtual
domains in an UW-vIMAP style. When sending to a user that does exist it
all works fine, and when sending to a false one it fails as it should.
I'm
Chris Corbyn wrote:
See the error message below whilst testing what happens when trying to
deliver mail to a non-existent user on an exim setup using virtual
domains in an UW-vIMAP style. When sending to a user that does exist it
My crystal ball is broken, so you should probably write a
Chris Corbyn wrote:
And you should really use a valid return address...
--- snip ---
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
On 9 Jan 2006, at 14:53, Jakob Hirsch wrote:
Chris Corbyn wrote:
And you should really use a valid return address...
--- snip ---
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a
Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unrouteable address
a temporary DNS problem perhaps? It worked fine here (manually tested
on the primary using an empty envelope).
I don't know, the message came from wumpus.mythic-beasts.com (sorry for
stripping the headers):
Subject:
We're seeing a fair number of blank messages, probably caused by buggy
viruses or probes from infected machines. I've been having a look at this
in a bit more detail (from the point of view of rejecting these messages)
and it showed up some anomalies in the way Exim handles the message size.
(1)
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Tony Finch wrote:
We're seeing a fair number of blank messages, probably caused by buggy
viruses or probes from infected machines. I've been having a look at
this in a bit more detail (from the point of view of rejecting these
messages) and it showed up some anomalies
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Tony Finch wrote:
(1) Exim should log the message size as received, in addition to or
instead of its size after alterations by Exim. I don't mind whether
this replaces or augments the existing S= field. Any opinions?
I think given that people are used to the S= field being
Tony Finch wrote:
(1) The S= field in the logs indicates the message size after Exim has
altered the headers, in particular the addition of a Received: line but
also submission mode changes, addition from ACL warn verbs, and other
rewrites. This can be a little confusing.
Yeah, the S= value
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Marc Sherman wrote:
I'd recommend that S= on = lines be the size actually received on the
wire (ie: $message_size at DATA ACL time), and possibly add S= on = for
the size of the message delivered (including any modifications made by
the router and transport, ie: the value
Dear all,
I've had a request to set up an alias for a user whose name includes an
acute accented e. I'm trying to find out how Exim handles such
characters and how to store such an address in our MySQL database of
external email addresses. Any pointers folks?
--
Paul Walsh
Systems Manager
Anyone have an ACL to detect all caps subject lines?
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Paul Walsh wrote:
I've had a request to set up an alias for a user whose name includes an acute
accented e. I'm trying to find out how Exim handles such characters and how to
store such an address in our MySQL database of external email addresses. Any
pointers folks?
Tony Finch wrote:
Email addresses are ascii-only at the moment, though you can have
internationalized friendly names. The IETF is just starting to argue
about how to extend the email address format beyond ascii, so expect to
wait some years before applications support it.
Tony.
Thanks. I
On the off chance that some folks may find this useful...
The site here is making a move to have MUA clients use the MSA
port, rather than using the regular SMTP port. To get a handle on
laggards, we wanted to get some kind of ACL to detect a MUA when
it connected. The way we've been deciding if
Tony Finch wrote:
There's already a delivery_size log selector, which does exactly what you
want :-)
Heh. That'll learn me not to RTFM before I post.
- Marc
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the
On 9 Jan 2006, at 15:33, Jakob Hirsch wrote:
Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unrouteable address
a temporary DNS problem perhaps? It worked fine here (manually tested
on the primary using an empty envelope).
I don't know, the message came from wumpus.mythic-beasts.com
exim list subscriber wrote:
On the off chance that some folks may find this useful...
The site here is making a move to have MUA clients use the MSA port,
rather than using the regular SMTP port. To get a handle on laggards, we
wanted to get some kind of ACL to detect a MUA when it
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Edgar Lovecraft wrote:
Jethro R Binks wrote:
I was contemplating the wisdom of
refusing a message that contains none of To:, Cc:, Subject:, Date:,
From: headers.
Recognising that Date: and From: are required by RFC2822, I can't see
that the above would be an
Hi,
I'm using Exim 4.50 with Courier IMAP.
Is it possible to save mails which were sent via SMTP in user's sent-mail
directory?
Regards,
Michael
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list
On 9 Jan 2006, at 21:56, Michael Neurohr wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Exim 4.50 with Courier IMAP.
Is it possible to save mails which were sent via SMTP in user's
sent-mail
directory?
certainly it is. It should be the client application making the copy
though, since you use IMAP.
If you want to
28 matches
Mail list logo
