I am wondering if replacing (simplified, left out my -d ip,ip and more
complex -u for spamc):
command = /usr/local/sbin/exim -oMr spam-scanned -bS
transport_filter = /usr/local/bin/spamc -f -s 50 -u nobody
with for instance:
command = /usr/local/bin/spamc -B -f -t 30 -s 50
Marco Herrn wrote:
2006-02-09 13:19:49 1F7Am3-0008Uf-W1 = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
H=fmmailgate01.web.de [217.72.192.221] P=esmtp S=30388 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2006-02-09 13:24:49 1F7Am3-0008Uf-W1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: spamcheck transport
output: An error was detected while processing a file of BSMTP
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 08:15:09PM +0100, Jakob Hirsch wrote:
Marco Herrn wrote:
2006-02-09 13:19:49 1F7Am3-0008Uf-W1 = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
H=fmmailgate01.web.de [217.72.192.221] P=esmtp S=30388 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2006-02-09 13:24:49 1F7Am3-0008Uf-W1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: spamcheck
I am wondering if replacing (simplified, left out my -d ip,ip and more
complex -u for spamc):
command = /usr/local/sbin/exim -oMr spam-scanned -bS
transport_filter = /usr/local/bin/spamc -f -s 50 -u nobody
with for instance:
command = /usr/local/bin/spamc -B -f -t 30 -s
Renaud Allard wrote:
Hello,
I am now using exim 4.60, and I noticed something quite strange to me in
the logs when doing sender verification. Here is the relevant log line:
2006-02-09 11:38:28 H=c-24-63-184-85.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.63.184.85]
sender verify fail for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I would like to make a spamtrap account on exim using SpamAssassin.
Here is what I wan to do
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] receive a spam that has not been tagged as spam by
SpamAssassin
= the [EMAIL PROTECTED] forward this mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
= the .forward stored in the account [EMAIL
Hi all,
a strange thing is happening currently using some mailing list on my site:
We are running Exim 4.42 with Berkeley DB 4.0.14 enaled hosted on a
Debian 3.1 linux system, we are using DBM aliases files for our users.
We are using some distribution lists (alias expansions mechanism) with
Hi all,
I would like to make a spamtrap account on exim using SpamAssassin.
Here is what I wan to do
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] receive a spam that has not been tagged as spam by
SpamAssassin
= the [EMAIL PROTECTED] forward this mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
= the .forward stored in the account [EMAIL
Hi,
Marco Herrn wrote:
2006-02-09 13:19:49 1F7Am3-0008Uf-W1 = [EMAIL PROTECTED] H=fmmailgate01.web.de
[217.72.192.221] P=esmtp S=30388 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2006-02-09 13:24:49 1F7Am3-0008Uf-W1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: spamcheck transport
output: An error was detected while processing a file of BSMTP
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Renaud Allard wrote:
If I do it by hand, I just get:
telnet calligate2.cali.co.uk 25
Trying 62.172.47.141...
Connected to calligate2.cali.co.uk.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 digest2.cali.co.uk ESMTP server ready (Alligate v1.5.11.16-267.1-1.23)
helo mail.llorien.org
Well, in fact, my concern is that exim logged response to MAIL
FROM: when it should have logged reponse to RCPT TO:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. By no means the server could have answered
before I gave the RCPT TO command. Furthermore, as the RCPT seems a
correct address exim uses, I see no reason the
Xiaoyu Huang wrote:
Hello,
I write a php script to connect to exim smtp server and send mails. it does
work for exim 4.52. but after exim's upgraded to 4.53, a strange 500 error
happened.
Connecting to host address ...
Connected to SMTP server .
Well, quite surprising is this:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
exim-users@exim.org
SMTP error from remote mail
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Renaud Allard wrote:
Well, quite surprising is this:
2006-02-10 12:53:37 1F7XmJ-000564-TM H=(mail.llorien.org)
[2001:4830:1700:8::2]:41886 I=[2001:630:200:8080:20e:cff:fe09:a58a]:25
F=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rejected after DATA:
'' missing at end of address:
failing address in To
Hi, I checked the log and find the following lines: 2006-02-10 13:41:54 no
IP address found for host (HIDE) (during SMTP connection from (
yourpptsys.biz) [(HIDE)]) 2006-02-10 13:41:54 SMTP connection from (
yourpptsys.biz) [(HIDE)] lost while reading message data (header) yours,
Xiaoyu
--
## List
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Renaud Allard wrote:
After doing what you suggest, I get a mail delivery failure notification,
which logs well, the RCPT TO: failed.
Here is the relevant part of the/tmp/xxx
Not quite... :-)
SMTP RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
waiting for data on socket
read response
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Tony Finch wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Renaud Allard wrote:
Well, quite surprising is this:
2006-02-10 12:53:37 1F7XmJ-000564-TM H=(mail.llorien.org)
[2001:4830:1700:8::2]:41886 I=[2001:630:200:8080:20e:cff:fe09:a58a]:25
F=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rejected after DATA:
''
Hello Jakob,
Jakob Hirsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brent Clark wrote:
I was wondering if I shouldnt add something like
require_files = $local_part:$home/.forward
I don't think this helps. The fault is the user uucp is created by the
default installation, but not his home.
Bye, Jörg.
--
Joerg Sommer wrote:
require_files = $local_part:$home/.forward
I don't think this helps.
Why not? It's a precondition, so the router will not run (and therefore
not defer) if ~/.forward is not accessible.
The fault is the user uucp is created by the
default installation, but not his home.
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
exim 4.60:
# rm /var/mail/arekm/maildirsize; echo test | mail arekm
# cat /var/mail/arekm/maildirsize | head
-2147483648S,0C
3716 6
472 1
#
Looks like overflow. Another thing is that it seems that quota is limited to
2GB
I am trying to either remove a particular email from several pop accounts or
separate the file into individual messages. Does anyone have a clue as to
how to do this?
Tony Heal
Pace Systems Group, Inc.
800-624-5999
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
## List details at
Hello Jakob,
Jakob Hirsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Sommer wrote:
require_files = $local_part:$home/.forward
I don't think this helps.
Why not? It's a precondition, so the router will not run (and therefore
not defer) if ~/.forward is not accessible.
As I understand the spec the
On 2/9/06, Jakob Hirsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. Write my own recipient verification program and call it from an ACL
using run or readsocket. I think I'm going to do this anyway as
Which will not work if their server is down, and that's just the time a
backup mx is needed. Except for
Joerg Sommer wrote:
require_files = $local_part:$home/.forward
I don't think this helps.
Why not? It's a precondition, so the router will not run (and therefore
not defer) if ~/.forward is not accessible.
As I understand the spec the check is only if the user exists (in
/etc/passwd). This
Tony Heal wrote:
I am trying to either remove a particular email from several pop accounts or
separate the file into individual messages. Does anyone have a clue as to
how to do this?
mb2md ( http://batleth.sapienti-sat.org/projects/mb2md/ ) will split a
file up. It's intended for converting
I've been having this problem for the longest time, where some connecting
hosts take a minute before my mail server responds, and is suspected as
the cause of some recent incoming Gmail mail being delayed for days
(because Gmail would timeout before my mail server would respond).
That command
Well, the thing is, when doing it in debug mode, I receive this mail
back (normal, the address doesn't exists):
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Renaud Allard wrote:
Which is the output I expected in the logs, namely failed after RCPT
TO: not after MAIL FROM:.
I attached the full debug output.
Thank you. It shows that Exim certainly *thinks* it is writing what it
should, from these lines (lines 295-296 in the
Stephan Gran wrote:
My idea is that the simplicity should probably rule here. These usually
already have an entry in /etc/aliases, redirecting to root. Why not
just put this in /etc/aliases instead:
daemon: :fail: No mail to system accounts
bin: :fail: No mail to system accounts
I don't think so, because I've triple checked that and because mail gets
through with no tls. Maybe some firewall rules on that box but not on
the router. How can I be sure?
Look at your firewall logs.
Tony.
Ok, just in case this helps someone else: I've fixed the long waiting
Hello Jakob,
Jakob Hirsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Sommer wrote:
require_files = $local_part:$home/.forward
I don't think this helps.
Why not? It's a precondition, so the router will not run (and therefore
not defer) if ~/.forward is not accessible.
As I understand the spec the
Indeed, these lines show what I would expect exim to show in my logs.
But in the case of a sender callout/random, it seems it does not, it
seems it logs a refusal on MAIL TO instead of RCPT TO.
What I tested is what you asked me to test, namely, send a mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. And, in this
case,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:19:03AM +0200, Brent Clark wrote:
mail:~# cat /etc/passwd | grep -i uucp
uucp:x:10:10:uucp:/var/spool/uucp:/bin/sh
mail:~#
So my question is, for the Debian distobution, would it be safe to delete
this user, or would anyone have another solution to this problem.
On 2/10/06 3:47 AM, Cédric MARCOUX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to make a spamtrap account on exim using SpamAssassin.
Here is what I wan to do
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] receive a spam that has not been tagged as spam by
SpamAssassin
= the [EMAIL PROTECTED] forward this mail to [EMAIL
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:42:14 -0800, John W. Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/10/06 3:47 AM, C�dric MARCOUX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to make a spamtrap account on exim using SpamAssassin.
Here is what I wan to do
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] receive a spam that has not been
On 10 Feb 2006 at 14:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about
Re: [exim] smtp authorization test :
|...
| Very interesting. Thank you for the script. I presume, then, that exim will
| accept the username and password on one line for LOGIN,
Accepts it, yes. See the comments in spec.txt in the
36 matches
Mail list logo
