On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Chris Lightfoot wrote:
Further inspection with ktrace indicates that something
was setting O_NONBLOCK on the input stream (smtp_in in
smtp_in.c); the first read from the stream will then
typically fail with -EAGAIN, which is treated as an error.
As you say, Exim doesn't
--On 21 March 2006 20:29:13 -0800 Rick Duvall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It seems to me that this could be related to my problem. Perhpas not.
Under the SMTP AUTH, the full e-mail address is used as the username.
How do I get it to use the From address in the MAIL FROM, or at least
the
Hello list!
This message might be somewhat inapropriate for this list, as it isn't
really an Exim question, feel free to reply in private.
I'm running Exim 4.60 with the Sender Rewrite Scheme (SRS)
implementation as found on http://infradead.org/rpr.html.
Slightly adopted over time and works
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 01:11:19PM +, Matthew Frost wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 11:13:55AM +, Philip Hazel wrote:
I have just made a candidate release for 4.61 available here:
OS/Makefile-FreeBSD needs an -lutil added to LIBS= for it to
compile successfully. (FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE
Thanks. I'll see if I can persuade the hosting support team to set one up.
Cheers
Dave Hartburn
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Dave Hartburn wrote:
save /home/dave/mail//dave/.bob/
^
^
This requires the
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 12:08:41PM -0500, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
has anyone gotten the exim-sqlite to run on freebsd off the ports tree?
i keep getting errors trying to get it to work
if anyone has been able to do it, would you share your make args for
exim and sqlite?
Did you build
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 00:18 +, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 12:08:41PM -0500, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
has anyone gotten the exim-sqlite to run on freebsd off the ports tree?
i keep getting errors trying to get it to work
if anyone has been able to do it,
On 2006-03-21 at 18:05 -0500, Hugo Osorio wrote:
also i know that i have to issue the command
#exim4 -bf /path/.forward
or -bF for to be real
i have tried it but nothing happens... as soon as put the command, it stays
forever, without giving to me the shell again..
You need to supply the
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 09:37:24AM +, Philip Hazel wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Chris Lightfoot wrote:
Further inspection with ktrace indicates that something
was setting O_NONBLOCK on the input stream (smtp_in in
smtp_in.c); the first read from the stream will then
typically fail
I am running about 20 servers with default exim configuration that cpanel
writes on the servers.
One of the servers get a very high load when some of the customers send
mails to
His clients through the VBulletin script.
These mails doesn't exceed 20 thousand mail , and when he sends load
--On 22 March 2006 11:00:08 +0100 Sander Smeenk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And my message is never delivered to the mailinglist.
What is the opinion of the masses, am I right to reject mail to return
paths if they don't come from or postmaster?
I'm happy to hear from you guys. Either on-
Quoting Ian Eiloart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
What is the opinion of the masses, am I right to reject mail to return
paths if they don't come from or postmaster?
I don't think you should.
But don't you agree that a return path is only to be used for returning
a message if it can't be delivered,
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Chris Lightfoot wrote:
I believe it's because exim links against libc_r (because
it is linked against libcrypto, which itself is linked
against libc_r).
This does not seem to be a problem on FreeBSD 4.10, which is where I ran
my tests, which do include Exim operating as
Hi All
There is a function that allows me to delete from command line a
recipient in a specific message-id?
I've found on the docs how can add a recipient (-Mar), but not for
delete.
How can it?
Andrea
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
Balzi Andrea wrote:
Hi All
There is a function that allows me to delete from command line a
recipient in a specific message-id?
I've found on the docs how can add a recipient (-Mar), but not for
delete.
How can it?
You can mark a recipient as already delivered.
Note that the headers of the
Hi !!
If you do want to, you could set a variable, then test for it in the
PREDATA ACL. If you reject at that point, it won't affect a callout.
you can also use $message_size to distinguish between callouts and
bounces at rcpt time. If $message_size is greater than zero then
the message is a
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 20:58 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
DW == David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DW http://david.woodhou.se/eximconf/include/acl-greylist has such an
DW example, although it's not wonderfully pretty.
I don't think it looks all that bad, but I wonder if you
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 11:00 +0100, Sander Smeenk wrote:
What is the opinion of the masses, am I right to reject mail to return
paths if they don't come from or postmaster?
Yes, technically you're probably right -- those callouts are broken. But
you probably don't lose much by accepting them
If you do want to, you could set a variable, then test for it in the
PREDATA ACL. If you reject at that point, it won't affect a callout.
This is however a nice idea. I might work that out if i find time ;)
Oh, on second thoughts, you probably don't need to set a variable. The
PREDATA
Phil Pennock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2006-03-21 at 21:53 +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
From time to time, the procmail delivery transports fails because
procmail terminates with a sigsegv. Our problem is that this generates
a permanent error, and the original mail is lost.
How can we
Hi,
I'm trying to write a router that will catch all emails NOT to OR from an email
address on a white-list. I'm using a router rather than an ACL as I don't want
Exim responding with a 500 error to the sender connection. Rather, just have
Exim dump the email with a '/dev/null' transport (I'm
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
Has there been any discussion of patching exim to add greylisting support
(so outside programs are not needed)?
Probably, but I don't think it's worth the hassle. You can do it more
easily and much more flexible with Exim's ACLs, so there's no good to
code this in the
Hi all
I am trying to do the following.
Emails from certain domains to some of my users should get copied and
re-routed to another recipient address (and recpient MTA) while the
original email stayes untouched. Please do not discuss the moral of
this. I'm not fond of it either.
In a ascii art I
Quoting David Woodhouse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Rejecting mail with non-empty reverse-path to your signed addresses
isn't really that important, so if it's a problem you might as well
relax the checking.
It's in *your* config my friend! :P
|{${if and { {!eq {$sender_address}{}} \
|
I have done this:
machine:/var/opt/machine.site.com.co/hosorio# exim4 -bt
/var/opt/machine.site.com.co/hosorio/.forward
/var/opt/machine.site.com.co/hosorio/ejemplo.msg
and, this is the response:
Address rewritten as: /var/opt/machine.site.com.co/hosorio/.forward@
site.com.co
On Mar 22, 2006, at 5:50 AM, Simon Dick wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 00:18 +, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
Did you build it with make -DWITH_SQLITE ?
Sounds like he's using the mail/exim-sqlite port which is basically
the
same, have to admit that I've not tried sqlite on exim at all
I
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Steve Cox wrote:
nonwhitelist:
debug_print = R: not white-listed for sender or recipient
driver = accept
senders = ! lsearch;/etc/exim4/local_MM_whitelist
condition = ! ${if eq [EMAIL
PROTECTED];/etc/exim4/local_MM_whitelist}{1}{0}}
transport = dump_mail
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 16:11 +0100, Sander Smeenk wrote:
Quoting David Woodhouse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Rejecting mail with non-empty reverse-path to your signed addresses
isn't really that important, so if it's a problem you might as well
relax the checking.
It's in *your* config my
Rejecting mail with non-empty reverse-path to your signed addresses
isn't really that important
It's in *your* config my friend! :P
I know. It's not a problem for _me_ --
hah :) got me ;)
An old version of my config, working around bugs in an old version of
Exim. You don't need the
On 21 Mar 2006, at 18:34, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 01:11:19PM +, Matthew Frost wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 11:13:55AM +, Philip Hazel wrote:
I have just made a candidate release for 4.61 available here:
OS/Makefile-FreeBSD needs an -lutil added to LIBS=
On 22/03/06, Giuliano Gavazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21 Mar 2006, at 18:34, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 01:11:19PM +, Matthew Frost wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 11:13:55AM +, Philip Hazel wrote:
I have just made a candidate release for 4.61 available
Exim 4.54:
My Exim is rejecting email from my fax services efax.j2.com:
2006-03-22 17:28:43 H=(efax.j2.com) [216.43.6.98] listed invalid HELO.
2006-03-22 17:28:43 H=(efax.j2.com) [216.43.6.98] temporarily rejected MAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host lookup deferred for reverse lookup check
is there any tutorial on this? the information in the official page is so
huge and too much theory... there is not much practical stuff
thanks for your help
2006/3/22, Hugo Osorio [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have done this:
machine:/var/opt/machine.site.com.co/hosorio# exim4 -bt
Philip Hazel wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Chris Lightfoot wrote:
Further inspection with ktrace indicates that something
was setting O_NONBLOCK on the input stream (smtp_in in
smtp_in.c); the first read from the stream will then
typically fail with -EAGAIN, which is treated as an error.
As
Philip Hazel wrote:
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Chris Lightfoot wrote:
I believe it's because exim links against libc_r (because
it is linked against libcrypto, which itself is linked
against libc_r).
This does not seem to be a problem on FreeBSD 4.10, which is where I ran
my tests, which do
hi,
i am running mandriva 2006 and configured the exim for my mail server, but
can't receive the mails, exim is running as i checked from the processes, any
idea please?
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please
On 23/03/06, Hugo Osorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my .forward only contains this:
---
if $header_to: contains hosorio
then
deliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
endif
You're missing an important line at the top of the .forward file,
which declares it as containing Exim
37 matches
Mail list logo
