Ok thanks.
To be sure I will understood, what I would like is that my members
receive an email with headers like that :
Return-path: err...@domain.tld
From: Service Name cont...@domain.tld
Which seem to not be possible if I use exim thought SMTP 127.0.0.1.
It works only with the -f option (if
Hi,
I'm trying to send email from a script (lib PHP Zend_Mail, from
ZendFramework) to an Exim 4.69 server.
I send thought the localhost:25 SMTP socket (not thought
/usr/sbin/sendmail), and my email contains a Return-Path: header,
but Exim replace it by the content of the From:
Hello,
this it's a Debian distribution, just run dpkg-reconfigure
exim4-config, and choose this type :
- internet site; mail is sent and received directly using SMTP
And... this should be ok.
Olivier
j...@rhinosystemsinc.com a écrit :
Hi,
I'm sure this has been asked numerous times,
Hello,
by using a short SQLITE table you can do something like that on the
remote smtp transport :
interface = ${lookup sqlite {SQLITE_Q_USERINTERFACE}{$value}fail}
helo_data = ${lookup sqlite
{SQLITE_Q_INTERFACEHELO}{$value}{$primary_hostname}}
with :
SQLITE_Q_USERINTERFACE =
Hello,
by using a short SQLITE table you can do something like that on the
remote smtp transport :
interface = ${lookup sqlite {SQLITE_Q_USERINTERFACE}{$value}fail}
helo_data = ${lookup sqlite
{SQLITE_Q_INTERFACEHELO}{$value}{$primary_hostname}}
with :
SQLITE_Q_USERINTERFACE =
only enable sqlite and domainkeys.
The libdomainkeys used is the version 0.68-1 : I wasn't able to build an
amd64 package of the version 0.69.
Does the problem is due to my version of libdomainkeys ?
Thanks in advance,
Olivier Bonvalet
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo
Phil Pennock a écrit :
Can we see the Exim configuration which makes this decision, please? I
suspect the bug is there.
The DK signing happens before sending the data out. There's no
race-condition (that I'm aware of). It sounds more as though you have a
configuration bug where the
Phil Pennock a écrit :
error ... after initial connection:.
The signing happens inline (which is why it's hard for there to be a
race-condition). Exim didn't get as far as signing the message because
the connection was rejected before it could try.
Yahoo.com is temp-failing your IP.
When
Tony Finch a écrit :
I think that $domain will only be set if the transport is handling one
recipient at a time. You can try either setting max_rcpt = 1 on the SMTP
transport, or set address_data = $domain on the router that determines the
transport and use $address_data instead of $domain in
Hello,
I would like emails sent by some hosts to don't been checked
by clamav.
Actually I tried to add before the line malware = * :
accept
hosts = a.a.a.a:b.b.b.b:c.c.c.c
But it seems to doesn't works. Is there a good way to do this ?
Thanks,
Olivier
--
## List details at
Hello,
I have a problem : one exim is listening on port 80, so Apache can't
restart. I really don't know why it do this, but it is not the first time...
Of course, there is not any reference to 80, http or www in
the exim4 conf... :S
What I see :
w30100:~# netstat -lnp | grep exim
tcp0
W B Hacker a écrit :
Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem : one exim is listening on port 80, so Apache can't
restart. I really don't know why it do this, but it is not the first
time...
Of course, there is not any reference to 80, http or www in
the exim4 conf... :S
What I see
mmm, I found this thread too :
http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20030407/msg00049.html
Exactly the same problem, and this explanation seems good :
http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20030407/msg00054.html
Well, just a wild guess, but is it
Hello,
is it possible to do matching for [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
I would like all mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] go to one mailbox,
and all mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to another (so I can't use
catch all).
I try partial matching, but Exim said :
partial is not permitted for lookup type lsearch@
But
Jakob Hirsch a écrit :
Quoting Olivier Bonvalet:
I haven't got enough entropy on my servers, and /dev/random is
blocking.
Now, I'll search to a true solution :
Do you really need TLS for sending out your newsletter?
If not: hosts_avoid_tls is expanded, so you could use
search to a true solution :
- I want to keep /dev/random for security purpose
- really don't want to use a compiled version
I prefer to not use backports, but if I don't found any other
solutions, I'll do.
Thanks all !
Olivier
Olivier Bonvalet a écrit :
Phil Pennock a écrit :
On 2006-03-21
Tony Finch a écrit :
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Phil Pennock wrote:
Local DNS cache
/var/log being a different filesystem from /var/spool/exim/ (not just
for the hints).
Set split_spool_directory.
no_message_logs
Yes I read it too, and add it in the config file.
But I can't test before
Tony Finch a écrit :
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
I was thinking it was needed only for ext2/ext3. For XFS and JFS too ? And
what about ReiserFS ?
It also changes the way Exim scans the spool in a queue run, which can
help performance even on filesystems that handle
Hello,
sorry for this frequent question, but I don't really found what I'm
searching.
So, we actually have 6 small servers (sempron 2.2Ghz, 512Mo RAM, 1 IDE HD)
to send a newsletter once a week to about 400'000 members.
We setup Exim 4.5 (Debian Sarge) on each of them, but can't send more
Stephen Gran a écrit :
You'll need to profile to figure out where yourbottleneck is,
unfortunately. It occurs to me that if 6 servers send 5 emails/second,
and the email is 5k, that's 150k/s, which is roughly the speed of a T1.
If I have guessed right, and you have a T1, then there's not much
Phil Pennock a écrit :
On 2006-03-21 at 17:22 +0100, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
Have I to set anything else to improve perf ?
Local DNS cache, or LDAP slave if using LDAP for lookups.
Ok. I already have a local DNS cache, and don't use LDAP.
If doing many file lookups per recipient
21 matches
Mail list logo
