[exim] Hiding paths in mailer-daemon error reponses

2006-01-09 Thread Chris Corbyn
Hi, See the error message below whilst testing what happens when trying to deliver mail to a non-existent user on an exim setup using virtual domains in an UW-vIMAP style. When sending to a user that does exist it all works fine, and when sending to a false one it fails as it should. I'm

Re: [exim] Hiding paths in mailer-daemon error reponses

2006-01-09 Thread Jakob Hirsch
Chris Corbyn wrote: See the error message below whilst testing what happens when trying to deliver mail to a non-existent user on an exim setup using virtual domains in an UW-vIMAP style. When sending to a user that does exist it My crystal ball is broken, so you should probably write a

Re: [exim] Hiding paths in mailer-daemon error reponses

2006-01-09 Thread Jakob Hirsch
Chris Corbyn wrote: And you should really use a valid return address... --- snip --- This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

Re: [exim] Hiding paths in mailer-daemon error reponses

2006-01-09 Thread Giuliano Gavazzi
On 9 Jan 2006, at 14:53, Jakob Hirsch wrote: Chris Corbyn wrote: And you should really use a valid return address... --- snip --- This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a

Re: [exim] Hiding paths in mailer-daemon error reponses

2006-01-09 Thread Jakob Hirsch
Giuliano Gavazzi wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unrouteable address a temporary DNS problem perhaps? It worked fine here (manually tested on the primary using an empty envelope). I don't know, the message came from wumpus.mythic-beasts.com (sorry for stripping the headers): Subject:

Re: [exim] Hiding paths in mailer-daemon error reponses

2006-01-09 Thread g
On 9 Jan 2006, at 15:33, Jakob Hirsch wrote: Giuliano Gavazzi wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unrouteable address a temporary DNS problem perhaps? It worked fine here (manually tested on the primary using an empty envelope). I don't know, the message came from wumpus.mythic-beasts.com