Hi !!
does exim use compression on tls connections ?
It does not steer it.
If you build OpenSSL 0.9.8 with the zlib-configure option and link
Exim with it, you have got compression.
GnuTLS has no compile time option.
I wrote a patch to enable it by configuration options as well as log
to
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 09:38:40AM +, Philip Hazel wrote:
I do not like the idea of completely disabling by default, because this
would be much more incompatible than just reducing the timeout. It's
probably an Exim 5 thing. (I hope to have retired before Exim 5, BTW.)
Me neither. If
I've been using exim for over a year now with no problems but overnight
exim has started to forward all my mail to my Junk folder.
example from log:
2006-02-17 08:28:59 1FA0z5-0006Ds-0e = /home/cbolton/mail/Junk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] R=userforward T=address_file
The messages hasn't been marked
Hello,
today I received an error message saying:
reason: 501-'[EMAIL PROTECTED]': malformed address: ' may not
follow '[EMAIL PROTECTED])
I asume the error is due to the ' within the .
Is this correct?
Does anybody know why an Outlook-Client would write eMail-
addresses this way?
thanks and
A heads-up for those who use GnuTLS in their Exim: make sure that you
upgrade GnuTLS to deal with this security problem:
URL:http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-0645
http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-0645
Description: Tiny ASN.1 Library
Can you offer any help as to why my hostlist check is failing?
relay_hosts is a hostlist defined as:
hostlist relay_hosts = lsearch;/etc/relayhosts : \
lsearch;/etc/relayhosts.omniquad : \
localhost
The two files /etc/relayhosts.omniquad and /etc/relayhosts contain lists of
IP
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 09:29 +, Chris Bolton wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=7.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,
---^^^---
HTML_90_100,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_COMMENT,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY,
MISSING_SUBJECT autolearn=no version=3.1.0
and the only thing in my
On 17/02/06, Nigel Metheringham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 09:29 +, Chris Bolton wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=7.5
tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,
---^^^---
HTML_90_100,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_COMMENT,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY,
Chris Bolton wrote:
I've been using exim for over a year now with no problems but overnight
exim has started to forward all my mail to my Junk folder.
example from log:
2006-02-17 08:28:59 1FA0z5-0006Ds-0e = /home/cbolton/mail/Junk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] R=userforward T=address_file
The messages
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 18:49 +0800, Chris Purves wrote:
I can't imagine why it wouldn't happen before or why it's not case
sensative...of course I could be completely wrong. :-)
Peter speculated as to why it has kicked now.
Case sensitivity:-
Hello,
acl_check_rcpt looks like this:
denymessage = Restricted characters in address
local_parts = ^[.] : [EMAIL PROTECTED]/|]
Besides I do not get the message Restricted ...
I run exim in testing mode using -bhc with the following results:
snip
rcpt to: '[EMAIL
Chris Purves wrote:
Chris Bolton wrote:
I've been using exim for over a year now with no problems but
overnight exim has started to forward all my mail to my Junk folder.
example from log:
2006-02-17 08:28:59 1FA0z5-0006Ds-0e = /home/cbolton/mail/Junk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] R=userforward
Peter Bowyer wrote:
On 17/02/06, Nigel Metheringham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 09:29 +, Chris Bolton wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=7.5
tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,---^^^---
On 2006-02-17 at 10:28 -, Edward Kay wrote:
relay_hosts is a hostlist defined as:
hostlist relay_hosts = lsearch;/etc/relayhosts : \
lsearch;/etc/relayhosts.omniquad : \
localhost
The two files /etc/relayhosts.omniquad and /etc/relayhosts contain lists of
IP addresses,
Chris Bolton wrote:
Peter Bowyer wrote:
On 17/02/06, Nigel Metheringham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 09:29 +, Chris Bolton wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=7.5
tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,---^^^---
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Galuschka Christoph wrote:
reason: 501-'[EMAIL PROTECTED]': malformed address: ' may not
follow '[EMAIL PROTECTED])
I asume the error is due to the ' within the .
Is this correct?
Yes and no. Quotes are perfectly legal in local parts. You can have, for
example,
On 17/02/06, W B Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Bolton wrote:
Peter Bowyer wrote:
On 17/02/06, Nigel Metheringham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 09:29 +, Chris Bolton wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=7.5
On 2006-02-16 at 13:08 +0200, Brent Clark wrote:
dspam_router:
no_verify
check_local_user
condition = ${if and { \
{!def:h_X-Spam-Flag:} \
{!def:h_X-FILTER-DSPAM:} \
{!eq {$received_protocol}{local}} \
{ = {$message_size}{512k}} \
}\
{1}{0}}
headers_add = X-FILTER-DSPAM: by
trying to build exim 4.60 on soalris 8 with mysql lookups enabled
i have enabled the following in the Makefile
LOOKUP_MYSQL=yes
# lookup styles (e.g. LDAP, MYSQL or PGSQL). LOOKUP_LIBS is included only on
LOOKUP_INCLUDE=-I/home/local/mysql/include
#/usr/local/ldap/include -I
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Galuschka Christoph wrote:
Does anybody know why an Outlook-Client would write eMail-
addresses this way?
Microsoft email software (in particular Outlook and Exchange) is not based
on Internet Standards, but rather has had support for Internet Standards
added on
On 2006-02-16 at 14:33 -0800, John W. Baxter wrote:
I'm rather surprised that in all of Exim's years, no one has written and
contributed a set of SNMP agents (if that's the right SNMP jargon) to
provide this sort of information.
Someone posted details of their set-up a while back; I think
On 2006-02-15 at 11:49 -, Edward Kay wrote:
I want to stop any hosts that I don't explicitly allow from accessing my
SMTP server.
Move the problem out of the Exim configuration logic to keep things
simple. If there is no legitimate reason for any server to directly
contact your host (and
On 2/17/06, Ronan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trying to build exim 4.60 on soalris 8 with mysql lookups enabled
i have enabled the following in the Makefile
LOOKUP_MYSQL=yes
# lookup styles (e.g. LDAP, MYSQL or PGSQL). LOOKUP_LIBS is included only on
I've got my Exim only calling prvs on local_domains now. Thanks David!
But I've run into a different problem. All signed addresses seem to be
for day 100. The hash matches, but then I'm informed that the signature
has expired.
exim -d+expand -be '${prvs [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
expanding: [EMAIL
Rodrigo Castro wrote:
On 2/17/06, Ronan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trying to build exim 4.60 on soalris 8 with mysql lookups enabled
i have enabled the following in the Makefile
LOOKUP_MYSQL=yes
# lookup styles (e.g. LDAP, MYSQL or PGSQL). LOOKUP_LIBS is included only on
Hi,
My boss today asked me to mirror a newcomers all sent emails to his mailbox.
How do I do this in exim 4.52?
Awaiting your answers.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
El 17/02/2006, a las 17:07, Sub Zero escribió:
Hi,
My boss today asked me to mirror a newcomers all sent emails to his
mailbox.
How do I do this in exim 4.52?
Hi :)
Try with this:
$ cat /etc/.filter
unseen deliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bye!
--
Santi Saez
--
## List details at
Sub Zero wrote:
Hi,
My boss today asked me to mirror a newcomers all sent emails to his mailbox.
How do I do this in exim 4.52?
Awaiting your answers.
Hi all,
I've been looking at this for the past two weeks as I also need to add
an archive solution to my existing exim infrastructure.
Hi,
I'm running the current stable version of Debian and the packaged
version of Exim 4. I'm switching from 3 and I have this problem with
lsearch that I just can't figure out.
It's a very simple scenario. I want to block hosts that are
listed in a file. The file is in /etc/spam_hosts and has
On Friday 10 February 2006 16:13, Philip Hazel wrote:
I have now got round to looking at this. On my Linux box, where Exim is
compiled with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE, the quota is
NOT limited to 2G. I have just run a test with quota=3G, and I end up
with a maildirsize that
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 10:25 -0500, Chris Meadors wrote:
I've got my Exim only calling prvs on local_domains now. Thanks David!
But I've run into a different problem. All signed addresses seem to be
for day 100. The hash matches, but then I'm informed that the signature
has expired.
If I wanted to add a condition to an ACL
statement that would limit application of the
satement to local SMTP processes I would say:
hosts = :
What I'm trying to figure out is how I could do
that same sort of thing in a redirect router so
that the router would decline if the message was
not
Jason Meers wrote:
Sub Zero wrote:
Hi,
My boss today asked me to mirror a newcomers all sent emails to his
mailbox.
How do I do this in exim 4.52?
Awaiting your answers.
Hi all,
I've been looking at this for the past two weeks as I also need to add
an archive solution to my existing
Sven Hartge wrote:
Exim advertises STARTTLS in the EHLO response but upon sending the
STARTTLS command, nothing happens, it looks some client input is
expected. Not if connected via client nor by hand (telnet).
You should see a 220 TLS go ahead if you use telnet to debug.
My guess: Your
Jürgen Herz wrote:
Sven Hartge wrote:
Exim advertises STARTTLS in the EHLO response but upon sending the
STARTTLS command, nothing happens, it looks some client input is
expected. Not if connected via client nor by hand (telnet).
You should see a 220 TLS go ahead if you use telnet to
Host A relays mail to host B. A receives mail from outside the
network. When A accepts a mail for some unexistent recipient in B, the
mail is frozen on A.
Given that the condition of unexistent will remain on B, how can I
say A that generate a bounce when B reject the message, instead of
frozing
On 17/02/06, Maykel Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Host A relays mail to host B. A receives mail from outside the
network. When A accepts a mail for some unexistent recipient in B, the
mail is frozen on A.
Given that the condition of unexistent will remain on B, how can I
say A that generate
El vie, 17-02-2006 a las 20:58 +, Peter Bowyer escribió:
On 17/02/06, Maykel Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Host A relays mail to host B. A receives mail from outside the
network. When A accepts a mail for some unexistent recipient in B, the
mail is frozen on A.
Given that the
This is a follow-up to my previous message about lsearch. Running exim
with -d+all, I came across this piece:
...
16:42:18 3171 check hosts = lsearch;/etc/spam_hosts
16:42:18 3171 ---0 Get 0x80f994040 string.c 349
16:42:18 3171 sender host name required, to match against
On 16.02.2006 21:09 (+0100), David Saez Padros wrote:
does exim use compression on tls connections ?
Isn't compression an elementary part of encryption, to avoid data
redundancy and make cracking the encryption unnecessarily easy? And
doesn't an ideally encrypted string have a maximal (or was it
Um 21:33 Uhr am 17.02.06 schrieb Jürgen Herz:
Sven Hartge wrote:
Exim advertises STARTTLS in the EHLO response but upon sending the
STARTTLS command, nothing happens, it looks some client input is
expected. Not if connected via client nor by hand (telnet).
You should see a 220 TLS go
Um 04:43 Uhr am 18.02.06 schrieb W B Hacker:
With fewer than ten servers running Exim, I cannot say for *sure*, but
with OpenSSL on FreeBSD this has never been an issue for us with Exim,
Qmail, Courier-MTA, DBMail, several IMAP/POP daemons, or anything else
that uses SSL/TLS/or SSH.
*BSD
Yves Goergen wrote:
On 16.02.2006 21:09 (+0100), David Saez Padros wrote:
does exim use compression on tls connections ?
Isn't compression an elementary part of encryption, to avoid data
redundancy and make cracking the encryption unnecessarily easy?
As used in SSL/TLS and many other
Sven Hartge wrote:
Um 04:43 Uhr am 18.02.06 schrieb W B Hacker:
With fewer than ten servers running Exim, I cannot say for *sure*, but
with OpenSSL on FreeBSD this has never been an issue for us with Exim,
Qmail, Courier-MTA, DBMail, several IMAP/POP daemons, or anything else
that uses
Um 07:26 Uhr am 18.02.06 schrieb W B Hacker:
Sven Hartge wrote:
With fewer than ten servers running Exim, I cannot say for *sure*, but
with OpenSSL on FreeBSD this has never been an issue for us with Exim,
Qmail, Courier-MTA, DBMail, several IMAP/POP daemons, or anything else
that uses
Hi Santi
My boss today asked me to mirror a newcomers all sent emails to his
mailbox.
How do I do this in exim 4.52?
Hi :)
Try with this:
$ cat /etc/.filter
unseen deliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have created a system filter like this:
if ($sender_address MATCHES [EMAIL PROTECTED]) then
Sub Zero wrote:
and it is working okay. But I want to remove the header line
Return-Receipt-To: ... only in this unseen delivery filter (if you call
Section 42.6 of the Exim spec tells you how to do that.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details
Is there any way to log the smtp authentications attempts and results,
and better, into a sql table?
In order to implement the n days of inactivity blocks your account
or stuff like that?
Thank you
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
Maykel Moya wrote:
Given that the condition of unexistent will remain on B, how can I
say A that generate a bounce when B reject the message, instead of
frozing it.
That is the default operation, so the config must have been changed in
some strange way. Maybe there's no dnslookup router, so A
This is yet another follow-up. I felt adventurous enough to go into the
Exim source code. And what I found was this:
/* Not a query-style lookup; must ensure the host name is present, and
then we do a check on the name and all its aliases. */
if (sender_host_name == NULL)
{
Jürgen Herz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Now I'm quite puzzled, but after some searches it looks like a common
problem. ldd says exim4 is linked against libgnutls.so.11 as well as
libssl.so.0.9.7.
[...]
That's because ldd lists indirect linking. e.g. for exim this can be
caused by:
exim
51 matches
Mail list logo
