I have uploaded Exim 4.75 RC3 to:
ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/
ChangeLog can be found at:
http://git.exim.org/exim.git/blob/552193f0d6f4281f0d61d359f126d2236edcd181:/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
I currently suspect that this will be the last RC and that I will
release Exim 4.75
On 2011-03-02 at 16:25 +0100, Narcis Garcia - GiLUG wrote:
I send mail from an Exim4 installation, and it's rejected from some MTA
servers with:
Helo command rejected: Host not found
because Exim announces with the short hostname instead of the specified
in /etc/mailname (FQDN)
If I run:
On 2011-03-03 at 10:00 +0100, Joachim Astel wrote:
Setup a perl script at /etc/exim4/mailheaderadd.pl, which contains:
sub mailheaderadd {
my $xsource = $ENV{'X-SOURCE'};
This may be problematic -- using a hyphen in an environment variable
renders it inaccessible to shell and might
On 2011-03-04 at 07:43 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 15:42:55 -0500, Phil Pennock
exim-us...@spodhuis.org wrote:
There's two parts: Exim, and the Debian integration of Exim. Debian
does the stuff which uses all the M4 macros.
There ain't no m4 around the Debian exim packages
On 2011-03-05 at 13:13 -0600, René Berber wrote:
deny message = DKIM: Message with invalid/missing signature
sender_domains = gmail.com:paypal.com:ebay.com:$dkim_signers
dkim_status = none:invalid:fail
Simple, isn't it?
But all gmail messages are being rejected and I see
On 2011-03-06 at 20:15 +0100, Chack wrote:
I am running Exim4 with virtual users from a mysql databse. Mails are
delivered through courier maildrop into the maildirs. Everythign works
fine except that if a mailbox goes over the quota, maildrop just fails
with error code 75 and exim will defer
On 2011-03-06 at 16:33 -0600, René Berber wrote:
On 3/6/2011 3:55 PM, Phil Pennock wrote:
How about if you add to the deny:
log_message = DKIM: $dkim_cur_signer / $dkim_domain / $dkim_key_testing /
$dkim_verify_status / $dkim_verify_reason
Do you get something more useful out
On 2011-03-06 at 17:52 -0600, René Berber wrote:
On 3/6/2011 5:43 PM, Phil Pennock wrote:
Sorry for changing my email address, I'm only subscribed with one, not
the other.
Your configuration so far looks sane.
Can you post the mail headers from rejectlog ?
Here they are:
There's
On 2011-03-06 at 16:33 -0600, René Berber wrote:
On 3/6/2011 3:55 PM, Phil Pennock wrote:
How about if you add to the deny:
log_message = DKIM: $dkim_cur_signer / $dkim_domain / $dkim_key_testing /
$dkim_verify_status / $dkim_verify_reason
Do you get something more useful out
On 2011-03-07 at 09:15 -0700, The Doctor wrote:
I would like to send the configure file without the conmments.
How can I do this?
grep '^ *[^# ]' /path/to/exim.conf stripped-config
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
On 2011-03-07 at 18:00 -0500, Phil Pennock wrote:
You probably want to add a domains = +local_domains restriction to
both of those and move them to be the first Routers, or put them
immediately after the dnslookup Router.
Well, actually you probably want them after the amavis Router
On 2011-03-07 at 13:24 -0700, The Doctor wrote:
begin routers
These are tried *in order*. Please read:
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch03.html#SECTprocaddress
check_system_aliases:
driver = redirect
allow_fail
allow_defer
data =
; you'll be rejecting messages that are
technically well-formed, but it's your system and you get to choose what
you accept (unless you have contracts with customers saying otherwise).
The easy way to test these things:
$ cat EOM test.eml
From: Phil Pennock p...@example.com, Snert sn...@example.com
On 2011-03-13 at 11:35 +1000, Ted Cooper wrote:
I've been getting a LOT of errors similar to the following in my logs. I
haven't cared all that much since after some initial quick checking,
every one of the connections ended up being a spam bot that would have
been blocked by other means
On 2011-03-13 at 18:12 -0400, Paul Schreiber wrote:
(the sendmail call was missing angle brackets in the previous version of this
message)
New subscribers are moderated by default; I've cleared your moderation
flag and I didn't let the previous version through.
When called from the command
On 2011-03-14 at 01:26 -0400, Paul Schreiber wrote:
This fails in exim, but succeeds in Postfix:
/usr/sbin/sendmail -i -t -f foo: bar \i...@foo.ca\ some...@gmail.com
note the colon after
foo:
This succeeds in both:
/usr/sbin/sendmail
Folks,
During the RC process for Exim 4.75, we were notified of a possible
issue in Exim, as part of a general much software has this problem
alert, by CERT. The issue relates to STARTTLS and command injection,
as described by Wietse Venema at:
On 2011-03-18 at 15:49 +, Ron White wrote:
I've compiled Exim a couple of times on Cent, and even Slackware and had
no problems that a few minutes with my friend 'Google' could not fix.
However, my Ubuntu build has thrown up an error I cannot get to the
bottom of. When I run make I get:
On 2011-03-18 at 11:14 -0700, William King wrote:
mailman_router:
driver= accept
domains = +mm_domains
What is the definition of the mm_domains domainlist, please?
transport = mailman_transport
And what is the definition of this transport?
-Phil
--
Folks,
This month, RFC 6176 was published:
Prohibiting Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) Version 2.0
Is there anyone depending upon being able to speak SSLv2 instead of
SSLv3 or TLS to a remote server?
Note: GnuTLS does not implement SSLv2, and never has. So this only
affects OpenSSL users.
You can
, as set out by those who
provide the resources that run the list.
Regards,
-Phil Pennock
pgp253ExMjgGB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http
On 2011-04-07 at 12:48 +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
I fixed other encoding issues I had by adding :rfc2047: in as follows
${quote_pgsql:rfc2047:$h_subject:}
Assuming you mean ${rfc2047:...} then that encodes data. I'd expect you
to normally want to decode data. As written though, that does not
On 2011-04-08 at 19:27 +0200, Jaap Winius wrote:
Is it possible to configure an Exim4 server (exim4-daemon-heavy 4.72-6
on Debian squeeze) to offer an authenticated SMTP service with
end-to-end SSL encryption while authenticating the passwords with
Kerberos?
Yes. But I can't help you
On 2011-04-12 at 18:51 +0200, Aarno Aukia wrote:
I wanted to add a python variant to
http://wiki.exim.org/AuthenticatedSmtpUsingIMAP, but the wiki page is
immutable. Who can enable editing the page or who wants to add my 0.02
?
Uhm, the Perl on that page is designed to be run by Exim, when
On 2011-04-14 at 10:40 +0200, Matthias Hank wrote:
/etc/exim/exim.conf
(exim-4.63-5.el5_6.2 on RHEL 5.6)
This Mail is delivered correctly BUT exim only logs the received part
of this mail =
The delivery line and the Completed line is missing and is not logged.
This was a bug in 4.73, when
On 2011-04-15 at 14:38 +0200, Luca Bertoncello wrote:
Now, as I know, DKIM (and DomainKey before) should solve the problem of a
forward, which can fail with SPF.
Could someone say me, why I get these errors?
Mailing-lists tend to edit Subject: lines (see [exim] above) and add
footers:
--
On 2011-04-17 at 08:27 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
En Snare ensn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi -- I have exim4 correctly signing with DKIM signatures but I would also
like to add a DomainKey signature. I am running Exim 4.72 on Ubuntu 10.10.
I understand that DomainKeys support doesn't come
On 2011-04-28 at 13:59 -0400, Seth Dillingham wrote:
Samson sends email 'from' quite a few different addresses. It can have any
number of group projects, and each group project has a name, and the names
become part of a cluster of associated email accounts, such as
project1-s...@example.com
On 2011-05-03 at 21:25 +1200, Tony Meyer wrote:
If a message contains a DKIM signature header where the identity field
begins with a slash, like
/free_electronic_cigare...@dogg.testcredit.net, then entries like
the following appear in the paniclog:
2011-04-25 13:41:50 1QEL6r-0007jM-VV
On 2011-05-05 at 19:40 +1200, Tony Meyer wrote:
accept
dkim_status= none
sender_domains = KNOWN_DKIM_SIGNERS
dkim_signers = KNOWN_DKIM_SIGNERS
condition = ${if
match_domain{$sender_address_domain}{$dkim_cur_signer}}
log_message= Possible DKIM Forgery:
Phil Pennock p...@exim.org. Please use your own discretion
in assessing what trust paths you might have to this uid. This email
should be signed with the same key, which should provide some
authentication for the above patching instructions and, because of git's
security model, some protection
On 2011-05-07 at 09:08 +1000, Ted Cooper wrote:
On 07/05/11 08:51, Tony Meyer wrote:
condition = ${if eqi{$sender_address_domain}{$dkim_cur_signer}}
Unfortunately, this didn't fix the problem. I get the paniclog entry
even using this ACL:
Is this at all related?
On 2011-05-08 at 12:20 +0200, techni...@dreamhosting.fr wrote:
Hi have a problem when I test emails on *dkim-t...@altn.com
I have this error :
*
x-vbr=hardfail header.vbr-info=mydomain.here (domain not recognized);
I do not find how to solve this problem, there are only few post in
honestly expect much
review, but now's your chance to scream stop!.
Checksums below. Detached PGP signatures in .asc files.
Thank you for your patience, testing and feedback,
- -Phil Pennock, pp The Exim Maintainers.
SHA1(exim-4.76_RC2.tar.bz2)= 5f9e829330ead59cf91b24ee4728089f730e7224
SHA1(exim
On 2011-05-10 at 01:13 +0200, Luciano Rinetti wrote:
Thank You
i see the DKIM signature in my header.
There is a method i can use to test by miself ?
My notes include these DKIM testing services; I suspect that most, if
not all, will DKIM-sign their responses, letting you both verify your
On 2011-05-11 at 14:55 -0700, carbonated beverage wrote:
I saw the smtp_accept_max_per_connection variable is not subject to
string expansion -- are there plans to change this? If not, what have
others with this kind of requirement done to work around it?
No plans which I'm aware of.
Use
On 2011-05-12 at 15:47 -0700, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
[ quoting Phil Pennock: ]
So this just means that, for whatever certification organisations
altn.com is using when assessing via VBR, you haven't paid one of them
to be included.
Right, and I agree it's not a concern unless someone
On 2011-05-12 at 22:28 +1000, Ted Cooper wrote:
On 12/05/11 19:02, Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2011-05-11 at 14:55 -0700, carbonated beverage wrote:
I saw the smtp_accept_max_per_connection variable is not subject to
Use ACLs; set a counter in the connect ACL in an $acl_c_foo variable
On 2011-05-19 at 11:09 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
I'm mostly familiar with LEMONADE in the context of IMAP. What needs
doing on the SMTP side?
BDAT, BURL (and thus urlauth validation, a policy engine, etc)
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim
On 2011-05-19 at 09:58 +, Ian Eiloart wrote:
But no, I don't see a sign of 5.0, or even discussion of what
desirable radical changes would justify a major version number change.
It might just be that we run out of minor version numbers!
From the June 2010 maintainers meet-up summary notes
On 2011-05-19 at 12:35 +0100, Dominic Benson wrote:
On 19/05/11 11:50, Phil Pennock wrote:
New queuing system refers to an approach to scale up the spool directory
to something more queue-like, with segregated admin-defined queues (eg,
big_freemail_provider_x). This is because while Exim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 2011-05-20 at 09:36 +, Ian Eiloart wrote:
On 19 May 2011, at 19:05, W B Hacker wrote:
If nothing has reverted, I read that as a U Cambridge server having
accepted 8BITMIME with a 250-Ok many years and versions ago.
It doesn't
On 2011-05-19 at 14:10 +, W B Hacker wrote:
Phil Pennock wrote:
At present, there's split_spool_directory, which divides things up with
one level of hashing, and then some people script their own queue-runner
launchers, running in parallel over sub-trees of the split spool instead
On 2011-06-09 at 09:36 -0700, Todd Lyons wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Patrick Boutilier bouti...@ednet.ns.ca
wrote:
Didn't try removing the quotes but did come up with a solution. I believe
that the messages causing segfaults were probably due to the length of
$spam_report . So
On 2011-06-10 at 04:38 -0400, Phil Pennock wrote:
Note that the *default* message for the ratelimit response contains
At present, the only change I see to make is to ensure that the
ratelimit default message is used when expansion failed. We'll still
need more to go on, otherwise.
s
On 2011-06-13 at 00:32 +, Michael Jimenez wrote:
So I've been looking at my mail server mainlog for the past couple of days
watching mail come in and out, I've noticed that this Microsoft address keeps
failing to verify:
You're using sender *callout* verification to systems not under
On 2011-06-14 at 20:58 +0100, Graeme Fowler wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 00:24 -0400, Phil Pennock wrote:
You're using sender *callout* verification to systems not under your
administrative control.
Really? Not necessarily.
Not necessarily, but highly likely given that the address which
On 2011-06-20 at 04:56 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
Recently a free-standing server disappeared after its Exim configuration
was changed and before a Save of the changes was done :-(
I'm failing to parse what exactly you mean by this?
Eventually I discovered that the first host name,
On 2011-06-20 at 13:44 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
I'm trying to write a redirect router that sends data into Redmine's email
handler, which needs commas in some of the parameters, but the technique
mentioned above appears not to work. I have the following router (changed
to use /bin/echo to
On 2011-06-21 at 09:20 +, Thew, Alan wrote:
Has anyone got exim and cdb working together on a 64 bit OS (RHEL 6 in this
case)? cdb is really old now...
My primary dev box is my colo machine, which runs 64-bit FreeBSD and I
use CDB for most of my configuration files.
Exim's CDB support is
On 2011-06-24 at 05:59 +, Bruce A. Bergman wrote:
[ headers_remove not working ]
remote_smtp:
debug_print = T: remote_smtp for $local_part@$domain
driver = smtp
headers_remove = X-FDA:X-Panda:X-Spam-Summary
Does it work if you remove the quotes?
If so, please file a bug (but you'll
On 2011-06-22 at 15:06 -0400, Bryan Rawlins wrote:
I have been working with the coordinators for the Virus Bulletin
Spam test on an issue where our servers were returning 421 Unexpected
failure, please try later in response to some messages relayed to us
through the competition server.
Folks,
Does anyone have a basic RPM .spec file for Exim they'd care to share,
please? Not covers every possibility, for packaging across multiple
OSes with every library optional but just this works for me and is
simple enough to change readily.
Thanks,
-Phil
PS: anyone think there should be a
On 2011-06-28 at 17:04 +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
I would like to know if this configuration sample is for Exim 3 or Exim
4: http://www.bastard.net/~kos/mailrouter/sample-configure
Exim 3.
Separates sections with end, has the sections in a fixed order, has a
separate concept of
On 2011-07-13 at 10:14 -0700, David Mathog wrote:
Nevertheless, none of the headers defined by add_header in any of
those many configuration files actually show up in the messages.
Instead the only headers created are those defined in exim.conf in this
section:
SpamAssassin's added headers
On 2011-07-14 at 08:54 -0700, David Mathog wrote:
I don't have a grasp on the relative benefits of doing the spam checking
in these two different ways, beyond the observation that the sa-exim one
ends up with the headers spamassassin is configured to add. Since there
is usually no free lunch,
On 2011-07-19 at 02:34 +, Matt Justin wrote:
I have cpanel/exim setup to send mail for specific urls over specific ips.
This is working fine except when there was mail queued up due to a ISP
temporary deferring it. Exim did its job and deferred sending the emails and
they sat in queue
On 2011-07-21 at 09:54 +0100, Tim Watts wrote:
The redirect router is less desireable as I have to handle mail I no
longer want instead of being able to reject it at SMPT time (whereby the
spammer who now has it might stop bothering me).
Err, no.
There are typically two runs through the
On 2011-07-21 at 16:40 +0100, Oliver Howe wrote:
suppose i have a message file that i have saved as a text file as
1QjuGG-0005hY-AE-H
and I want to send it again. Can I put it back into the
/var/spool/exim4/input/1 directory?
You've only got the headers. Exim uses the -H file for the
On 2011-07-22 at 18:43 +0200, Hubertus von Fuerstenberg wrote:
The ldap query for route_data looks up the mailhost and yields either
imap.ise.fraunhofer.de or notesmail.ise.fraunhofer.de, so I thought
of using route_data in the selection of transport but I always get the
error that
On 2011-07-22 at 14:02 -0600, Kirk Friggstad wrote:
Everything works pretty much as expected - incoming mail gets saved in the
mailattachments directory, and the perl script fires and gets the entire
message on STDIN with no problems. However, I haven't been able to find how
to find out the
On 2011-07-22 at 14:34 +0100, Oliver Howe wrote:
2011-07-22 09:55:11 Start queue run: pid=28711
# date
Fri Jul 22 14:17:58 BST 2011
#
# ps ax | grep 28711
28711 ?S 0:00 /usr/sbin/exim4 -q
#
does this mean I have a queue running since 09:55 (its now 14:17) and I can
only
On 2011-07-23 at 15:47 +0100, Tim Watts wrote:
system_aliases:
[...]
data = ${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/etc/exim4/domains/$domain/aliases}}
3a) However (and it is logical) a + form on an alias cannot be blocked
with the user level blacklist.
Depends. You can *preserve* the +suffix
On 2011-07-25 at 18:57 +0400, Ivan Usachev wrote:
Hi! tell me please, is it possible to implement such a scheme
exim authorization cram-md5 through sasl2 in ldap
Should be, yes.
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch36.html
Chapter 36 - The cyrus_sasl authenticator
The
On 2011-08-05 at 10:54 -0400, Brent Bloxam wrote:
I run exim in a split queue setup (inbound daemon is queue only) along
with MailScanner. Is sender_host_address preserved or would the message
be considered locally submitted when picked up by the outbound daemon?
Depends on how it's
On 2011-08-12 at 10:43 +0100, Christian Gregoire wrote:
I bumped into this with a client of mine and now that he has removed the type
99
filtering on his firewall, everything's smooth. But is there a way to specify
some sort of timeout in an ACL ? defer_ok ? delay ? Unfortunatelly I can't
On 2011-08-15 at 22:24 +0100, Christian Gregoire wrote:
But ... in the last end, shouldn't it be Exim's responsability to check for
timeout ? There's already this possibility with callouts (verify =
sender/callout=5s) or ${readsocket ...} expansion item for example. So why
not
with SPF
On 2011-08-18 at 16:13 -0300, Reinaldo Matukuma wrote:
This returns me:
2011-08-18 16:05:23 Exim configuration error:
two client authenticators (client_plain_1 and client_plain_2) have the same
public name (PLAIN)
2011-08-18 16:05:23 Exim configuration error:
two client
On 2011-08-23 at 12:41 +0100, De Ranter, Nico wrote:
I'm receiving a large number of spam messages from addresses of the form
name@ip-address. I'm already blocking addresses of the form
@[ip-address] using 'allow_domain_literals=false' but this doesn't seem
to stop @ip-address.
As long as
On 2011-08-24 at 10:37 +0100, De Ranter, Nico wrote:
Hi Phil,
when I try
exim -bt test@110.1.1.1
I get
R: smarthost for test@110.1.1.1
test@110.1.1.1
router = smarthost, transport = remote_smtp_smarthost
host x.x.x.x [x.x.x.x]
(the server is
On 2011-08-24 at 16:44 +0100, Colin wrote:
2011-08-22 13:18:16 1QvTSJ-hJ-Rx ** sen...@domain1.tld
sen...@domain1.tld R=static_route T=remote_smtp_smart: all hosts have
been failing for a long time and were last tried after this message arrived
Are you sure that it's the sender address
On 2011-08-24 at 19:40 -0700, Jim Pazarena wrote:
Is there an acl which can examine the From: name?
Yes, acl_smtp_data. Remember that the RFC822/2822/5322 headers come in
as part of the message body, after the DATA verb. So in acl_smtp_rcpt,
you haven't yet seen the From: header.
Also, note
On 2011-08-24 at 22:51 -0400, Frank DeChellis wrote:
Hosts = !+host_list1 : !+host_list2
If I understand correctly again, I am setting up a resultant NAND function
by negating the two lists that are ³OR² together. Boolean Algebra 201.
How would I create a ³NOR² function between the two
On 2011-08-25 at 07:45 +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 00:50, Frank Elsner frank.els...@tu-berlin.dewrote:
One idea might be to send bounces and only bounces from a different
interface/IP.
This avoids blacklisting of the interface/IP used to send all other
normal
On 2011-08-25 at 09:03 +0100, De Ranter, Nico wrote:
If I understand correctly the special_ipv4_bad part is just there so I can
make some exceptions right?
It's IP addresses we refuse to deliver to, even if that's what the DNS
resolves to.
$ exim -bP +special_ipv4_bad
hostlist
On 2011-08-25 at 16:28 -0400, Frank DeChellis wrote:
Does the sender_domain condition test check the domain name in ³from:²,
³return-path:² or ³envelope-from:²
The condition is sender_domains, with a trailing s.
Per the documentation:
8 cut here
On 2011-08-29 at 13:13 +, Matt Justin wrote:
I have recently opened a ticket with cpanel support and it was escalated to
there dev team and this behavior was confirmed.
We have found the following to be true: When 2 or more domians/ips are setup
to use /etc/mailhelo
/etc/mailips and
On 2011-08-29 at 15:24 +0200, tower wrote:
Can You tell me what can I do to be unblacklisted in gmail spam filter?
For one week ago I had open mail system and some spam passed from one of
my servers. Today I filled out the form at
On 2011-08-29 at 22:06 +, Matt Justin wrote:
what so u need to see my exim.conf?
Yes. That's pretty essential to debugging problems, since it's the
exim.conf which dictates how Exim is supposed to deal with any
particular problem.
-Phil
--
## List details at
On 2011-08-30 at 11:49 -0400, Dean Brooks wrote:
What you are seeing in Exim with regards to having to set
connection_max_messages=1 in order to ensure that the interface=
transport option is honored properly is indeed the case. Without it,
other messages waiting on the queue will get sent
On 2011-09-01 at 11:05 -0700, Jeff Lasman wrote:
# Accept hosts who are polite enough to wait rather than just send, as
spammers do
accept hosts = *
delay = 3s
Is there a community concensus on whether or no this is reasonable?
This is email. There's no community consensus
Today, OpenSSL issued a security advisory:
http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20110906.txt
OpenSSL is one of the two available implementations of the TLS protocol
in Exim. The other is GnuTLS. In the output of { exim -bV } is a line
Support for:; if it does not include OpenSSL then you are
On 2011-09-07 at 00:58 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/filter_ch03.html
the bottom RIGHT link (Next) has:-
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/filter_ch04.html
but I continually get a 404 error.
There is no
On 2011-09-07 at 12:57 +1000, Ted Cooper wrote:
I'm assuming that Phil, the person most likely to be in contact with
Tahini mailops, is based in the UK and as such is probably asleep since
it's 2am-3am there.
I'm not the Tahini mailop, that's someone else who frequents this list,
and probably
On 2011-09-07 at 16:50 +0100, Christian Gregoire wrote:
Actually, in Graeme example (below), I can't see where Exim retrieves the
relay
host(s) to check against.
warn domains = +filter_domains:+relay_to_domains
!verify = recipient/callout=30s,defer_ok,no_cache,use_sender
set
On 2011-09-07 at 18:51 +0300, Face wrote:
cannot start exim with this error:
2011-09-07 18:07:14 Exim configuration error in line 821 of
/etc/mail.d/exim.d/exim.conf:
error in ACL: unknown ACL condition/modifier in demime = *
You built Exim without demime support.
Either build with
On 2011-09-08 at 10:14 +0100, ROGERS Richard wrote:
Is it possible to vary the message size limit according to where the message
is received from? I've had a bit of a look at this but it appears that
message_size_limit is set globally - is this correct, or is there another way?
On 2011-09-07 at 20:30 +0200, Pawel Rutkowski wrote:
Today i try to compile and run Exim 4.76 version on my Centos 5
64bit. After compile i thought that everythink work OK, but from time to
time i get in kernel:
exim[4921] general protection rip:46b660 rsp:7fffe3f34e10 error:0
On 2011-09-08 at 11:15 +0100, ROGERS Richard wrote:
Phil Pennock wrote:
=
On 2011-09-08 at 10:14 +0100, ROGERS Richard wrote:
Is it possible to vary the message size limit according to where the
message is received from? I've had a bit of a look at this but it appears
On 2011-09-08 at 18:13 -0400, Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2011-09-08 at 11:15 +0100, ROGERS Richard wrote:
Phil Pennock wrote:
=
On 2011-09-08 at 10:14 +0100, ROGERS Richard wrote:
Is it possible to vary the message size limit according to where the
message is received from? I've
On 2011-09-09 at 20:54 -0700, Yan Seiner wrote:
I am trying to set up a pipe to a shell script.
rt_router:
driver = accept
local_part_prefix_optional
local_part_prefix = rt-
transport = rt_transport
rt_transport:
driver = pipe
command = /usr/local/bin/rtcat
The goal is
On 2011-09-10 at 23:11 +, Steffen Heil (Mailinglisten) wrote:
I have a text-file that I use for lookups like this:
set acl_m1 = ${lookup{a...@b.de}lsearch*@{filename}{$value}fail}
then I extract some information from this:
${extract{key}{$acl_m1}}
Also, I need to extract a password
On 2011-09-11 at 07:16 +0200, Pawel Rutkowski wrote:
Hello,
Else:
Configure your system to permit setuid programs to dump core; set
rlimits accordingly; grab coredump, run:
$ gdb /path/to/exim /path/to/exim.core
and issue the bt command, which will tell you where it died, and
On 2011-09-11 at 08:52 +, Steffen Heil (Mailinglisten) wrote:
While this is no answer to my question, it is yet way better.
That's why I offered it. :)
4) driver = redirect data = ${expand:${extract{forward}{$address_data}}}
Incoming mail for a...@c.de was correctly redirected to
On 2011-09-11 at 00:40 -0500, Pedro Mansilla wrote:
Simple questions are:
Is domainkeys (dk) disabled on exim 4.70 and up?
It was removed; DomainKeys support was only ever experimental, and the
world moved on, to DKIM. See also the README.UPDATING file with Exim,
which calls out explicitly
On 2011-09-11 at 18:49 +0200, Pawel Rutkowski wrote:
Yes, now more information:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0046b660 in smtp_read_response
(inblock=0x718bad50,buffer=0x718b9d10 220 proksima.home.pl ESMTP
IdeaSmtpServer v0.70 ready.\r, size=4041, okdigit=50, timeout=300) at
On 2011-09-11 at 16:19 +, Steffen Heil (Mailinglisten) wrote:
Whitespaces shoud not matter as long as the string is double quotet, right?
Like this: pass=ab\$c d\!ef
That gets the whitespace into the string which is used as the result of
the later expansion; without looking at where it's
On 2011-09-11 at 15:59 -0500, Pedro Mansilla wrote:
Hi Phil, thanks for the answers.
Ok, so lets say that I need both. What was the last version that supported
both as Experimental. I mean the SRC. And what should I do or need to
compile it and have both working and signing out messages.
On 2011-09-15 at 14:01 -0400, Nerigal . wrote:
exim but I would know if it is possible to compare the domain in the
$sender_adresse_domain and or ${domain:$h_From:} value with the owned in
local_domain and reject email if it doesn’t match
I tried something like
condition = ${if
On 2011-09-16 at 15:29 +0200, Patryk wrote:
I'd like to configure one user to send with a different qualified domain than
the default one. Is this possible? I couldn't find a way to achieve this in
the
documents of exim.
qualify_domain is applied too early and is constant; also, it won't
801 - 900 of 1520 matches
Mail list logo
