Re: [exim] secondary MX: allow only a set of users

2007-12-28 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 02:15:48PM -0800, Phil Pennock wrote: On 2007-12-20 at 14:23 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Look for 'smtp_reserve_hosts'. With this, you can allow the backup MX to connect to the master even when the master is already 4xx'ing other hosts because of things like

Re: [exim] secondary MX: allow only a set of users

2007-12-28 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2007-12-28 at 15:32 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: This will still work with receiver callout verification, for the very simple reason that callout verification is actually cached. It will be problematic to receive spam to non-existing email addresses which hadn't been seen before during the

Re: [exim] secondary MX: allow only a set of users

2007-12-22 Thread Leonardo Boselli
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Phil Pennock wrote: On 2007-12-22 at 02:46 +0100, Leonardo Boselli wrote: i also added _before_ this one the routers that use a local_part_prefix This way such prefixes are handled directly. however this led me to have 7 routers all similar. is possible to usa a

Re: [exim] secondary MX: allow only a set of users

2007-12-22 Thread John Robinson
On 22/12/2007 09:46, Leonardo Boselli wrote: i would linke to know if i could write local_part_prefix = /etc/exim4/allowed_prefixes.doma_in I don't see why not; you can certainly have local_part_prefix = ab- : cd- : ef- In fact you might even have domains = example.com example.net

Re: [exim] secondary MX: allow only a set of users

2007-12-21 Thread Leonardo Boselli
Il 20 Dec 2007 alle 3:17 Phil Pennock immise in rete Make the very first Router something like (untested): It works fine ... it is important is the first router. i also added _before_ this one the routers that use a local_part_prefix This way such prefixes are handled directly. however this

Re: [exim] secondary MX: allow only a set of users

2007-12-21 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2007-12-22 at 02:46 +0100, Leonardo Boselli wrote: i also added _before_ this one the routers that use a local_part_prefix This way such prefixes are handled directly. however this led me to have 7 routers all similar. is possible to usa a file not only for local parts but also for

Re: [exim] secondary MX: allow only a set of users

2007-12-20 Thread Leonardo Boselli
Il 19 Dec 2007 alle 22:11 Daniel Collis-Puro immise in rete Leonardo Boselli wrote: I want: avoid that the secondary mx accept email that in turn is sent to the primary and then bounced. So i would like to set a list of possible address that are accepted. such list however is not just a

Re: [exim] secondary MX: allow only a set of users

2007-12-20 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2007-12-19 at 22:46 +0100, Leonardo Boselli wrote: I have two servers and two more secondary MX. I want: avoid that the secondary mx accept email that in turn is sent to the primary and then bounced. So i would like to set a list of possible address that are accepted. such list however is

Re: [exim] secondary MX: allow only a set of users

2007-12-20 Thread Leonardo Boselli
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Phil Pennock wrote: There are no Directors since Exim3, so I think that you mean Routers. ok ... but i remember they were called in the first exim4 documentation director-routers Make the very first Router something like (untested): relay_domains_filter: driver =

Re: [exim] secondary MX: allow only a set of users

2007-12-20 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 09:50:01AM +0100, Leonardo Boselli wrote: Il 19 Dec 2007 alle 22:11 Daniel Collis-Puro immise in rete Leonardo Boselli wrote: I want: avoid that the secondary mx accept email that in turn is sent to the primary and then bounced. So i would like to set a list of

Re: [exim] secondary MX: allow only a set of users

2007-12-20 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:46:01PM +0100, Leonardo Boselli wrote: I have two servers and two more secondary MX. I want: avoid that the secondary mx accept email that in turn is sent to the primary and then bounced. So i would like to set a list of possible address that are accepted. such

Re: [exim] secondary MX: allow only a set of users

2007-12-20 Thread Leonardo Boselli
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 09:50:01AM +0100, Leonardo Boselli wrote: Il 19 Dec 2007 alle 22:11 Daniel Collis-Puro immise in rete Why not use a recipient verification callout for the destination mail server? Something like: NOT feasible: Sure it

Re: [exim] secondary MX: allow only a set of users

2007-12-20 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2007-12-20 at 14:23 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Look for 'smtp_reserve_hosts'. With this, you can allow the backup MX to connect to the master even when the master is already 4xx'ing other hosts because of things like smtp_load_reserve. Look up Single Point Of Failure. The point of

[exim] secondary MX: allow only a set of users

2007-12-19 Thread Leonardo Boselli
I have two servers and two more secondary MX. I want: avoid that the secondary mx accept email that in turn is sent to the primary and then bounced. So i would like to set a list of possible address that are accepted. such list however is not just a plain list of addresses, but it could be also

Re: [exim] secondary MX: allow only a set of users

2007-12-19 Thread Daniel Collis-Puro
Leonardo Boselli wrote: I have two servers and two more secondary MX. I want: avoid that the secondary mx accept email that in turn is sent to the primary and then bounced. So i would like to set a list of possible address that are accepted. such list however is not just a plain list of