Jakob Hirsch a écrit :
Quoting Olivier Bonvalet:
I haven't got enough entropy on my servers, and /dev/random is
blocking.
Now, I'll search to a true solution :
Do you really need TLS for sending out your newsletter?
If not: hosts_avoid_tls is expanded, so you could use it for
Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
Other possible ways are:
- a hardware RNG, either in the chipset (supported by the kernel) or
from a cheap microphone (kernel patch available)
- Entropy Gathering Daemon (EGD) or similar user space tools, must be
supported by your software (patched openssl?)
No, in my
So I try to :
- put /var/spool/exim4 on a different partition, with noatime option
- put /var/spool/exim4/db in memory (/dev/shm)
- set message_logs = false
- set split_spool_directory = true
It didn't change anything, exim send about 280 / 300 emails per minute.
But, I think I found where is
Quoting Olivier Bonvalet:
I haven't got enough entropy on my servers, and /dev/random is
blocking.
Now, I'll search to a true solution :
Do you really need TLS for sending out your newsletter?
If not: hosts_avoid_tls is expanded, so you could use it for disabling
TLS when sending out the
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Phil Pennock wrote:
Local DNS cache
/var/log being a different filesystem from /var/spool/exim/ (not just
for the hints).
Set split_spool_directory.
no_message_logs
Tony.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
Tony Finch a écrit :
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Phil Pennock wrote:
Local DNS cache
/var/log being a different filesystem from /var/spool/exim/ (not just
for the hints).
Set split_spool_directory.
no_message_logs
Yes I read it too, and add it in the config file.
But I can't test before
Tony Finch a écrit :
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
I was thinking it was needed only for ext2/ext3. For XFS and JFS too ? And
what about ReiserFS ?
It also changes the way Exim scans the spool in a queue run, which can
help performance even on filesystems that handle
Hello,
sorry for this frequent question, but I don't really found what I'm
searching.
So, we actually have 6 small servers (sempron 2.2Ghz, 512Mo RAM, 1 IDE HD)
to send a newsletter once a week to about 400'000 members.
We setup Exim 4.5 (Debian Sarge) on each of them, but can't send more
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 05:22:57PM +0100, Olivier Bonvalet said:
Hello,
sorry for this frequent question, but I don't really found what I'm
searching.
So, we actually have 6 small servers (sempron 2.2Ghz, 512Mo RAM, 1 IDE HD)
to send a newsletter once a week to about 400'000 members.
We
Stephen Gran a écrit :
You'll need to profile to figure out where yourbottleneck is,
unfortunately. It occurs to me that if 6 servers send 5 emails/second,
and the email is 5k, that's 150k/s, which is roughly the speed of a T1.
If I have guessed right, and you have a T1, then there's not much
According to Olivier Bonvalet,
Stephen Gran a ?crit :
You'll need to profile to figure out where yourbottleneck is,
unfortunately. It occurs to me that if 6 servers send 5 emails/second,
and the email is 5k, that's 150k/s, which is roughly the speed of a T1.
If I have guessed right, and you
On 21/03/06, Olivier Bonvalet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Gran a écrit :
You'll need to profile to figure out where yourbottleneck is,
unfortunately. It occurs to me that if 6 servers send 5 emails/second,
and the email is 5k, that's 150k/s, which is roughly the speed of a T1.
If I
On 2006-03-21 at 17:22 +0100, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
Have I to set anything else to improve perf ?
Local DNS cache, or LDAP slave if using LDAP for lookups.
If doing many file lookups per recipient, consider building the data
into CDB files for faster lookups.
/var/log being a different
Phil Pennock a écrit :
On 2006-03-21 at 17:22 +0100, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
Have I to set anything else to improve perf ?
Local DNS cache, or LDAP slave if using LDAP for lookups.
Ok. I already have a local DNS cache, and don't use LDAP.
If doing many file lookups per
14 matches
Mail list logo
