Steen Eugen Poulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mo 10 Sep 2007 07:11:45 CEST):
I have a mail server thats the front door and a semi hidden real mail
server for it to hand off the mail to.
I do not see any problem. If you've a router to your hidden server, exim
can use it for recipient verify via
On 2007-09-10 at 07:11 +0200, Steen Eugen Poulsen wrote:
I have a mail server thats the front door and a semi hidden real mail
server for it to hand off the mail to.
So I want it to do
accept domains = +gateway_for_domains
endpass
message = unroutable address
verify = recipient
off
On 10/09/2007, Steen Eugen Poulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a mail server thats the front door and a semi hidden real mail
server for it to hand off the mail to.
So I want it to do
accept domains = +gateway_for_domains
endpass
message = unroutable address
verify = recipient
off
Phil Pennock skrev:
(1) You route the +gateway_for_domains separately in the Routers
section, before the send-to-MX router. Look at the manualroute
driver. Something like (untested):
That works fine, I've no problem with this. as I said, it's accept rules
thats the problem, because
On 10/09/2007, Steen Eugen Poulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Pennock skrev:
(1) You route the +gateway_for_domains separately in the Routers
section, before the send-to-MX router. Look at the manualroute
driver. Something like (untested):
That works fine, I've no problem
On-list please...
On 10/09/2007, Steen Eugen Poulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Bowyer skrev:
You're trying too hard. The verify functionality uses the same routers
as the delivery - as long as you don't restrict individual routers
with verfy= and its friends.
If delivery is
On 10/09/2007, Steen Eugen Poulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I give up.
Fair enough - more help is available when you come back.
--
Peter Bowyer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please
On 10/09/2007, Steen Eugen Poulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Bowyer skrev:
Fair enough - more help is available when you come back.
Yeah right, no matter how much I tell you my setup doesn't work, you
keep telling me it does. What am I supposed to do with that advice?
Give more detail.
Peter Bowyer wrote:
And the rest didn't even comprehend the question.
Your evidence for this is what? It's unspoken etiquette on this list
that once someone has engaged with a problem, it's generally left to
that person to continue with it.
I'm only seeing your half of this conversation,
On 10/09/2007, Marc Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Bowyer wrote:
And the rest didn't even comprehend the question.
Your evidence for this is what? It's unspoken etiquette on this list
that once someone has engaged with a problem, it's generally left to
that person to continue
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 14:13 -0400, Marc Sherman wrote:
I'm only seeing your half of this conversation, Peter. I think the OP is
unsubscribed, and must be CC'ing his replies to you. So you're getting
his mail immediately, and the rest of us are left in the dark until a
list moderator manually
Graeme Fowler skrev:
They're not in the moderation queue - I just approved two from this
morning which are likely duplicates.
Something else is afoot here, to be sure - probably the OP is replying
to Peter off list.
The problem is at my end, I had forgotten that reply goes to the
poster and
I have a mail server thats the front door and a semi hidden real mail
server for it to hand off the mail to.
So I want it to do
accept domains = +gateway_for_domains
endpass
message = unroutable address
verify = recipient
off course since localhost is main MX, that breaks and all the ways I
13 matches
Mail list logo
