030916 Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Tuesday September 16 2003 09:16 am, Philip Webb wrote:
i still don't know what the FSB is auto'ly being set to,
but the mobo is recognising the CPU correctly as a 2500+
setting the CPU frequency at 1833 MHz .
tom # cat /proc/cpuinfo
model name : AMD
a 3rd night of testing (generally) success!
i still don't know what the FSB is auto'ly being set to,
but the mobo is recognising the CPU correctly as a 2500+
setting the CPU frequency at 1833 MHz .
i've installed Mdk 9.2rc2 w/o any major problem,
tho' a number of minor irrit'ns, which i've
On Tuesday September 16 2003 09:16 am, Philip Webb wrote:
a 3rd night of testing (generally) success!
i still don't know what the FSB is auto'ly being set to,
but the mobo is recognising the CPU correctly as a 2500+
setting the CPU frequency at 1833 MHz .
What does this say?
tom # cat
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:28:30 -0500
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does this say?
tom # cat /proc/cpuinfo
Just curious, what's the full output from the above for your system?
Charles
--
The game of love is never called off on account of darkness
--
On Tuesday September 16 2003 01:50 pm, Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:28:30 -0500
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does this say?
tom # cat /proc/cpuinfo
Just curious, what's the full output from the above for your
system?
Charles
tom # cat
re my attempt to get my new box working -- Soyo Dragon Plus KT400 Black,
AMD XP Barton 2500+, DDR400 (512 MB), ASUS AGP V9180 Magic (MX440 8x) -- ,
a 2nd night's testing made progress, tho' there's still more to do.
no problem with the CD drive,
which i was able to mount from the RAMF118 diskette
On Sunday 14 September 2003 11:57 pm, Rolf Pedersen wrote:
Greg Meyer wrote:
IDE0 (VIA Primary) hde, hdf == My burner attached here
IDE1 (VIA Secondary) hdg, hdh == My cdrom
IDE2 (Highpoint Primary) hda, hdb == My boot drive
IDE3 (Highpoint Secndary) hdc, hdd == My spare drive
030727 Greg Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 27 July 2003 04:13 pm, you wrote:
030725 Greg Meyer wrote:
Seems you may have tripped over a bug
that affects true 333fsb processors very specific video chipsets.
i've sent the mobo to Soyo via the retailer,
so all awaits its return after 1 - 2 wk .
Let
On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 05:10, Philip Webb wrote:
030727 Greg Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 27 July 2003 04:13 pm, you wrote:
030725 Greg Meyer wrote:
Seems you may have tripped over a bug
that affects true 333fsb processors very specific video chipsets.
i've sent the mobo to Soyo via the
On Sunday 14 September 2003 05:10 am, you wrote:
030727 Greg Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 27 July 2003 04:13 pm, you wrote:
030725 Greg Meyer wrote:
Seems you may have tripped over a bug
that affects true 333fsb processors very specific video chipsets.
i've sent the mobo to Soyo via the
On Sunday 14 September 2003 05:10 am, Philip Webb wrote:
[ cc to Mdk Expert, in case anyone else has helpful advice ]
the retailer -- to whom i returned the Soyo Dragon Ultra KT400 mobo --
told me that Soyo had recalled them were replacing them with new ones.
last week, i picked up a mobo,
030914 ed tharp wrote:
i have now reassembled the box tried it out.
it seems to be an improvement at the BIOS level:
it recognises the processor as 'AMD XP 2500+' (correctly)
defaults the DRAM clock to 166 MHz (previously it set it to 133 MHz ).
however, there's a new problem: Linux
030914 Greg Meyer wrote:
What does your lilo.conf look like?
Remember that board has to boot with 'noapic acpi=off'.
assuming nothing has happened to the HD files,
lilo.conf still has the 'noapic acpi=off' item.
nothing should have changed on the HDD,
which has remained in the box during the
030914 Bryan Phinney wrote:
Not really sure which board you have.
I have a Soyo Dragon KT400 Ultra Platinum.
Soyo Dragon Ultra Black KT400 ( 1 below the Platinum IIRC).
I have always had problems with the Hpt372 RAID controller on the board
I get a kernel panic everytime I boot when the
Philip Webb wrote:
030914 Greg Meyer wrote:
What does your lilo.conf look like?
Remember that board has to boot with 'noapic acpi=off'.
assuming nothing has happened to the HD files,
lilo.conf still has the 'noapic acpi=off' item.
nothing should have changed on the HDD,
which has remained
On Sunday 14 September 2003 11:41 am, Philip Webb wrote:
030914 Bryan Phinney wrote:
Not really sure which board you have.
I have a Soyo Dragon KT400 Ultra Platinum.
Soyo Dragon Ultra Black KT400 ( 1 below the Platinum IIRC).
I have always had problems with the Hpt372 RAID controller on
On Sunday 14 September 2003 11:58 am, Rolf Pedersen wrote:
Seeming to recall that you have the hpt372 controller on this board, my
experience is that you can only use this for ide hard drives, not cdroms
or other ide devices. Mine is on an IWill xp333-r. I have experienced
Yes, this is
030914 Greg Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 14 September 2003 11:58 am, Rolf Pedersen wrote:
Seeming to recall that you have the hpt372 controller on this board,
my experience is that you can only use this for ide hard drives,
not cdroms or other ide devices. Mine is on an IWill xp333-r.
Yes, this
Philip Webb wrote:
030914 Greg Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 14 September 2003 11:58 am, Rolf Pedersen wrote:
Seeming to recall that you have the hpt372 controller on this board,
my experience is that you can only use this for ide hard drives,
not cdroms or other ide devices. Mine is on an
On Sunday 14 September 2003 09:02 pm, Philip Webb wrote:
however, i'm not sure re the correspondence of names:
there are IDE1 IDE2 IDE3 IDE4, then HDD0 HDD1 HDD2 HDD3
in Linux 'hda hdb hdc hdd hde hdf hdg hdh'.;
Linux seems to see HDD0 (the hard drive) as 'hde'.
can anyone offer clarific'n ?
Greg Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 14 September 2003 09:02 pm, Philip Webb wrote:
however, i'm not sure re the correspondence of names:
there are IDE1 IDE2 IDE3 IDE4, then HDD0 HDD1 HDD2 HDD3
in Linux 'hda hdb hdc hdd hde hdf hdg hdh'.;
Linux seems to see HDD0 (the hard drive) as 'hde'.
can anyone
21 matches
Mail list logo
