On Tuesday 04 March 2003 12:34 am, David E. Fox wrote:
Well, first start your app. Note the process id (PID) by top or ps or
other method.
Start up gdb in a terminal window, and then do 'attach PID' where PID
is the process id you wrote down in step #1.
Now if the process crashes you will
David E. Fox wrote:
Having several xmms-insances running at the same time (stress the
soundcard a bit), and perform a kernel-compile:
make -j 100 bzImage
That's pretty extreme... you might void the warranty :).
I just tried that, but reduced it to a -j 20 and closed mozilla out
because I
Whoops ducking (and laughing) that went over my head. Can you tell me how=
to=20
do whatever it is you mentioned?
Well, first start your app. Note the process id (PID) by top or ps or
other method.
Start up gdb in a terminal window, and then do 'attach PID' where PID
is the process id you
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 01:17:46 -0500, Ronald J. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else having problems with this game under v9.0? I can play it just -so-
long then, always...it segfaults out. Whats puzzling is that this game,
running under 9.0 on my 2 sons computers runs for hours
On Sunday 02 March 2003 01:17 am, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
Anyone else having problems with this game under v9.0? I can play it just
-so- long then, always...it segfaults out. Whats puzzling is that this
game, running under 9.0 on my 2 sons computers runs for hours flawlessly.
We all use Nvidia
On Sunday 02 March 2003 01:58 am, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
I don't know what's causing the segfault, but I can assure you that it is
not the XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD message. That message pops up if you're not
using a Xi Graphics (XiG) X server. In other words, it happens to all
XFree86 users.
On Sunday 02 March 2003 08:46 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
If you are the one with the different drivers, try and isolate that by
dropping back to theirs. If it is not the drivers, it sounds like it could
also be a heat issue ie, program segfaults when things get a little warm.
What's the cooling
Have you tried running it in gdb ? then doing what ever you do to make
it SIGSEGV
I've found div-by-zero and other bugs this way.
Cheers
JG
on the 02/03/03 15:23, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Sunday 02 March 2003 08:46 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
If you are the one with the different drivers, try and
Hi Ronald,
I had a similar experience once with a Computer, Via-Chipset.
Averred that the Mainboard had a problem. The issue actually was a
combination of Network/Sound/Memory High PCI Usage. Means - that I
always had a segfault when these 4 things where producing together a
high-load. In the
Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Sunday 02 March 2003 08:46 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
If you are the one with the different drivers, try and isolate that by
dropping back to theirs. If it is not the drivers, it sounds like it could
also be a heat issue ie, program segfaults when things get a little warm.
Having several xmms-insances running at the same time (stress the
soundcard a bit), and perform a kernel-compile:
make -j 100 bzImage
That's pretty extreme... you might void the warranty :).
I just tried that, but reduced it to a -j 20 and closed mozilla out
because I have 256 megs of RAM -
On Sunday 02 March 2003 12:09 pm, J. Grant wrote:
Have you tried running it in gdb ? then doing what ever you do to make
it SIGSEGV
I've found div-by-zero and other bugs this way.
Cheers
JG
Whoops ducking (and laughing) that went over my head. Can you tell me how to
do whatever it is you
On Sunday 02 March 2003 04:06 pm, Joerg Mertin wrote:
Hi Ronald,
I had a similar experience once with a Computer, Via-Chipset.
Averred that the Mainboard had a problem. The issue actually was a
combination of Network/Sound/Memory High PCI Usage. Means - that I
always had a segfault when
On Sunday 02 March 2003 07:15 pm, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
What is your video cards temp? an over heating video card will segfault
/ crash / lockup. I had this exact problem, getting a fan for the video
card fixed the problem.
It has a built in fan - how do I find out the cards temp?
It could
Anyone else having problems with this game under v9.0? I can play it just -so-
long then, always...it segfaults out. Whats puzzling is that this game,
running under 9.0 on my 2 sons computers runs for hours flawlessly. We all
use Nvidia Geforce cards. One is running the 4191 drivers, 2 are
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:58 pm, Lorne wrote:
Ahhh crap, that complicates things. I thought I had read where they were
all the same. I guess just some components are the same. I'm fairly certain
it is hardware based, but perhaps with some tweaking of cmos or ?? you can
get it more
On Thursday 13 February 2003 12:53 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:58 pm, Lorne wrote:
Ahhh crap, that complicates things. I thought I had read where they were
all the same. I guess just some components are the same. I'm fairly
certain it is hardware based, but
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:48 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:04 pm, Lorne wrote:
I'd start by swapping out the ram from one of the others and seeing of
the problem follows. If not, try video card and then... well you get the
idea.
:)
Ram is different on
-Posted this to newbie first-
Anyone else having problems with this game under v9.0? I can play it just -so-
long then, always...it segfaults out. Whats puzzling is that this game,
running under 9.0 on my 2 sons computers runs for hours flawlessly. We all
use Nvidia Geforce cards. One is
haven't played it, but...
three machines with same OS, same video card, same video driver, one of
them keeps crashing? Sounds to me like the one machine is a) the one
with the different video driver, or b) overheating.
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 08:29, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
-Posted this to newbie
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:29 am, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
-Posted this to newbie first-
Anyone else having problems with this game under v9.0? I can play
it just -so- long then, always...it segfaults out. Whats puzzling
is that this game, running under 9.0 on my 2 sons computers runs
for
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 01:31 pm, Jack Coates wrote:
haven't played it, but...
three machines with same OS, same video card, same video driver, one of
them keeps crashing? Sounds to me like the one machine is a) the one
with the different video driver, or b) overheating.
Hi Jack. Thanks
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 01:36 pm, s wrote:
[darklord@darkforce darklord]$ ut2003
Xlib: extension XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD missing on display
:0.0.
I get that too, I don't think it's fatal.
Right. According to the readme in one of the patches, its expecting Xi
Graphics stuff - which of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ronald J. Hall wrote on Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 02:57:47PM -0500 :
Also, one said that it was a glibc problem, and a symbolic link was needed
between /lib/i686/libpthread-0.9.so and /lib/libpthread.so.X? There is a file
by the name of
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 12:47 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 01:31 pm, Jack Coates wrote:
haven't played it, but...
three machines with same OS, same video card, same video driver, one of
them keeps crashing? Sounds to me like the one machine is a) the one
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:04 pm, Lorne wrote:
I'd start by swapping out the ram from one of the others and seeing of the
problem follows. If not, try video card and then... well you get the idea.
:)
Ram is different on all 3 machines
comp1 - 512 megs DDR ram (2100)
comp2 - 384 megs DDR
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 03:42 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
Wild shot in the dark here.
cd /lib
mv i686 i686.nouse
ldconfig
Then see if it still does it (probably requires a runlevel change, maybe
even a reboot). This will make it use the i586 optimized glibc instead
of the i686 optimized
Congratulations!
My son is very happy with ut2003, I am sure you will too.
Francisco Alcaraz
Murcia (Spain)
- Mensaje Original -
Remitente: Michael Holt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fecha: Viernes, Enero 17, 2003 4:46 am
Asunto: Re: [expert] ut2003
OH MY GOSH I finally got it! I can't
On Thursday 16 January 2003 10:47 pm, Michael Holt wrote:
Full - but I have it running now - FINALLY!
Now for nvidia to patch their last 4191 drivers and I'll be a happy
camper!
Thanks, Mike
You having trouble with those too? I'm using the 4191 set, and with the demo
of UT2003 I get a
On Thursday 16 January 2003 12:54 am, Michael Holt wrote:
Hey all,
Has anyone installed ut2003? I'm stumped - I've just spent the last two
days trying to install but after about 6 or 7 hours, it goes into this
loop where it keeps creating the same folder within it self ( it creates a
folder
I have the whole ut2003 runing fine in my Mandrake 9.0 with Geforce4 Pentium
III. I had to dissable the buggy supermount, open two konsole, put the third
cd-rom in the second cd-drive and I used the other console to mount the next
cds in the first cd-driver.
If you need more help I could
-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] ut2003
I have the whole ut2003 runing fine in my Mandrake 9.0 with Geforce4 Pentium
III. I had to dissable the buggy supermount, open two konsole, put the third
cd-rom in the second cd-drive and I used the other console to mount
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] ut2003
On Thursday 16 January 2003 12:54 am, Michael Holt wrote:
Hey all,
Has anyone installed ut2003? I'm stumped - I've just spent the last two
days trying to install but after about 6 or 7 hours, it goes into this
loop where it keeps creating
Hey all,
Has anyone installed ut2003? I'm stumped - I've just spent the last two
days trying to install but after about 6 or 7 hours, it goes into this
loop where it keeps creating the same folder within it self ( it creates a
folder called scorched earth and populates it with some files then
Hi Miark,
here we go.
The XF86Config-4 file has the Following Section-Module Entry:
Section Module
# This loads the DBE extension module.
Loaddbe
# This loads the miscellaneous extensions module, and disables
# initialisation of the XFree86-DGA extension within that module.
Load
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 22 November 2002 4:05 pm, Miark wrote:
:-) Yes, I got the splash screen. I know when the nVidia drivers
aren't working becuase TuxRacer is simply unplayable. But it's
a-rockin' right now.
By the way, here's my relevant system info:
Hi Miark
I got a Athlon 1.3GHz, 512MBytes of Ram and a NVidia Geforce3 Ti500 -
and details set to low - I can even go onto huge servers and have not too
big problems with speed (24Players). So - It's fast enough for me ;)
If you want - I could send you my X-Config file for you to compare. I
And on the subject of fast machines - I have a dual athlon 1900+ system -
does UT2003 have the ability to use smp? I'm really annoyed that q3a only
enables smp for windows machines - they note some 'bug' that made them
decide to disable it in the linux version - I wish they would have just
Miark, you say it slows down in heated game play - is that single player
or network? Could it be network related? Just a thought.
Mike
Yesterday, Miark mused:
:-) Yes, I got the splash screen. I know when the nVidia drivers
aren't working becuase TuxRacer is simply unplayable. But it's
No, it's single player.
Miark
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 06:32:30 -0800 (PST)
Michael Holt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miark, you say it slows down in heated game play - is that single player
or network? Could it be network related? Just a thought.
Mike
Yesterday, Miark mused:
:-) Yes, I
Yes, that would be cool. Thanks.
Miark
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 10:31:26 +0100 (CET)
Joerg Mertin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Miark
I got a Athlon 1.3GHz, 512MBytes of Ram and a NVidia Geforce3 Ti500 -
and details set to low - I can even go onto huge servers and have not too
big problems
On Thursday 21 November 2002 10:44 am, you wrote:
You need to be running a very fast machine with the proprietary nVIDIA
drivers (as well as an nVIDIA video card) and lots of memory and disk
space.
BTW, it works great as long as you have a very fast machine.
Just out of curiosity, what r u
you installed the NVidia drivers? If
not, you're using MESA which is not HW accelerated.
David
-Original Message-
From: Miark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] UT2003 and linux
Any performance
are you absolutely sure? When you start X, do you get an nVidia splash
screen?
David
-Original Message-
From: Miark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] UT2003 and linux
Ya, I'm using the proprietary nVidia
On November 22, 2002 10:14 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Thursday 21 November 2002 10:44 am, you wrote:
You need to be running a very fast machine with the proprietary nVIDIA
drivers (as well as an nVIDIA video card) and lots of memory and disk
space.
BTW, it works great as long as you
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] UT2003 and linux
Any performance tips, Alan? I'm running it at 800x600, and with
all the detail turned off, or to the lowest setting possible,
and the game play still sucks
, November 22, 2002 11:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] UT2003 and linux
Ya, I'm using the proprietary nVidia drivers. By the way,
someone said it works fine if you have a fast system. Is
that fast as in 1GHz+ or 2GHz? I have a 1.1GHz.
Miark
Want to buy your Pack or Services
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 3:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] UT2003 and linux
:-) Yes, I got the splash screen. I know when the nVidia drivers
aren't working becuase TuxRacer is simply unplayable. But it's
a-rockin' right now.
By the way, here's my
In my case, I changed a few weeks ago my old Voodoo3 3000 for a Creative 3D
Blaster Titanium. First of all I installed the 2 rpms of Nvidia; then I run
XFdrake and the video-card started to run inmediately; just I had to add some
lines in the XF86-Config4 file to have the tv-output runing.
I have runing fine Ut2003 demo, but when I like to buy the programe just a
windows release is avalaible :-(
Is there any linux release or do I need the windows installation and a
linux-server package?
thanks for the help in advance
--
Francisco Alcaraz Ariza
Murcia
España (Spain)
Want to
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] UT2003 and linux
I have runing fine Ut2003 demo, but when I like to buy the programe just a
windows release is avalaible :-(
Is there any linux release or do I need the windows installation and a
linux-server package?
thanks for the help in advance
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote:
I have runing fine Ut2003 demo, but when I like to buy the programe just a
windows release is avalaible :-(
Is there any linux release or do I need the windows installation and a
linux-server package?
thanks for the help in advance
David, thanks so much for your help
El Vie 22 Nov 2002 00:08, JOHAM,DAVID (HP-Boise,ex1) escribió:
I thought the Linux release was in the same box as the Windows release, but
I can't seem to find any documentation to prove that.
In any case, if you're going to buy this, I recommend
Thanks a lot for the clues Alan.
El Jue 21 Nov 2002 16:44, alan escribió:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote:
I have runing fine Ut2003 demo, but when I like to buy the programe just
a windows release is avalaible :-(
Is there any linux release or do I need the windows
Alan,
My machine is a Pentium III 800 256Mb RAm and with a Geforce 4 Ti with 64 Mb;
the demo is runing in it like a charm.
See you
--
Francisco Alcaraz Ariza
Departamento de Biología Vegetal
Universidad de Murcia
E-30100 Murcia
España (Spain)
Want to buy your Pack or Services from
Message-
From: Francisco Alcaraz Ariza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] UT2003 and linux
I have runing fine Ut2003 demo, but when I like to buy the programe just a
windows release is avalaible :-(
Is there any
The third CD of UT2003 has a Linux installer. I couldn't
tell you how _well_ it works, but it's there.
Miark
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002 23:59:17 +0100
Francisco Alcaraz Ariza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have runing fine Ut2003 demo, but when I like to buy the programe just a
windows release is
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002 07:44:46 -0800 (PST)
alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are a couple of things to need to know to install it.
Have two xterms open. Mount the cdrom from one and do the install on the
other. Use the full path to the setup binary. You will need to mount and
unmount a
Any performance tips, Alan? I'm running it at 800x600, and with
all the detail turned off, or to the lowest setting possible,
and the game play still sucks. In WinblowsXP, I run with almost
everything turned on or at Normal and at 1280x768 and the game
play is smth. I have a GeForce 4 MX
59 matches
Mail list logo
