Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2001-02-28 Thread John Wolford
Yes, rpmfind.net and google i use constantly. Well, i don't always use rpmfind so much but i know about it. I like tuxfinder.com because it finds .gz and so many other extensions. thanks again :-) j --- Pedro Del Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue Feb 27 2001 13:01, You wrote: OH MY GOD.

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2001-02-27 Thread Pedro Del Medico
On Tue Feb 27 2001 01:51, You wrote: Thank you Pedro! I found the iso but apparently www.tuxfind.com doesn't exist! A whois and nslookup claim that tuxfind.com is not a registered host/domain! I'll try again later. Ups I'm very sorry. The url is www.tuxfinder.com -- Best Regards,

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2001-02-27 Thread John Wolford
OH MY GOD. I have been needing something like tuxfinder.com for a while now! It's funny how these things can exist and we do/don't find out about it. Thank you very much, j --- Pedro Del Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue Feb 27 2001 01:51, You wrote: Thank you Pedro! I found the

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2001-02-27 Thread Pedro Del Medico
On Tue Feb 27 2001 13:01, You wrote: OH MY GOD. I have been needing something like tuxfinder.com for a while now! It's funny how these things can exist and we do/don't find out about it. I should mention www.rpmfind.net too and www.google.com it is a good place to start from -- Cheers,

RE: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2001-02-26 Thread Daryl Johnson
Of Alan Shoemaker Sent: 26 February 2001 08:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know were I can downloade Mandrake 7.1 for i386? Joergen Traun Joergenthere are no versions of Linux Mandrake for the i386

RE: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2001-02-26 Thread Milnes Terry SSgt 52LSS/LGLOE
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 My take on this is that the kernel in the distribution includes compiled in support for i-386, however should Joergen want to just have an i-386 kernel he can recompile then from the sources? regards Daryl -Original Message- From

RE: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2001-02-26 Thread Daryl Johnson
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Milnes Terry SSgt 52LSS/LGLOE Sent: 26 February 2001 10:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 Actually Mandrakesoft compiles almost everything using the i686 flag. This way everything is optimized for 686 processors. Correct

RE: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2001-02-26 Thread John Wolford
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 Actually Mandrakesoft compiles almost everything using the i686 flag. This way everything is optimized for 686 processors. Correct me if I am wrong though. NeoFax -Original Message- From: Daryl Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2001-02-26 Thread Pedro Del Medico
El Lun 26 Feb 2001 16:46, escribiste: What ever happened to 7.1?? One day i was browsing through 7.1 RPMS on a mirror site and the next day they were all gone and i couldn't find any mention of 7.1 ANYWHERE. It's like it never existed. (I know it did exist Hey my friend, before you go crazy

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2001-02-26 Thread John Wolford
Thank you Pedro! I found the iso but apparently www.tuxfind.com doesn't exist! A whois and nslookup claim that tuxfind.com is not a registered host/domain! I'll try again later. Anyway, thanks :-) j --- Pedro Del Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El Lun 26 Feb 2001 16:46, escribiste: What

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 Menu Update

2000-12-02 Thread Ronnie Whipp
Tom Berkley wrote: I tried to use the menu update command in the 7.1 mandrake (kde 1.2) desktop and got the message menu edit not installed. After looking for a while nothing stood out. If anyone can enlighten me about which rpm contains the kde menu editor (note this is 7.1 not 7.2), I

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 and SCSI install probs

2000-08-01 Thread Robert Fox
Thanks. Nice to hear I'm not alone in the world! At 11:43 PM 7/31/2000 +0200, you wrote: On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 21:49 +0200, Robert Fox wrote: I have the following: Adaptec 2940 UW Mine is a DawiControl with SymbiosLogic chip SCSI ID 3 is a Plextor PX-32TS 32X CD-ROM Mine is a

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 and SCSI install probs

2000-08-01 Thread maiplace
- Original Message - From: "Wolfgang Bornath" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000 5:43 PM Subject: Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 and SCSI install probs On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 21:49 +0200, Robert Fox wrote: I have the following: Adaptec 2940

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 and SCSI install probs

2000-07-31 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 21:49 +0200, Robert Fox wrote: I have the following: Adaptec 2940 UW Mine is a DawiControl with SymbiosLogic chip SCSI ID 3 is a Plextor PX-32TS 32X CD-ROM Mine is a Plextor UltraPlex40max As CDRW I have a Plextor PlexWriter 4/2/2 When I boot the Mandrake 7.1 CD

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 and SCSI install probs

2000-07-31 Thread kf
On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Robert Fox wrote: = I have installed 7.1 several times on several machines without much = hassle. But my main system which worked perfectly with 7.0 won't allow me = to install with 7.1 = = I have the following: Adaptec 2940 UW = = SCSI ID 3 is a Plextor PX-32TS 32X

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 Networking Woes.

2000-07-16 Thread Ron Stodden
Chris Abiad wrote: In my house, we've got a cable modem (from @Home) coming into a Win98 machine (I know...) running Sygate that's doing the network address translation (IP Masquerading/routing/proxying/whatever) for us. This machine has two NICs. One goes out to @Home, the other comes in

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 hangs up with screen saver program

2000-07-05 Thread John Aldrich
On Wed, 05 Jul 2000, you wrote: Hi, folks After running smoothly about five days, my linux box finally hangs up with screen saver program. I remember it happens several times before. Software Environment: Mandrake7.1 with Helix GNOME lastest version, Xscreensaver Any ideas to fix

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 and BP6 hard drive optimizations

2000-07-01 Thread Manuël Beunder
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, you wrote: Vic wrote: I just type hdparm -c3d1 /dev/hda for the first ide drive On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, you wrote: Hi all, I hope this doesn't cover too well trod ground but I couldn't find any good answer to it in the archives. I recently

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 and BP6 hard drive optimizations

2000-06-23 Thread Paul Gratz
Hey all, I just wanted to follow up and tell how I got it to work. Its kind of cheating but I downloaded the Gentus distribution and stole the kernel that comes with it and put it in my mandrake 7.1. I'm now getting about 6 times the performance out of my UDMA66 drive. The kernel doesn't have

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 and BP6 hard drive optimizations

2000-06-23 Thread John N
Could you tell us, step by step, how you did this? Thank You Paul Gratz wrote: Hey all, I just wanted to follow up and tell how I got it to work. Its kind of cheating but I downloaded the Gentus distribution and stole the kernel that comes with it and put it in my mandrake 7.1. I'm now

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 and BP6 hard drive optimizations

2000-06-23 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, you wrote: Hey all, I just wanted to follow up and tell how I got it to work. Its kind of cheating but I downloaded the Gentus distribution and stole the kernel that comes with it and put it in my mandrake 7.1. I'm now getting about 6 times the performance out of my

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 and BP6 hard drive optimizations

2000-06-21 Thread Paul Gratz
[snip] recompile for 386 code, kernel and driver. The Seagate IDE drive is marginal at the timing and signal gating requirements of 586 code and often locks up. So do MOST WDs, though some of them will work without the Xxx parm and often run close to the UDMA66 speed required. Read

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 and BP6 hard drive optimizations

2000-06-20 Thread Vic
I just type hdparm -c3d1 /dev/hda for the first ide drive On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, you wrote: Hi all, I hope this doesn't cover too well trod ground but I couldn't find any good answer to it in the archives. I recently decided to switch to Mandrake from Red hat when 7.1 came out. One of

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 and BP6 hard drive optimizations

2000-06-20 Thread Don
Hi Paul, I am running NT4.0 and Linux 7.0-2 smp mode on the ide3 port. Nt is on hde drive, and linux is on the second drive at hdf. I do not have any hard drives on the ide1 ide2 or ide4 ports. My CD-ROMS are on ide1 port, and this setup works very well. I have a very stable system, and am

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 and BP6 hard drive optimizations

2000-06-20 Thread Civileme
Vic wrote: I just type hdparm -c3d1 /dev/hda for the first ide drive On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, you wrote: Hi all, I hope this doesn't cover too well trod ground but I couldn't find any good answer to it in the archives. I recently decided to switch to Mandrake from Red hat when

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 and BP6 hard drive optimizations

2000-06-20 Thread Steve Browne
Hi all, I hope this doesn't cover too well trod ground but I couldn't find any good answer to it in the archives. I recently decided to switch to Mandrake from Red hat when 7.1 came out. One of the statements I saw sent around about it was that it natively supported the HPT366 UDMA66

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 and BP6 hard drive optimizations

2000-06-20 Thread Paul Gratz
Hmmm well actually hda is not on the hpt366 its drive hde In anyevent I tried that on hde and after a few seconds this is what happens: [root@gratz1 /root]# hde: timeout waiting for DMA ide_dmaproc: chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func only: 12 hde: irq timeout: status=0x58 { DriveReady

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2000-06-15 Thread Grzegorz Staniak
TK Kim wrote: Neither. I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser. Everybody is answering, so why not me too. :) I think you need to define "better". IE is in many ways superior as far as HTML rendering is

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2000-06-14 Thread Joerg Mertin
- On 12 Jun, TK Kim wrote: - Neither. - I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for - saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser. Actually, the Netscape-package as shipped with helium is quite nice. Just make sure the required compat-libs are

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2000-06-14 Thread Ernest N. Wilcox Jr.
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 - TK Kim, you wrote: | Neither. | I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for | saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser. I simply use KDE's file manager to read web pages. kfm does not do all the tricks the big guys do, but it

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2000-06-13 Thread Charles Curley
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 02:57:28PM -0800, Civileme wrote: - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - - On 12 Jun, TK Kim wrote: - Neither. - I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for - saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser. - - - Well I have seen people with

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 on Toshiba Portege Laptop - PCMCIA issues

2000-06-13 Thread Wang Jian
It is an old problem. You should set BIOS setting of PCMCIA to "cardbus" or "PCMCIA", but not "auto". Sunday, June 11, 2000, 1:26:18 AM, you wrote: d Hi, d I have installed Mandrake 7.1 (via FTP) to my laptop, however, bootup d hangs when it reaches the Loading PCMCIA Modules part. If I

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2000-06-12 Thread TK Kim
Neither. I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser. From: "Eugene C. Zesch" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 09:46:11 -0500

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2000-06-12 Thread laurent . duperval
On 12 Jun, TK Kim wrote: Neither. I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser. I find it's a genralized feeling, although I've never used it. I prefer Mozilla but it still crashes too much. L -- Laurent

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2000-06-12 Thread Charles Curley
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 11:25:29AM -0400, TK Kim wrote: - Neither. - I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for - saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser. Cool. Let us know when it is available for Linux. -- -- C^2 No windows were

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2000-06-12 Thread Eugene Grimsdell
I know - I run win4lin which is $49.00 just so that I can run IE5 on my Linux My problems is Plug-ins ie: Macromedia Shockwave Flash. On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, TK Kim wrote: Neither. I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2000-06-12 Thread LinuxMan :-)
hi ! nope...no kde 2 on 7.1 , but we are getting there :-) "Eugene C. Zesch" wrote: Hello listmembers, Can anyone tell me if 7.1 installs KDE2 and Kongueror? I'm so tired of Netscape I could spit! Thanks, Gene -- -- Best Regard's , Amir Tal, System

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2000-06-12 Thread Fran Parker
You won't get killed here...I agree! But hopefully Konquerer will be that replacement :) Bambi TK Kim wrote: Neither. I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser. From: "Eugene C. Zesch" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2000-06-12 Thread Civileme
"Eugene C. Zesch" wrote: Hello listmembers, Can anyone tell me if 7.1 installs KDE2 and Kongueror? I'm so tired of Netscape I could spit! Thanks, Gene Nope... Go here ftp://ftp.linux.tucows.com/pub/distribution/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/contrib/RPMS and then you

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2000-06-12 Thread Civileme
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12 Jun, TK Kim wrote: Neither. I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser. Well I have seen people with IE 5.5 trying to uninstall to get back to 5, but the 5 I saw working

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2000-06-12 Thread Eugene C. Zesch
TK Kim wrote: Neither. I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser. You wont get an argument from me. I haven't used IE5 yet, I bailed from windows for linux around IE4 and IE4 is still on the kids computer. No

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1

2000-06-12 Thread Fran Parker
Hi, Civileme I beg to differ with you. IE 5 with only security upgrades and toys from MS and all the plugins you could want worked great on my machineincluding a MS Agent toy to read me web pages, not the Bonzi Buddy (annoying), just a simple MS Agent script that would open your default

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 Plus -- LinuxLAND

2000-06-09 Thread Benjamin Sher
Dear Alan and friends: My deep apologies for getting myself and everybody else confused. Yes, it's LinuxLand, NOT LinuxMart or LinuxMall. Glad I threw in the URL with the right address. Benjamin Alan Shoemaker wrote: Benjaminyes, exactly! LinuxLand is where I ordered my 7.1 2 CD set

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 Plus -- LinuxLAND

2000-06-09 Thread Alan Shoemaker
BenjaminI really don't think that 'deep apologies' are necessary. :-) And maybe I was the only one that was confused, duh! Alan Benjamin Sher wrote: Dear Alan and friends: My deep apologies for getting myself and everybody else confused. Yes, it's LinuxLand, NOT LinuxMart or

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 Plus -- LinuxLAND

2000-06-09 Thread Jean-Louis Debert
Benjamin Sher wrote: Dear Alan and friends: My deep apologies for getting myself and everybody else confused. Yes, it's LinuxLand, NOT LinuxMart or LinuxMall. Glad I threw in the URL with the right address. Benjamin Alan Shoemaker wrote: Benjaminyes, exactly! LinuxLand is

Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 Plus -- where to get it

2000-06-08 Thread Alan Shoemaker
Benjaminyes, exactly! LinuxLand is where I ordered my 7.1 2 CD set as well. But because you said your 7.1 CD set was coming from LinuxMart in your original posting (and now again in this posting, but this time you left a clue, the URL to LinuxLand) I was amazed. Why?! Because I hadn't