On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, John Aldrich wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, you wrote:
ROTFL.. Thanks but no thanks, John. That CD is my lifeline to sanity.
Heh. Yeah...you'd be surprised at the sparks a CD gives off
after about 5-10 seconds in a microwave oven. ;-) (Try it
with an AOL CD G)
Trivia:
The early Motorola 6800 MicroProcessor had undefined instructions that
you could feed to it -- instructions being binary numbers, after all. One
of those instructions would put the micro in an illegal state. It would
halt, and after 10 - 15 minutes, if left on in that state
Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, ibi wrote:
Axalon,
Please tell me Linux does not literally "burst into flames".
Pj
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course I over exagerated, you get lots of wierd things like sig 7/11 's
(pun intended :) and other nice usefull error
That's a relief! I was sure you were kidding, but it's nice to see it
reinforced in print. Thanks!!!
Pj
Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, ibi wrote:
Axalon,
Please tell me Linux does not literally "burst into flames".
Pj
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course I over
At 02:55 12/01/00 -0600, you wrote:
That's a relief! I was sure you were kidding, but it's nice to see it
reinforced in print. Thanks!!!
Ahem
"http://wso.williams.edu/~aramos/upsfire/"
:-)
nick@nexnix
Pj
Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, ibi wrote:
Axalon,
Please
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, you wrote:
Of course I over exagerated, you get lots of wierd things like sig 7/11 's
(pun intended :) and other nice usefull error messages, all though I'm
sure theres people here that could give us just cause as to how one could
burst into flames. ;-)
Put the CD in
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, you wrote:
ROTFL.. Thanks but no thanks, John. That CD is my lifeline to sanity.
Heh. Yeah...you'd be surprised at the sparks a CD gives off
after about 5-10 seconds in a microwave oven. ;-) (Try it
with an AOL CD G)
John
: Please tell me Linux does not literally "burst into flames".
:
: Pj
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
:Of course I over exagerated, you get lots of wierd things like sig 7/11 's
:(pun intended :) and other nice usefull error messages, all though I'm
:sure theres people here that could give us just cause
Id' rather use Windoze. I have a vivid imagination. :-)
Pj
John Aldrich wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, you wrote:
ROTFL.. Thanks but no thanks, John. That CD is my lifeline to sanity.
Heh. Yeah...you'd be surprised at the sparks a CD gives off
after about 5-10 seconds in a microwave
Linux denies my existence everytime I open it. I just consider it a love
note: "PJ, I'd love it if you would learn what you are doing."
Pj
Denis Havlik wrote:
: Please tell me Linux does not literally "burst into flames".
:
: Pj
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
:Of course I over exagerated, you
Then imagine this: Blue Scream of Death!
On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 03:57:56PM -0600, ibi wrote:
- Id' rather use Windoze. I have a vivid imagination. :-)
-
- Pj
-
- John Aldrich wrote:
-
- On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, you wrote:
- ROTFL.. Thanks but no thanks, John. That CD is my lifeline to
Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
Of course I over exagerated, you get lots of wierd things like sig 7/11 's
(pun intended :) and other nice usefull error messages, all though I'm
sure theres people here that could give us just cause as to how one could
burst into flames. ;-)
--
MandrakeSoft
Nick Kay wrote:
At 21:00 10/01/00 +1300, you wrote:
I've got an old 486 here that my friend wants to use as a
firewall/proxy, but I can't install either mandrake or redhat on it due
to the lack of ram (8mb) and it being a 486. On both, it stops at
loading 2nd stage ramdisk. It's quite
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, John Aldrich wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, you wrote:
If you hadn't noticed, Mandrake is optimized for i586 architecture. It's
not supposed to be run on 486's. However, put Redhat or one of the
mini-router distribs on it and I wouldn't be surprised if it would run
Axalon,
Please tell me Linux does not literally "burst into flames".
Pj
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, you wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, John Aldrich wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, you wrote:
If you hadn't noticed, Mandrake is optimized for i586 architecture. It's
not supposed to be run on 486's. However, put Redhat or one of the
mini-router distribs on it and I
Andrew Mitchell wrote:
John Aldrich wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, you wrote:
I doubt it that 8MB ram is a problem. as it happens, I booted a machine
with full M6.1 distribution on it, and only 8MB RAM! (Installing might be
another story though).
Anyway, there is no need for
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, ibi wrote:
Axalon,
Please tell me Linux does not literally "burst into flames".
Pj
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course I over exagerated, you get lots of wierd things like sig 7/11 's
(pun intended :) and other nice usefull error messages, all though I'm
sure theres people
I've got an old 486 here that my friend wants to use as a
firewall/proxy, but I can't install either mandrake or redhat on it due
to the lack of ram (8mb) and it being a 486. On both, it stops at
loading 2nd stage ramdisk. It's quite screwed, at least for windoze use,
since it'll only boot with
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Andrew Mitchell wrote:
I've got an old 486 here that my friend wants to use as a
firewall/proxy, but I can't install either mandrake or redhat on it due
to the lack of ram (8mb) and it being a 486. On both, it stops at
loading 2nd stage ramdisk. It's quite screwed, at
Andrew Mitchell wrote:
I've got an old 486 here that my friend wants to use as a
firewall/proxy, but I can't install either mandrake or redhat on it due
to the lack of ram (8mb) and it being a 486. On both, it stops at
loading 2nd stage ramdisk. It's quite screwed, at least for windoze use,
Have you tried mandrake 5.3? It wasn't optimized for pentiums and was still
set for the 386.
Lyndon Lininger Sr.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Mitchell" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2000 2:00 AM
Subject: [expert] Trying to ins
Andrew Mitchell writes:
I've got an old 486 here that my friend wants to use as a
firewall/proxy, but I can't install either mandrake or redhat on it due
to the lack of ram (8mb) and it being a 486. On both, it stops at
loading 2nd stage ramdisk. It's quite screwed, at least for windoze
At 21:00 10/01/00 +1300, you wrote:
I've got an old 486 here that my friend wants to use as a
firewall/proxy, but I can't install either mandrake or redhat on it due
to the lack of ram (8mb) and it being a 486. On both, it stops at
loading 2nd stage ramdisk. It's quite screwed, at least for
: I've got an old 486 here that my friend wants to use as a
: firewall/proxy, but I can't install either mandrake or redhat on it due
: to the lack of ram (8mb) and it being a 486. On both, it stops at
: loading 2nd stage ramdisk. It's quite screwed, at least for windoze use,
: since it'll
Try this
http://www.zelow.no/floppyfw/
It can be set to run in 8M and requires no more than a 386. Contained on a
single floppy it is a screening router using ipchains.
Civileme
"S. Newhouse" wrote:
Andrew Mitchell writes:
I've got an old 486 here that my friend wants to use as a
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, you wrote:
If you hadn't noticed, Mandrake is optimized for i586 architecture. It's
not supposed to be run on 486's. However, put Redhat or one of the
mini-router distribs on it and I wouldn't be surprised if it would run
like a champ.
Umm..Mandrake 5.3 was NOT
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, you wrote:
I doubt it that 8MB ram is a problem. as it happens, I booted a machine
with full M6.1 distribution on it, and only 8MB RAM! (Installing might be
another story though).
Anyway, there is no need for a full distro if you only want a
firewall/proxy. Take a
28 matches
Mail list logo
