From: Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
I rewrote the lmsensors init script so that it was manually loading the
modules rather than pulling them from the /etc/sysconfig/lmsensors file.
I
ran the script and it loaded the modules, then stopped the script and it
unloaded the modules. When I
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 12:36 pm, Bryan Phinney wrote:
I have recently started trying to install lm sensors on my computer which
has a Soyo KT400 Dragon Ultra Platinum motherboard. I have had very mixed
results with the sensors including some very hard to diagnose hard locks on
the
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 02:03 pm, Thomas Backlund wrote:
in order to solve wich one kills your system, you should use the modprobe
command
and try to load one module at a time until it hangs...
Originally, the problem module was the adm1021 module and that was due to the
options line
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:36:51 -0500, Bryan Phinney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about [expert] lm sensors:
Scenario, I installed lmsensors by RPM, ran sensors-detect and let it
create the /etc/sysconfig/lmsensors configuration file. When I restarted
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Bryan,
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:36:51 -0500, Bryan Phinney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about [expert] lm sensors:
Scenario, I installed lmsensors by RPM, ran sensors-detect and let it
create the /etc/sysconfig/lmsensors configuration file. When I
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 02:52 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
I only load the it87. The lm75 driver may be causing your problem, there
isn;t one on that board. Also, on the Soyo, I only got accurate readings
by specifying a socket type when modprobing the driver. the differnet
types are in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:42:00 +, Dick Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about Re: [expert] lm sensors:
Aargh, and I thought I cancelled this one just in time. Please waste. The
next version is the final. Sorry.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 05:42 pm, Dick Gevers wrote:
There`s easier ways to tackle that; IMHO. Proberbly failsafe is safe, but
why bother, if you`re careful and consider beforehand what you do, go to
init 1 and cd to where you want to make your changes. Of course, vi may be
the
On Sunday 17 June 2001 01:09 am, David E. Fox wrote:
that doesn't work for you, it's a hardware problem. Still, AMD
isn't going to fully support temperature monitoring till the Athlon
4's come out
Isn't that more of a mainboard issue than a CPU one?
Not practically. While decent
On Saturday 16 June 2001 03:18 pm, David E. Fox wrote:
I've rebuilt lm-sensors and installed it,
Any suggestions? I was hoping to upgrade to kernel 2.4.5, but in
looking into the kernel config file I don't see anything that exactly
matches the probe that my mainboard uses.
Mandrake
Mandrake 2.2.x kernels have had i2c support patched in even before
the 2.4.x kernels. You might need to undo your efforts and just
install the appropriate lm_utils ...-mdk rpm. With 8.0 I'm using
I saw some of the necessary modules in lib/modules/2.2.17/misc but the
one I need
I use this program to do that on the Abit BP6 system (health)
and when you untar the program you will find instructions on how to set it up
Don
On Friday 02 February 2001 17:41, you wrote:
"J . A . Magallon" wrote:
On 02.02 PBone wrote:
I am trying to get temperature monitoring for
On 02.02 PBone wrote:
I am trying to get temperature monitoring for my athlon/epox 8kta2/Mandrake
7.2 system.
I have been to the lm_sensors site but the latest Mandrake rpms are for
Mandrake 7.0.
Is there an easy (ie rpm) way to install lm_sensors- (I have had low success
rate trying
"J . A . Magallon" wrote:
On 02.02 PBone wrote:
I am trying to get temperature monitoring for my athlon/epox 8kta2/Mandrake
7.2 system.
I have been to the lm_sensors site but the latest Mandrake rpms are for
Mandrake 7.0.
Is there an easy (ie rpm) way to install lm_sensors- (I have
14 matches
Mail list logo
