Re: [Fab-user] Any interest in extension to support getting things from source control?

2009-10-09 Thread Steve Steiner (listsin)
On Oct 6, 2009, at 10:58 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote: While it's not that hard to just run the commands for source control systems from within a fabfile, is there any interest in having some actual support for pulling files from source control? I'm looking at using fabric for some deployment tasks

Re: [Fab-user] Any interest in extension to support getting things from source control?

2009-10-09 Thread Ask Solem
On Oct 7, 2009, at 4:58 AM, Jeremy Katz wrote: While it's not that hard to just run the commands for source control systems from within a fabfile, is there any interest in having some actual support for pulling files from source control? I'm looking at using fabric for some deployment tasks

Re: [Fab-user] Any interest in extension to support getting things from source control?

2009-10-09 Thread Jeff Forcier
Hi guys, tl;dr version: it *may* make sense to add contrib SCM support, but only if there's a demonstrated need for something greater than 'run(my_scm_tool (clone|checkout) repository_url)' :) Anyone with that sort of need, please pipe up with some use cases! Full replies below. On Oct 6,

Re: [Fab-user] Any interest in extension to support getting things from source control?

2009-10-09 Thread Jeremy Katz
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Jeff Forcier j...@bitprophet.org wrote: tl;dr version: it *may* make sense to add contrib SCM support, but only if there's a demonstrated need for something greater than 'run(my_scm_tool (clone|checkout) repository_url)' :) Anyone with that sort of need, please

Re: [Fab-user] Any interest in extension to support getting things from source control?

2009-10-09 Thread Simon Smith
Yes, I'd be interested in pulling things from source control, and here's the use case: Right now, I make a temporary directory, pull the files or directories out of subversion into that temporary directory, rsync them over to my target (using fabric's rsync support) and cleanup when I'm done.

Re: [Fab-user] Any interest in extension to support getting things from source control?

2009-10-09 Thread Jeff Forcier
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Simon Smith simongsm...@gmail.com wrote: Even if you don't put anything into fabric that is source-control-system specific, having some support for the underlying or surrounding little jobs (the temporary directory, Not sure if you've seen what some of the

Re: [Fab-user] Any interest in extension to support getting things from source control?

2009-10-09 Thread Jeremy Katz
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Jeff Forcier j...@bitprophet.org wrote: On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Jeremy Katz ka...@fedoraproject.org wrote: For one thing, if you want to be able to reliably handle errors, run() isn't going to be feature-ful enough unless you're wrapping some sort of

Re: [Fab-user] Any interest in extension to support getting things from source control?

2009-10-09 Thread Jeff Forcier
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Jeremy Katz ka...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Return status is always a little perilous to depend on in my experience... I haven't extensively looked at the changes in 0.9 there It's certainly not a panacea. So I guess you were talking about examining the