Re: [Factor-talk] DOS Encoding

2016-10-27 Thread Alexander Ilin
27.10.2016, 01:53, "John Benediktsson" :does it work to just use binary and then do ``>string``? Well, it sort of works, but the result in what I would expect, knowing that Factor works with Unicode, and Unicode does contain all the pseudographics. 

Re: [Factor-talk] DOS Encoding

2016-10-27 Thread Alexander Ilin
Hello! 27.10.2016, 11:32, "Alexander Ilin" :27.10.2016, 01:53, "John Benediktsson" :does it work to just use binary and then do ``>string``? Sorry, let me redo my last message. Well, it sort of works, but the result is not what I would expect, knowing that

Re: [Factor-talk] DOS Encoding

2016-10-27 Thread Alexander Ilin
27.10.2016, 03:14, "Jim Mack" :Are you talking about the characters that used to be used in character based windows apps?  LIke on this page from 179-218 or so? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_page_437 Yes, that's exactly what I'm talking about. ---=---Александр 

Re: [Factor-talk] DOS Encoding

2016-10-27 Thread Alexander Ilin
27.10.2016, 01:53, "John Benediktsson" :does it work to just use binary and then do ``>string``? Sorry, let me redo my last message. Well, it sort of works, but the result is not what I would expect, knowing that Factor works with Unicode, and Unicode does contain all the