package review questions

2009-06-05 Thread Jan Klepek
Hi, I'm working on unofficial package review for redmine ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 ). Redmine is written in ruby and is using rubygem-actionwebservice, which is shipped with redmine. Rubygem-actionwebservice was abandoned by upstream like two years ago, and same

Re: the end of life for flash player (HTML5)

2009-06-05 Thread Christof Damian
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 09:48, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: Mostly it depends on YouTube - it's 90% of all Flash content for me. So if YouTube (and p0rn variants :D) adopts video tag, battle is nearly won. For games - canvas with JS is nice way. But it's missing IDE as Adobe has -

Re: Question about web applications

2009-06-05 Thread Matej Cepl
David Nalley, Thu, 04 Jun 2009 07:00:25 -0400: Perhaps I am the least well suited to respond as I did some of the initial review. However, there are at least 10 bundled libraries with ampache, including pear-XML_RPC, nusoap, getid3, small snippets from Horde, captchaphp, php-Snoopy, etc.

Re: Maintainer Responsibilities

2009-06-05 Thread Matej Cepl
Reindl Harald, Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:45:21 +0200: I think it is simple BAD to close bugreports with upstream! For me as enduser of fedora i have one bugzilla and i really like to help with bugreports, try things if maintainer needs better explains what happens. As you can see from this thread,

Re: Maintainer Responsibilities

2009-06-05 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Jueves 04 Junio 2009 20:23:01 Adam Williamson escribió: On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 17:27 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: I'll happily raise upstream bugs myself but it irks me when maintainers close Fedora bugs with the UPSTREAM resolution without actually taking the upstream fix and bringing it

Re: Some pulseaudio questions...

2009-06-05 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 05.06.09 00:21, Jon Masters (jonat...@jonmasters.org) wrote: Folks, Anyone want to clarify my understanding of PA's use of mlock/posix_madvise? From looking over the code - in particular pa_will_need, and its callsites - it looks like PA doesn't really use this support that it has

Re: Interested in scanning?

2009-06-05 Thread Nicu Buculei
On 06/05/2009 01:23 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: I think a good start would be making a list of problems seen in setting up scanners (additional packages required, tweaks), and make sure that gnome-scan and the necessary plugins are installed in a default installation. My experience with

Re: Interested in scanning?

2009-06-05 Thread Frank Murphy (Frankly3d)
Bastien Nocera wrote: Heya, Yesterday, I was browsing Ubuntu's Blueprints for their next release, and saw this: https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-karmic-gnomescan gnome-scan is already packaged by Deji, but I gather that more integration work could be done to make

Re: Interested in scanning?

2009-06-05 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 06/05/2009 06:23 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: Heya, Yesterday, I was browsing Ubuntu's Blueprints for their next release, and saw this: https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-karmic-gnomescan gnome-scan is already packaged by Deji, but I gather that more integration

Re: Some pulseaudio questions...

2009-06-05 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 06/05/2009 06:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: Usually running pulseaudio -v in a terminal might give you a hint what might be going wrong. Lennart, Maybe this is a stupid question (you know I am constantly full of them), but is there any way for pulseaudio to detect this common

Re: Interested in scanning?

2009-06-05 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:56:47AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: On 06/05/2009 06:23 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: Heya, Yesterday, I was browsing Ubuntu's Blueprints for their next release, and saw this: https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-karmic-gnomescan

Re: Interested in scanning?

2009-06-05 Thread Nicu Buculei
On 06/05/2009 04:14 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 14:04 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: Now F11 is a new low: when pressing the scan or preview buttons from either xsane-gimp or gnomescan the result is X crashing and me seeing the GDM screen. X crashing does not sound like

Re: Interested in scanning?

2009-06-05 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 14:04 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: Now F11 is a new low: when pressing the scan or preview buttons from either xsane-gimp or gnomescan the result is X crashing and me seeing the GDM screen. X crashing does not sound like something related to scanning in particular; but

Re: Rawhide moving on to Fedora 12 content

2009-06-05 Thread Martín Marqués
2009/6/5 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com: I've made the switch tonight so that rawhide will be Fedora 12 content. This will cause a huge number of updates, if the compose actually finishes, and will finish quite late. For the next few days, attempts to use mirror manager for the Fedora 11

Re: Interested in scanning?

2009-06-05 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 04:32:12PM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: On 06/05/2009 04:14 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: X crashing does not sound like something related to scanning in particular; but it is certainly a bug worth filing, especially if it is easily reproducible. I was not sure on which

Re: Interested in scanning?

2009-06-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:56:47AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: On 06/05/2009 06:23 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: Heya, Yesterday, I was browsing Ubuntu's Blueprints for their next release, and saw this: https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-karmic-gnomescan

Re: Interested in scanning?

2009-06-05 Thread Nicu Buculei
On 06/05/2009 04:47 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 04:32:12PM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: On 06/05/2009 04:14 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: X crashing does not sound like something related to scanning in particular; but it is certainly a bug worth filing, especially if it is

Re: Interested in scanning?

2009-06-05 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Friday 05 June 2009 08:56:47 Tom spot Callaway wrote: On 06/05/2009 06:23 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: Heya, Yesterday, I was browsing Ubuntu's Blueprints for their next release, and saw this: https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-karmic-gnomescan gnome-scan

Re: Interested in scanning?

2009-06-05 Thread Nicu Buculei
On 06/05/2009 05:11 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 05:01:58PM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: On 06/05/2009 04:47 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: If a program crashes, there's a bug in that program. There may also be a bug in whatever's triggering the crash, but that's a separate

Re: GDM Language list...

2009-06-05 Thread Ray Strode
Hi, 2. to GDM maintainers: Is it possible to change the list of languages dynamically (based on the language-supports installed) on the GDM login screen? We only show a language in the language list if 1) It's got at least one translation in /usr/share/locale 2) it's recognized by libc as a

Re: GDM Language list...

2009-06-05 Thread Christoph Wickert
Am Freitag, den 05.06.2009, 20:30 +0530 schrieb Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel: Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Ven 5 juin 2009 15:06, Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel a écrit : applications like gedit, nautilus showing square boxes instead of Hindi text. Actually, in F11

Re: GDM Language list...

2009-06-05 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Ven 5 juin 2009 17:03, Ray Strode a écrit : Hi, 2. to GDM maintainers: Is it possible to change the list of languages dynamically (based on the language-supports installed) on the GDM login screen? We only show a language in the language list if 1) It's got at least one translation

Re: GDM Language list...

2009-06-05 Thread Bill Nottingham
Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel (an...@redhat.com) said: I think above checks only ensures the technical (rather i18n) support exists. But, what about the native language desktop users who expects fedora to be equal for all languages (just like english)? How about, We only show a

Re: Interested in scanning?

2009-06-05 Thread Jesse Keating
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 08:56 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: Perhaps we could target some specific scanners on the first attempt? We might be able to get some hardware donated to the effort. ~spot, who has several scanners of varying age and quality in a box I have a relatively new Canon

Re: Maintainer Responsibilities

2009-06-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 23:19 +0200, Edwin ten Brink wrote: Aside from all discussions in this thread, the current Bugzilla documentation seems quite clear on this topic. Whatever the outcome of the discussion is, I think the documentation which is visible to the end-user (customer), should

Re: Rawhide moving on to Fedora 12 content

2009-06-05 Thread Jesse Keating
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 10:36 -0300, Martín Marqués wrote: Couldn't this have waited until F11 was out? Previous releases we've waited longer, but given that F12 is a short release cycle, and that we delayed F11 release twice it was important that we get rawhide moving on for the sake of F12.

Re: GDM Language list...

2009-06-05 Thread Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote: How about that: 1. user chooses a language in GDM for the first time 2. PK tries to install the language-support group 3. if this group exist and some packages could be installed (i.e. not already installed), the user is presented a nice PK popup, just like the

Re: Maintainer Responsibilities

2009-06-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 10:44 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: In other situations, you can set the UPSTREAM keyword, so the bug remains open but you know it's being handled upstream and you need to bring the fix downstream once it's available upstream. I like idea of some TRACKING_UPSTREAM

Re: Action requested: check dist tags and conditionals

2009-06-05 Thread Bill Nottingham
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said: Does this look like the right generic structure for doing this: %if 0%{?fedora} = X || 0%{?rhel} = Y # Do things from X until Current Fedora, Y until Current RHEL # Y should be the latest released version if we don't know that # it's not

Re: Interested in scanning?

2009-06-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 11:23 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: Heya, Yesterday, I was browsing Ubuntu's Blueprints for their next release, and saw this: https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-karmic-gnomescan gnome-scan is already packaged by Deji, but I gather that more

Re: Some pulseaudio questions...

2009-06-05 Thread Jon Masters
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 11:11 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 12:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fri, 05.06.09 00:21, Jon Masters (jonat...@jonmasters.org) wrote: Text book RT applications use mlock()/mlockall() to lock themselves into memory and make sure they never

Re: Interested in scanning?

2009-06-05 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 09:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: So I think the gnome-scan interface is nice but if my results are reproduced by others, we can't really replace xsane with it until it's a bit less buggy. It would be nice if any coders with scanning interest could contribute to the

Re: Interested in scanning?

2009-06-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:50:40PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 09:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: So I think the gnome-scan interface is nice but if my results are reproduced by others, we can't really replace xsane with it until it's a bit less buggy. It would be

Re: Interested in scanning?

2009-06-05 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 17:56 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:50:40PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 09:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: So I think the gnome-scan interface is nice but if my results are reproduced by others, we can't

Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros

2009-06-05 Thread Adam Williamson
Just wanted to run this by the group to make sure it's desired before I start working on it... I've been dipping my toes into packaging things for Fedora lately, and one thing that feels a bit awkward is that the packaging guidelines are full of boilerplate like: Use this when a desktop entry

Re: orphaning nopaste // ruby help wanted for broken package

2009-06-05 Thread Casey Dahlin
Simon Wesp wrote: Dear List, short version: I'm going to orphan nopaste since rafb.net/paste, which was used by this package, is discontinued (bug #504108). I tried to contact upstream four times and asked if they were planning to switch to another provider, but no avail If someone

Re: orphaning nopaste // ruby help wanted for broken package

2009-06-05 Thread Iain Arnell
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Casey Dahlincdah...@redhat.com wrote: Simon Wesp wrote: Dear List, short version: I'm going to orphan nopaste since rafb.net/paste, which was used by this package, is discontinued (bug #504108). I tried to contact upstream four times and asked if they were

Re: Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros

2009-06-05 Thread Ray Strode
Hi, On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote: I've been dipping my toes into packaging things for Fedora lately, and one thing that feels a bit awkward is that the packaging guidelines are full of boilerplate like: [...] Heck, there's an entire page full of

Re: orphaning nopaste // ruby help wanted for broken package

2009-06-05 Thread Casey Dahlin
Iain Arnell wrote: On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Casey Dahlincdah...@redhat.com wrote: Simon Wesp wrote: Dear List, short version: I'm going to orphan nopaste since rafb.net/paste, which was used by this package, is discontinued (bug #504108). I tried to contact upstream four times and

FESco meeting summary for 20090605

2009-06-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
We are trying out a meeting irc bot plugin to handle meetings in a more consisent and timely manner. You can find a copy of the meeting output at: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/fedora-meeting/2009/fedora-meeting.2009-06-05-17.00.html We would appreciate feedback on this format for

Re: Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros

2009-06-05 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet
Ray Strode wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote: I've been dipping my toes into packaging things for Fedora lately, and one thing that feels a bit awkward is that the packaging guidelines are full of boilerplate like: [...] Heck, there's an

Re: Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros

2009-06-05 Thread Casey Dahlin
Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: I don't know how hard it would be to fix rpm to allow for that though. Just off the top of my head, this doesn't feel like something rpm should be in charge of. To me it seems more likely that we need something in a base/core rpm that installs an inotify script

Re: Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros

2009-06-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 13:50 -0400, Ray Strode wrote: It seems to me it'd make sense to convert all these kinds of snippets into macros. Am I right, or is there a reason against doing this? It would be awesome to get rid of the boilerplate. Honestly though, I'd rather the solution was just

Re: Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros

2009-06-05 Thread Seth Vidal
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: [...] It seems to me it'd make sense to convert all these kinds of snippets into macros. Am I right, or is there a reason against doing this? It would be awesome to get rid of the boilerplate. Honestly though, I'd rather the solution was

Re: FESco meeting summary for 20090605

2009-06-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Here also is the full txt file of the meeting: 17:00:15 nirik #startmeeting 17:00:28 nirik #meetingtopic FESCo Meeting - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 17:00:38 jds2001 nirik: you drive this meeting, I'm not sure how to operate this new-fangled thing :D 17:00:57 nirik happy to. I was

Re: GDM Language list...

2009-06-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel wrote: There is yet another dependency of internet connection here... An Internet connection (and a reasonably fast one at that) is basically required to use Fedora effectively. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com

Re: FESco meeting summary for 20090605

2009-06-05 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On 06/05/2009 10:51 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: We are trying out a meeting irc bot plugin to handle meetings in a more consisent and timely manner. You can find a copy of the meeting output at: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/fedora-meeting/2009/fedora-meeting.2009-06-05-17.00.html We

Re: Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros

2009-06-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: %{!?tcl_version: %global tcl_version %(echo 'puts $tcl_version' | tclsh)} %{!?tcl_sitelib: %global tcl_sitelib %{_datadir}/tcl%{tcl_version}} %{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print

Re: Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros

2009-06-05 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 10:31 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: It seems to me it'd make sense to convert all these kinds of snippets into macros. Am I right, or is there a reason against doing this? When this was discussed for the example of GConf schemas in the packaging committee a few weeks

Re: Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros

2009-06-05 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On 06/05/2009 10:31 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: It seems to me it'd make sense to convert all these kinds of snippets into macros. Am I right, or is there a reason against doing this? If I'm right, I'm happy to work on this and contribute it as patches to the relevant packages, or as a new

Re: FESco meeting summary for 20090605

2009-06-05 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:51:42AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: If this format is acceptable, I would like to see all irc meetings use it, and have them all transfer to a common location with search ability. If not, we will come up with something better. We should probably try to have these

Re: Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros

2009-06-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 14:40 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 10:31 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: It seems to me it'd make sense to convert all these kinds of snippets into macros. Am I right, or is there a reason against doing this? When this was discussed for

Re: Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros

2009-06-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 11:43 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: To some extent, yes. macros can go overboard, though. I think that the macros you're planning are going to make sense, though :-) Thanks. The way to get these changed is to first go through the Packaging Committee to get the

Re: (Most) Results from the Candidate Questionnaire are available now

2009-06-05 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
Sorry, was a bit busy over the past few days and didn't get around to answer all mails. On 04.06.2009 00:30, Andreas Thienemann wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote: [...] I'm disappointed this ended up being a more difficult process than you intended, but I have no doubt we can

Re: FESco meeting summary for 20090605

2009-06-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:56:34 -0400 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:51:42AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: If this format is acceptable, I would like to see all irc meetings use it, and have them all transfer to a common location with search ability. If not,

Re: Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros

2009-06-05 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On 06/05/2009 11:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 11:43 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: The way to get these changed is to first go through the Packaging Committee to get the changes approved, then have the macros merged into the packages that will provide them. Then patch

Re: Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros

2009-06-05 Thread Joe Nall
On Jun 5, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 14:40 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 10:31 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: It seems to me it'd make sense to convert all these kinds of snippets into macros. Am I right, or is there a reason

Re: Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros

2009-06-05 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Joe Nallj...@nall.com wrote: On Jun 5, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 14:40 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 10:31 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: It seems to me it'd make sense to convert all these kinds of

Re: (Most) Results from the Candidate Questionnaire are available now

2009-06-05 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 09:04:08PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: Sorry, was a bit busy over the past few days and didn't get around to answer all mails. On 04.06.2009 00:30, Andreas Thienemann wrote: On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote: [...] I'm disappointed this ended up being

Re: FESco meeting summary for 20090605

2009-06-05 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:05:06PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:56:34 -0400 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:51:42AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: If this format is acceptable, I would like to see all irc meetings use it, and have

Re: (Most) Results from the Candidate Questionnaire are available now

2009-06-05 Thread Till Maas
On Thu June 4 2009, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 03.06.2009 21:28, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedora/answers-table.ods Both updated with the answers from Dglimore. He has been added twice to the ods table. Regards, Till signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros

2009-06-05 Thread Till Maas
On Fri June 5 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: For things that are replacing actions, there is a certain amount of obscuring being done. This is a barrier for entry for people who know how to build software from upstream but don't know how to package. It also can make debugging harder if

Re: Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros

2009-06-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 12:28 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: /me notes that we did pass it in the end, though. I don't believe this would be a problem for things like python_sitelib which are defining standard directory locations. using macros for directories is something that we do

Re: FESco meeting summary for 20090605

2009-06-05 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:56:59PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:30:36 -0400 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote: So, perhaps someone could contribute that. :) Currently it just writes logs/summary to a local filesystem. I'd like to try this (and fail badly,

File Triggers (was Re: Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros)

2009-06-05 Thread Ray Strode
Hi, On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 13:50 -0400, Ray Strode wrote: It seems to me it'd make sense to convert all these kinds of snippets into macros. Am I right, or is there a reason against doing this? It would be awesome to

Re: Proposal (and yes, I'm willing to do stuff!): Must Use More Macros

2009-06-05 Thread Casey Dahlin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: Casey Dahlin wrote: Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: I don't know how hard it would be to fix rpm to allow for that though. Just off the top of my head, this doesn't feel like something rpm should be in charge of. To me it

Re: Mono ( Moonlight) Licensing? Revisited

2009-06-05 Thread King InuYasha
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote: King InuYasha wrote: I really don't see why you should freak out over Moonlight, if Mono is protected, then Moonlight 2 should be protected, since it is a form of Mono itself. Moonlight needs to go to RPM Fusion

Re: orphaning nopaste // ruby help wanted for broken package

2009-06-05 Thread Iain Arnell
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Casey Dahlincdah...@redhat.com wrote: Iain Arnell wrote: If anyone beats me too it - iwannit! You can have it. Your solution sounds better. Taken - for the sole purpose of retiring it gracefully. I've added a nopaste sub-package to perl-App-Nopaste in devel,

[Bug 504256] New: Please build latest perl-Math-BigInt-GMP for EPEL 4 and 5

2009-06-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please build latest perl-Math-BigInt-GMP for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504256 Summary: Please build latest perl-Math-BigInt-GMP

[Bug 504256] Please build latest perl-Math-BigInt-GMP for EPEL 4 and 5

2009-06-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504256 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added

rpms/perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple/EL-5 perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple.spec, 1.2, 1.3

2009-06-05 Thread Xavier Bachelot
Author: xavierb Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple/EL-5 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5916 Modified Files: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple.spec Log Message: merge my spec with ixs' Index: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple.spec

[Bug 504256] Please build latest perl-Math-BigInt-GMP for EPEL 4 and 5

2009-06-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504256 --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2009-06-05 05:43:16 EDT --- Even it requires Math::BigInt =

rpms/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 perl-POE-Component-Log4perl.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2009-06-05 Thread Yanko Kaneti
Author: yaneti Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12885/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log perl-POE-Component-Log4perl.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE

rpms/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl/F-11 import.log, NONE, 1.1 perl-POE-Component-Log4perl.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2009-06-05 Thread Yanko Kaneti
Author: yaneti Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13683/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log perl-POE-Component-Log4perl.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE

rpms/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl/F-10 import.log, NONE, 1.1 perl-POE-Component-Log4perl.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2009-06-05 Thread Yanko Kaneti
Author: yaneti Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14322/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log perl-POE-Component-Log4perl.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE

rpms/perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP/F-10 import.log, NONE, 1.1 perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2009-06-05 Thread Yanko Kaneti
Author: yaneti Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16500/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW

rpms/perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP/F-11 import.log, NONE, 1.1 perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2009-06-05 Thread Yanko Kaneti
Author: yaneti Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15990/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW

rpms/perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2009-06-05 Thread Yanko Kaneti
Author: yaneti Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15505/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP.spec Log Message: Initial import ---

rpms/perl-PDF-API2/devel .cvsignore, 1.9, 1.10 perl-PDF-API2.spec, 1.20, 1.21 sources, 1.9, 1.10

2009-06-05 Thread Bernard Johnson
Author: bjohnson Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-PDF-API2/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15933 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-PDF-API2.spec sources Log Message: v 0.73 Index: .cvsignore === RCS

[Bug 504389] New: RFE: update to 0.11

2009-06-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: RFE: update to 0.11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504389 Summary: RFE: update to 0.11 Product: Fedora Version: 10

rpms/perl-App-Nopaste/devel perl-App-Nopaste.spec,1.2,1.3

2009-06-05 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-App-Nopaste/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22488 Modified Files: perl-App-Nopaste.spec Log Message: * Sat Jun 06 2009 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.10-3 - nopaste gets its own subpackage (to replace existing

rpms/perl-App-Nopaste/F-11 perl-App-Nopaste.spec,1.2,1.3

2009-06-05 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-App-Nopaste/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25148/F-11 Modified Files: perl-App-Nopaste.spec Log Message: * Sat Jun 06 2009 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.10-3 - nopaste gets its own subpackage (to replace existing

rpms/perl-App-Nopaste/F-10 perl-App-Nopaste.spec,1.2,1.3

2009-06-05 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-App-Nopaste/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25148/F-10 Modified Files: perl-App-Nopaste.spec Log Message: * Sat Jun 06 2009 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.10-3 - nopaste gets its own subpackage (to replace existing