Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Problems Setting up 1.0.3

2006-11-03 Thread Chris St. Pierre
Rich-- As I mentioned on IRC, I got about 90% of the way through the SSL setup before my deadline hit and I had to go live without SSL fully working. My machines are all listening on port 636, but don't do SSL properly. As far as I can tell/remember, I provisioned the boxes identically, so they

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Problems Setting up 1.0.3

2006-11-03 Thread Chris St. Pierre
After the update from 1.0.2 to 1.0.3, I had some replication problems, and it appears that one of my four servers was no longer properly replicating to the others. I recreated the replication agreements and reinitialized the replications, but now I'm getting some strange errors in the error logs

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Problems Setting up 1.0.3

2006-11-03 Thread Richard Megginson
Chris St. Pierre wrote: After the update from 1.0.2 to 1.0.3, I had some replication problems, and it appears that one of my four servers was no longer properly replicating to the others. I recreated the replication agreements and reinitialized the replications, but now I'm getting some strange

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Need a replica on sles10

2006-11-03 Thread David Boreham
Any thoughts on what logs from FDS would be slurp-able, or if FDS supports writing that kind of replication log? Originally the two came from the same code. Netscape Directory Server 1.x used a replication mechanism that was derived from slurpd (but the slurp functionality was included in

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Problem accessing Configuration Directory after upgrade to 1.0.3

2006-11-03 Thread Dan
I notice 2 differences. The BIND is using version 2 when trying to start the admin server. That shouldn't matter. The problem seems to be with the BIND'ing. When trying to start the admin server, the RESULT to the BIND contains an empty dn. When run manually, the dn is correct. It

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Problem accessing Configuration Directory after upgrade to 1.0.3

2006-11-03 Thread Richard Megginson
Dan wrote: I notice 2 differences. The BIND is using version 2 when trying to start the admin server. That shouldn't matter. The problem seems to be with the BIND'ing. When trying to start the admin server, the RESULT to the BIND contains an empty dn. When run manually, the dn is correct.

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Problems Setting up 1.0.3

2006-11-03 Thread Chris St. Pierre
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Richard Megginson wrote: The consumer. The supplier thinks the consumer suffix is disabled. It might be as simple a fix as restarting the consumer. That changed the error message. [03/Nov/2006:11:21:24 -0600] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt=cn=Replication to