Rich--
As I mentioned on IRC, I got about 90% of the way through the SSL
setup before my deadline hit and I had to go live without SSL fully
working. My machines are all listening on port 636, but don't do SSL
properly. As far as I can tell/remember, I provisioned the boxes
identically, so they
After the update from 1.0.2 to 1.0.3, I had some replication problems,
and it appears that one of my four servers was no longer properly
replicating to the others. I recreated the replication agreements and
reinitialized the replications, but now I'm getting some strange
errors in the error logs
Chris St. Pierre wrote:
After the update from 1.0.2 to 1.0.3, I had some replication problems,
and it appears that one of my four servers was no longer properly
replicating to the others. I recreated the replication agreements and
reinitialized the replications, but now I'm getting some strange
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Richard Megginson wrote:
The consumer. The supplier thinks the consumer suffix is disabled. It might
be as simple a fix as restarting the consumer.
That changed the error message.
[03/Nov/2006:11:21:24 -0600] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
agmt=cn=Replication to
Richard Megginson wrote:
Sergey Ivanov wrote:
For me it was a problem with ownership of directories in
/opt/fedora-ds/slapd-name/ tree. logs, locks and config ownership was
changed by upgrade process to root. So the ns-slpad process was unable
to start. Also the file
Sergey Ivanov wrote:
Richard Megginson wrote:
Sergey Ivanov wrote:
For me it was a problem with ownership of directories in
/opt/fedora-ds/slapd-name/ tree. logs, locks and config ownership was
changed by upgrade process to root. So the ns-slpad process was unable
to start. Also the
Richard Megginson wrote:
Sergey Ivanov wrote:
[skip]
Hi Richard,
I have upgraded yesterday the last of my ldap servers. The most
difficult problem there is described in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213626
And this problem with ownership and permission denied was
I'm attempting to install 1.0.3 on an x86_64 machine running CentOS 4.4.
Once the rpm is installed, I run the setup script, answer the questions
and then the setup script does nothing (currently it's sitting at a
screen that says Fedora Project Directory Installation/Uninstallation
and nothing
Stephen C. Rigler wrote:
I'm attempting to install 1.0.3 on an x86_64 machine running CentOS 4.4.
Once the rpm is installed, I run the setup script, answer the questions
and then the setup script does nothing (currently it's sitting at a
screen that says Fedora Project Directory
Stephen C. Rigler wrote:
I'm attempting to install 1.0.3 on an x86_64 machine running CentOS 4.4.
Once the rpm is installed, I run the setup script, answer the questions
and then the setup script does nothing (currently it's sitting at a
Some problems here as well:
[slapd-netauth]: starting
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 12:01 -0700, Richard Megginson wrote:
try strace -p 5004
Maybe it's waiting for input? Also do tail /tmp/logMS4919 to see if it
has printed a prompt that looks like it is waiting for input.
It looks like it is waiting for input. When I hit enter it brings me
back
Stephen C. Rigler wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 12:01 -0700, Richard Megginson wrote:
try strace -p 5004
Maybe it's waiting for input? Also do tail /tmp/logMS4919 to see if it
has printed a prompt that looks like it is waiting for input.
It looks like it is waiting for input.
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 13:02 -0700, Richard Megginson wrote:
It looks like it is waiting for input. When I hit enter it brings me
back to the prompt asking if I want to install sample entries. However,
it seems to be stuck in a loop because any answer brings me back to the
same prompt.
For me it was a problem with ownership of directories in
/opt/fedora-ds/slapd-name/ tree. logs, locks and config ownership was
changed by upgrade process to root. So the ns-slpad process was unable
to start. Also the file
/opt/fedora-ds/slapd-name/config/dse.ldif.startOK was there in the
way,
14 matches
Mail list logo
