Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458592
--- Comment #14 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 22:45:33 EDT
---
Trying to fix with patched fontforge.
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459451
--- Comment #4 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 01:13:21 EDT
---
Hi Kevin,
I have just tested this patch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458592
--- Comment #15 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 01:22:42 EDT
---
Created an attachment (id=314902)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458592
--- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 01:35:27 EDT
---
Here is the fontforge upstream thread for
Author: smallvil
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1590/F-9
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log un-core-fonts.spec
Log Message:
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
On Sat August 23 2008, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
2008/8/23 Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Have DSA keys now been banned?
Yes.
Why?
The primary reason is that it's nearly impossible to tell if the key
was generated on a Debian system with the compromised OpenSSL
This is also true for RSA
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:37:13PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
The primary reason is that it's nearly impossible to tell if the key
was generated on a Debian system with the compromised OpenSSL
versions.
OK, I checked and it is far from impossible. After all the bug was
that there are only
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 10:21 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
This whole team got a well-deserved attaboy from Tim Burke, who is the
Director of Linux Development inside Red Hat.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-August/msg01023.html
'''
Dear Fedorans,
There's an old
2008/8/24 Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:37:13PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
2008/8/23 Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:06:07PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
2008/8/23 Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I saw that some people are using CVS
2008/8/24 Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:37:13PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
The primary reason is that it's nearly impossible to tell if the key
was generated on a Debian system with the compromised OpenSSL
versions.
OK, I checked and it is far from impossible.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:34:36AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
* ssh_key: Error - Not a valid RSA SSH key: ssh-dss ...
Have DSA keys now been banned?
Yes.
Why?
The primary reason is that it's nearly impossible to tell if the key
was generated on a Debian system
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:39:15AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
2008/8/24 Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:37:13PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
The primary reason is that it's nearly impossible to tell if the key
was generated on a Debian system with the
2008/8/24 Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:34:36AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
* ssh_key: Error - Not a valid RSA SSH key: ssh-dss ...
Have DSA keys now been banned?
Yes.
Why?
The primary reason is that it's nearly impossible to tell if the
Hi,
I'm keeping only a partial checkout of the packages, e.g. the ones I'm
maintaining. Now I'd like to be able to cvs up and have all updates
flow in, but if I do so cvs will want to get all other thousand
packages in.
Until now I'm using a poor man's solution with a for loop and
pushd/popd,
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 07:44:39PM +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
I'm keeping only a partial checkout of the packages, e.g. the ones I'm
maintaining. Now I'd like to be able to cvs up and have all updates
flow in, but if I do so cvs will want to get all other thousand
packages in.
Until now
2008/8/24 Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'm keeping only a partial checkout of the packages, e.g. the ones I'm
maintaining. Now I'd like to be able to cvs up and have all updates
flow in, but if I do so cvs will want to get all other thousand
packages in.
Until now I'm using a poor
On Sunday 24 August 2008 04:16:33 pm Chris Weyl wrote:
2008/8/24 Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'm keeping only a partial checkout of the packages, e.g. the ones I'm
maintaining. Now I'd like to be able to cvs up and have all updates
flow in, but if I do so cvs will want to get all
2008/8/24 Dennis Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That shouldnt work with the Makefiles. since they all use
cvs.fedoraproject.org not the old legacy address :)
s/cvs.fedora.redhat.com/cvs.fedoraproject.org/ in the above then :)
I've never had any issues Though, I _really_ ought to update my
On Saturday 23 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 22:06 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 23 August 2008, Rex Dieter wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
Thanks for the reply Rex, even if we do not agree. :)
:) np. I just wanted to avoid the generalization that I perceived
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 01:21 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 23 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 22:06 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 23 August 2008, Rex Dieter wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
Thanks for the reply Rex, even if we do not agree. :)
:)
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 01:28 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
WTH does console-kit have to do with pulseaudio
The person logged into a console is given permission to do certain
things, such as use the sound card, manage removeable media, etc.
Typically, the sort of things that don't share well between
hi all, I've just joined this list :)
I'm facing a problem with a brand new installation on fedora 9.
I did a system update right after the installation, so the samba
packages are of the latest available version (3.2.0-17.fc9).
at the first run, all the tree of tdb files were created under
2008/8/24 Kam Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 22:11 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
Check the length of your downloaded ISO vs. what it _should_ be. Some
http downloads will screw up with a 2GB file...
Likewise with
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:44:15PM +0200, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn_Tore_Sund_
wrote:
Nifty Fedora Mitch chose attack as the best defense:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:36:21AM +1200, Clint Dilks wrote:
Bjoern Tore Sund wrote:
It has now been a full week since the first announcement that Fedora
* Björn Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080824 01:38]:
Anders Karlsson wrote:
[snip]
That is a pretty strong statement to make. Not telling everything does
not equate lying - especially when what you are telling (or can tell)
is true. And if all you have is an impression that he
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 08:35:39AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
It's one of the costs (and, actually, one of the benefits) of working
with open source. With Proprietary you have guarantees. When they
fall down on the job, or when other bad stuff happens, you can
theoretically get some sort of
On Saturday 23 August 2008 22:54:43 Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Friday 22 August 2008 14:21, Colin J Thomson wrote:
On Friday 22 August 2008 14:58:29 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 09:36 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
But the problem I am now facing is shutting down the
Nigel Henry wrote:
On Saturday 23 August 2008 17:00, Per Anton Rønning wrote:
Still no effect. And the funny thing is:
about:plugins now report this:
-
Java(TM) Plug-in 1.6.0_06-b02
File name: libjavaplugin_oji.so
Per Anton Rønning wrote:
expose_full_path gives:
the GCJ Web *Browser Plugin (using IcedTea) 1.2 is found in:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/jre/lib/i386/gcjwebplugin.so
and the Java Plug-in:
/usr/java/jdk1.6.0_07/jre/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so
This is where I found it
Ed Greshko wrote:
Per Anton Rønning wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
Per Anton Rønning wrote:
2) http://www.forex.com
Both these are made for JRE 1.4... are there major revisions in
1.5 that might
cause problems?
This works fine on FF 3.0.1 and Java(TM) Plug-in 1.6.0_07-b06 on
RHELv5. It does
Per Anton Rønning wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
Per Anton Rønning wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
Per Anton Rønning wrote:
2) http://www.forex.com
Both these are made for JRE 1.4... are there major revisions in
1.5 that might
cause problems?
This works fine on FF 3.0.1 and Java(TM) Plug-in
Ed Greshko wrote:
Per Anton Rønning wrote:
expose_full_path gives:
the GCJ Web *Browser Plugin (using IcedTea) 1.2 is found in:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/jre/lib/i386/gcjwebplugin.so
and the Java Plug-in:
/usr/java/jdk1.6.0_07/jre/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so
This is
Ed Greshko wrote:
Per Anton Rønning wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
Per Anton Rønning wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
Per Anton Rønning wrote:
2) http://www.forex.com
Both these are made for JRE 1.4... are there major revisions
in 1.5 that might
cause problems?
This works fine on FF 3.0.1 and
Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
I think he gave you a really good answer too...
pulseaudio doesn't set the user permissions on devices but is handled by
ConsoleKit / HAL
If you give a report on your audio hardware submitted to ConsoleKit
package, they could fix the problem
Hi:
I also experienced the same problem, so I switched over to SUN Java. I did
this as per instructions given at
http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f9.html#java. You may test the
status of your browser with http://webapps.ou.edu/it/browser.
Sivaraman.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Ed
Sorry, I don't saw all discussion. But I know how to make work in F9
pulseaudio.
Just add user to groups: pulse, pulse-access, pulse-rt. Restart server. It's
work for me.
2008/8/24 Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
I think he gave you a really good
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 21:22 -0700, Adil Drissi wrote:
Sorry
here is what i made:
mv includes ../
Then you could do..
mv ../includes .
--
Mike Chambers
Fedora Project - Ambassador, Bug Zapper, Tester, User, etc..
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
Hi
Thanks for all the help. Both my problems have been solved
1. Getting Yum through a proxy server
2. Codecs - thanks Tim for that detailed reply
Today I would like to provide a solution to a problem. See it is easy
to ask questions and tap information. Hopefully I can make someone's
Per Anton Rønning wrote:
rpm -e gave error messages, but yum remove did the trick. And THEN:
The login screen popped up, and everything worked as it used to work
after logging in.
Happy to hear all is now well...
--
It was a book to kill time for those who liked it better dead.
--
TV Sivaraman wrote:
Hi:
I also experienced the same problem, so I switched over to SUN Java. I
did this as per instructions given at
http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f9.html#java. You may
test the status of your browser with http://webapps.ou.edu/it/browser.
Sivaraman.
Thank
Em Sáb 23 Ago 2008, Dave Feustel escreveu:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:33:56PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Dave Feustel writes:
Where can I find the source for Fedora 9 Freecell Solitaire to
hack on?
yumdownloader --source packagename
Thanks! How do I determine what the correct
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 21:07:03 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Adil Drissi wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to cancel one command after execution?
my command was :
mv includes ../includes
i was in /var/www so if a directory includes already existed in /var
it was replaced.
Thank you
I thought my recent Java trouble had bearing on this, but it seems not:
When I play a YouTube video I get the pictures, but no sound.
I have checked the sound gauge embedded in YouTube and this is on top.
When I play CD/DVD I have no sound problem at all . The shockwave player
is installed,
I
Björn Persson asked:
Bjørn Tore Sund wrote:
One thing this
incident has taught us is to take regular backups of that mirror so that we
can roll back to a non-suspect version of the Fedora updates. Didn't have
that before, really missed it the last couple of weeks.
How far would you have
Tim:
Picture this scenario: You plug in your new wireless router, it has no
security settings. You configure it using the HTTP webserver, and
your passwords (any you set into it) are part of the HTML source
code, viewable by anyone else at the same time. Your browser may
display them as
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:22:30 -0700
Russell Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If no one's going to take people seriously when they say they are having
problems with PulseAudio, and people are just going to force PulseAudio
down peoples' throats when it's not working while insisting the problems
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 03:54:46 -0700
Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you give a report on your audio hardware submitted to ConsoleKit
package, they could fix the problem (assuming that someone else hasn't
already reported it).
OK, this is another pet peeve: I know something's wrong. I
I'm sure I missed this somewhere, but has anyone come up with a fix for
the Adobe Reader plugin not displaying anything in Firefox? I've
re-produced this on several machines running F9 x64.
There are no errors - the plugin appears to load, but never actually
displays the PDF file in the browser.
max wrote:
You had no idea there was a security
issue? It was the first thing to cross my mind when I first saw the
announcement. What else could it have been? Why else the cryptic
message?
You're lucky to be that paranoid. Many people would call me paranoid if they
knew what kind of
Gene Heskett wrote:
And thats NOT what I had. I made the mistake of running the sound detector
and it, or pulseaudio overwrote what I had. It should not touch things
unless you specifically tell it to.
Sound detector was a tool to configure your sound cards. It is going
to change things
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Laszlo BERES [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miles Sabin wrote:
The RHEL signing keys have, however, been used by an unauthorized
party to sign unauthorized packages. Some people would say that that
qualified as compromised on any reasonable definition.
Signing is a
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 03:39:05PM +0100, Miles Sabin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Laszlo BERES [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miles Sabin wrote:
The RHEL signing keys have, however, been used by an unauthorized
party to sign unauthorized packages. Some people would say that that
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:49:17AM -0300, Marcelo Magno T. Sales wrote:
Em Sáb 23 Ago 2008, Dave Feustel escreveu:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:33:56PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Dave Feustel writes:
Where can I find the source for Fedora 9 Freecell Solitaire to
hack on?
Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
My log is filling up with:
Aug 23 12:20:36 localhost NetworkManager: info (wlan0): supplicant
connection state change: 6 - 7
Aug 23 12:20:38 localhost NetworkManager: info (wlan0): supplicant
connection state change: 7 - 6
Aug 23 12:20:38 localhost NetworkManager:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 15:19 +0200, Per Anton Rønning wrote:
When I play a YouTube video I get the pictures, but no sound.
This is a FAQ. The Adobe Flash player *may* need libflashsupport to be
able to play sound. Apparently, for some systems, it isn't needed,
hence why it's not a required
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 09:48 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
But what I'm still left wondering is the fundamental question: What
the devil is the problem people imagine exists which they imagine
pulseaudio solves?. I can't even get my brain wrapped around the
motivation for pulseaudio. Simply because
Björn Persson wrote:
max wrote:
You had no idea there was a security
issue? It was the first thing to cross my mind when I first saw the
announcement. What else could it have been? Why else the cryptic
message?
You're lucky to be that paranoid. Many people would call me paranoid if they
You
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 20:43 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
-
bugzilla # ?
I just searched bugzilla for all reports for your e-mail address and
couldn't find any.
Craig
Different email address. #458611
Tim wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 13:07 +0200, Leon Vergottini wrote:
I had the same problem the other day. After choosing it manually from
lists of available authentication methods it worked - as the other guy
says, make sure the router is configured with WPA. I have noticed that
I had to
This may or may not have something to do with the infrastructure
problems. It happened during them.
Having installed F9 on an EeePC 701, I did some removals with
gnome-packagekit, then plugged in a USB CD/DVD drive, and started copying
a bunch of data from my PCs.
Of
Per Anton Rønning wrote:
TV Sivaraman wrote:
Hi:
I also experienced the same problem, so I switched over to SUN Java.
I did this as per instructions given at
http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f9.html#java. You may
test the status of your browser with
Per Anton Rønning wrote:
Per Anton Rønning wrote:
TV Sivaraman wrote:
Hi:
I also experienced the same problem, so I switched over to SUN Java.
I did this as per instructions given at
http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f9.html#java. You may
test the status of your browser with
Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 15:19 +0200, Per Anton Rønning wrote:
When I play a YouTube video I get the pictures, but no sound.
This is a FAQ. The Adobe Flash player *may* need libflashsupport to be
able to play sound. Apparently, for some systems, it isn't needed,
hence why
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:15:26 -0400,
max [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
out and said so. The only reason not to come out and say so boiled down
to a handful of things. An ongoing investigation and/or uncertainty
about what had happened. If you and others want to insist that it was
And
Starting a new thread for this question - please disregard the same
question in then Java plugin thread:
TV Sivaraman wrote:
Hi:
I also experienced the same problem, so I switched over to SUN Java.
I did this as per instructions given at
* Miles Sabin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080824 16:39]:
We know nothing of the sort. In fact the RH announcement suggests
exactly the opposite ... why else distribute a script to check for
compromised RHEL packages?
Because some people don't exclusively use RHN ?
/Anders
--
fedora-list mailing
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
And thats NOT what I had. I made the mistake of running the sound
detector and it, or pulseaudio overwrote what I had. It should not touch
things unless you specifically tell it to.
Sound detector was a tool to
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 09:48 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
But what I'm still left wondering is the fundamental question: What
the devil is the problem people imagine exists which they imagine
pulseaudio solves?. I can't even get my brain wrapped around the
On Sunday 24 August 2008, max wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 20:43 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
-
bugzilla # ?
I just searched bugzilla for all reports for your e-mail address and
couldn't find any.
Craig
Hi:
Did yum install both the kmod-nvidia drivers? One is nvidia GP dependent and
the other kernel dependent (look at
http://livna-dl.reloumirrors.net/fedora/9/i386/). You may also have to
install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia and xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs from the livna
site.
Sivaraman.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008
Hi:
Take a look at http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f9.html#flash to
make the Adopbe Reader plugin to work with firefox.
Sivaraman.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Christopher A. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure I missed this somewhere, but has anyone come up with a fix
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, max wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 20:43 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
-
bugzilla # ?
I just searched bugzilla for all reports for your e-mail address and
couldn't
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 09:59 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 03:54:46 -0700
Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you give a report on your audio hardware submitted to ConsoleKit
package, they could fix the problem (assuming that someone else hasn't
already reported it).
max wrote:
You call it paranoia, I call it common sense. Do the math, I did. I felt
that if it was anything but a security issue then they'd have come right
out and said so. The only reason not to come out and say so boiled down
to a handful of things.
But doesn't a security issue usually
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 01:28 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 20:43 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
-
bugzilla # ?
I just searched bugzilla for all reports for your e-mail address and
couldn't find any.
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 01:21 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
And now, even samba seems to have failed, with ubuntu apparently using an
incompatible version. I was backing up the kubuntu's machines /home
directory with amanda, but I never got around to rebuilding the amanda client
after finding
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 02:38 -0400, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 01:21 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
If you do have such a setup, please share how you did it. Show *me* the
.conf
files that achieve that. Examples are worth 10k words (inflation) you know.
I've seen ALOT of
Les Mikesell wrote:
max wrote:
You call it paranoia, I call it common sense. Do the math, I did. I
felt that if it was anything but a security issue then they'd have
come right out and said so. The only reason not to come out and say so
boiled down to a handful of things.
But doesn't a
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 09:48 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:22:30 -0700
Russell Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If no one's going to take people seriously when they say they are having
problems with PulseAudio, and people are just going to force PulseAudio
down
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Michael Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/24 Kam Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 22:11 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
Check the length of your downloaded ISO vs. what it _should_ be.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Anders Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Miles Sabin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080824 16:39]:
We know nothing of the sort. In fact the RH announcement suggests
exactly the opposite ... why else distribute a script to check for
compromised RHEL packages?
Because
Hi,
I followed the instruction at the resources website:
$yum install kmod-nvidia
nothing else was specified. I saw that there were kernel updates, so I guess
some of it was kernel dependent.
But I did not really know in detail what else to look for, so the rest
went past me.
There was a
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 01:28 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 20:43 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
-
bugzilla # ?
I just searched bugzilla for all reports for
Hi,
I am trying to develop an add-in (in C++) for OpenOffice.org Calc, and after a
while I have found
out that I need to use the same compiler used to compile OO otherwise anything
could go wrong.
http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?t=21536
In my case, exceptions are not caught, but
TV Sivaraman wrote:
Hi:
Did yum install both the kmod-nvidia drivers? One is nvidia GP
dependent and the other kernel dependent (look at
http://livna-dl.reloumirrors.net/fedora/9/i386/). You may also have to
install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia and xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs from the
livna site.
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 09:31 +0200, Massimo Maiurana wrote:
hi all, I've just joined this list :)
I'm facing a problem with a brand new installation on fedora 9.
I did a system update right after the installation, so the samba
packages are of the latest available version (3.2.0-17.fc9).
at
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 13:08 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
as has already been pointed out - I don't think that there's much point
in going farther except to point out the thing that you don't seem to
get...unlike all other sound daemons, pulseaudio is
Craig White wrote:
You don't seem to care that things like NetworkManager and PulseAudio
are trying to solve userland device control over things that have on
Linux been traditionally root controlled devices/daemons.
Both NetworkManager and PulseAudio are not perfect - in fact, far from
perfect
Gene Heskett wrote:
That isn't always true Craig, I have been denied permissions on several
occasions. It always surprised me at the time I don't now recall a
specific instance I can quote, but it has happened in the past and will no
doubt occur at some point in the future. ATM, not
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 01:21 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
And now, even samba seems to have failed, with ubuntu apparently using an
incompatible version. I was backing up the kubuntu's machines /home
directory with amanda, but I never got around to
I was trying to follow the guide at gPXE for installing Fedora Core 9
with an iSCSI only disc. I cant get the machine to boot, grub starts then it
fails as soon as it loads the kernel. Anyone done this and have any ideas
on how to accomplish this? Do I need to make a custom initrd?
Thanks!
jlc
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Russell Miller wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
That isn't always true Craig, I have been denied permissions on several
occasions. It always surprised me at the time I don't now recall a
specific instance I can quote, but it has happened in the past and will no
doubt
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 10:18 -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
Craig White wrote:
You don't seem to care that things like NetworkManager and PulseAudio
are trying to solve userland device control over things that have on
Linux been traditionally root controlled devices/daemons.
Both
Anders Karlsson wrote:
* Björn Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080823 18:57]:
Rahul Sundaram quoted Paul W. Frields:
[snip]
Disclosure at an inappropriate time gives people the mistaken impression
one is not being truthful, when that's not the case.
The first announcement gave me the impression
Gene Heskett wrote:
pulseaudio doesn't set the user permissions on devices but is handled by
ConsoleKit / HAL
If you give a report on your audio hardware submitted to ConsoleKit
package, they could fix the problem (assuming that someone else hasn't
already reported it).
'Scuse me, Craig,
Craig White wrote:
I think you have personalized these things as if they were intended to
make your attempts to use Fedora more difficult.
No. Not personalized. I know they're not intended to make my attempts
to use Fedora more difficult. If anything, I'd say they were intended
to make
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 13:23 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 01:21 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
And now, even samba seems to have failed, with ubuntu apparently using an
incompatible version. I was backing up the kubuntu's machines
Les Mikesell wrote:
You must have missed a lot - this was discussed to death when people
first had problems with pulseaudio. Consolekit assumes that the
speakers are owned exclusively by whoever happens to be logged into
the console at the moment. Personally I think this is as bad as if
Björn Persson wrote:
max wrote:
You had no idea there was a security
issue? It was the first thing to cross my mind when I first saw the
announcement. What else could it have been? Why else the cryptic
message?
You're lucky to be that paranoid. Many people would call me paranoid if they
knew
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 21:56:14 +, g wrote:
Beartooth wrote:
I have a popup saying
failed to get a TID: Incorrect path with ';' returned!
'grep TID /var/log/*'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# grep TID /var/log/*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
shrug
I meant to mention that I get
1 - 100 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
