Remove uses of %{PACKAGE_VERSION} and %{PACKAGE_RELEASE} from specs

2009-12-04 Thread Panu Matilainen
Grepping through spec files from CVS devel/ shows there are a handful of package still using %{PACKAGE_VERSION} and %{PACKAGE_RELEASE} macros. These were considered backwards compatibility stuff in 1998 (yes, eleven years ago) already, please change them to use the %{version} and %{release}

Re: Remove uses of %{PACKAGE_VERSION} and %{PACKAGE_RELEASE} from specs

2009-12-04 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote: Grepping through spec files from CVS devel/ shows there are a handful of package still using %{PACKAGE_VERSION} and %{PACKAGE_RELEASE} macros. These were considered backwards compatibility stuff in 1998 (yes,

Re: Remove uses of %{PACKAGE_VERSION} and %{PACKAGE_RELEASE} from specs

2009-12-04 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:57:47 +0100, Panu Matilainen wrote: handful of package still using %{PACKAGE_VERSION} and %{PACKAGE_RELEASE} macros. ... - libunwind Fixed: libunwind-0.99-0.13.20090430betagit4b8404d1.fc13 Jan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com

Re: Remove uses of %{PACKAGE_VERSION} and %{PACKAGE_RELEASE} from specs

2009-12-04 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 07:04:12AM -0200, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: - glibc32, glibc64 (dead packages?) yes No. They are needed in the build system. They just havent been updated since FC6 or so. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com

Orphaning some packages...

2009-12-04 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
I'd like to turn over the following packages to someone else to maintain since I have no time or interest in keeping up with them going forward: * rubygem-activeldap -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among

Re: FreeType patented bytecode interpreter now in rawhide

2009-12-04 Thread Matěj Cepl
Dne 4.12.2009 01:13, Behdad Esfahbod napsal(a): Since the patents covering the TrueType bytecode interpreter expired at the end of October, I've now built FreeType in rawhide with that part of code enabled. can we hope for the update in F12 as well, please? Note that the subpixel stuff

Orphaning gnome-common

2009-12-04 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
This is a heads up that I'm going to orphan gnome-common. I don't do any gtk programming anymore so it doesn't make sense for me to keep this package. mclasen has done several of the recently needed updates to this package; if he and the desktop team would like to take it over let me know; I'll

Re: FreeType patented bytecode interpreter now in rawhide

2009-12-04 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Ven 4 décembre 2009 13:50, Matěj Cepl a écrit : Dne 4.12.2009 01:13, Behdad Esfahbod napsal(a): Since the patents covering the TrueType bytecode interpreter expired at the end of October, I've now built FreeType in rawhide with that part of code enabled. can we hope for the update in

Re: FreeType patented bytecode interpreter now in rawhide

2009-12-04 Thread Ilyes Gouta
Finally! It was like a non-ending movie through all these years, having such one essential/basic feature disabled. An update for F12, whenever it gets ready, would be really welcome! Given how any font rendering changes seems to degrade font rendering for some The TrueType bytecode interpreter

Re: Blocking radeonhd (was Re: Fedora 12 Graphics Issues: Cancel F13 and concentrate on fixing F12 ?)

2009-12-04 Thread Bill Nottingham
Hans Ulrich Niedermann (h...@n-dimensional.de) said: The big issue is with KMS on using radeonhd is like shooting yourself in the face. Either we need to patch radeonhd in Fedora to not start with KMS enabled or remove it from the distro. I am working on such a patch to radeonhd

Re: FreeType patented bytecode interpreter now in rawhide

2009-12-04 Thread Kevin Kofler
Matěj Cepl wrote: can we hope for the update in F12 as well, please? Well, that would change the looks of our default DejaVu fonts a lot. (freetype-freeworld currently disables the BCI for the DejaVu family by default for that reason, which has always been a controversial move, I'll of course

FESCo meeting summary for 2009-12-04

2009-12-04 Thread Bill Nottingham
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCo meeting 20091204 === Meeting started by notting at 17:00:23 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-12-04/fesco.2009-12-04-17.00.log.html . Meeting

Re: F12: NetworkManager-Firefox: Firefox is currently in offline mode and can't browse the Web

2009-12-04 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 16:52 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) said: ONBOOT=yes BOOTPROTO=dhcp TYPE=Wireless NM_CONTROLLED=yes USERCTL=yes PEERDNS=yes IPV6INIT=no MODE=Auto This is the problem. Auto is not a valid mode. It's a valid

Re: Proposed F13 feature: drop separate updates repository

2009-12-04 Thread Jesse Keating
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 06:51 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: We wouldn't be talking about removing the original GA set - just adding updated pkgs into the path. Woa!!! With all due respect, but this would seem an stupid and silly plan to me. The only way not to do that would be to maintain

Re: F12: NetworkManager-Firefox: Firefox is currently in offline mode and can't browse the Web

2009-12-04 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 10:55 -0800, Dan Williams wrote: On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 16:52 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) said: ONBOOT=yes BOOTPROTO=dhcp TYPE=Wireless NM_CONTROLLED=yes USERCTL=yes PEERDNS=yes IPV6INIT=no MODE=Auto

Upstart 0.6.3 coming to a rawhide near you

2009-12-04 Thread Bill Nottingham
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Upstart0.6.0 was approved at today's FESCo meeting. We hope to land this in the next week or so. What this means for you (for very specific values of you): If you own any of the following packages, you have upstart job files that will need modified for

Re: Upstart 0.6.3 coming to a rawhide near you

2009-12-04 Thread Bill Nottingham
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said: Obvious FAQ: Q: Should we port our SysV scripts to native upstart scripts? A: No, not at this time. Q: I'd like to play with it before it lands. A: There's a repo at http://notting.fedorapeople.org/upstart0.6/. You can also check the new upstart

Re: Upstart 0.6.3 coming to a rawhide near you

2009-12-04 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:10:34PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Upstart0.6.0 The features highlight list has: Communication with the init daemon over D-Bus. Questions? Comments? Does this mean that running dbus will be required to reboot/shutdown the

Re: Upstart 0.6.3 coming to a rawhide near you

2009-12-04 Thread Bill Nottingham
Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) said: On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:10:34PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Upstart0.6.0 The features highlight list has: Communication with the init daemon over D-Bus. Questions? Comments? Does this mean

Re: Upstart 0.6.3 coming to a rawhide near you

2009-12-04 Thread Sir Gallantmon
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) said: On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:10:34PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Upstart0.6.0 The features highlight list has: Communication

Re: Upstart 0.6.3 coming to a rawhide near you

2009-12-04 Thread Rudolf Kastl
Why aren't the sysVinit scripts being ported over to native upstart scripts? I thought the reason why upstart was adopted was to be able to utilize the benefits of native upstart scripts (event based daemon handling, etc.)? No one is holding you back from starting to convert them now, but the

Re: Upstart 0.6.3 coming to a rawhide near you

2009-12-04 Thread James Antill
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 16:45 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) said: On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:10:34PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Upstart0.6.0 The features highlight list has: Communication with the init

Re: Fedora 12 Graphics Issues: Cancel F13 and concentrate on fixing F12 ?

2009-12-04 Thread Kevin Kofler
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote: How about visually impaired people? Compiz and the zoom plugin *are* essential to them. They can use the plain old KMag which doesn't require any sort of compositing at all. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com

Re: Proposed F13 feature: drop separate updates repository

2009-12-04 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/03/2009 07:22 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 06:24 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: People doing network installs can either add the updates repo to their kickstart, or check the box in the anaconda UI, so that the updates repos are considered at install time. No download of

Re: Fedora 12 Graphics Issues: Cancel F13 and concentrate on fixing F12 ?

2009-12-04 Thread Sir Gallantmon
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote: How about visually impaired people? Compiz and the zoom plugin *are* essential to them. They can use the plain old KMag which doesn't require any sort of compositing at all.

Re: Proposed F13 feature: drop separate updates repository

2009-12-04 Thread Orion Poplawski
On Fri, December 4, 2009 9:20 pm, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/03/2009 07:22 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 06:24 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Yes, for people who are doing full featured networked installs w/ custom kickstart files. I've never met such a person. Really? I

Re: Proposed F13 feature: drop separate updates repository

2009-12-04 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/05/2009 06:22 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On Fri, December 4, 2009 9:20 pm, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/03/2009 07:22 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 06:24 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Yes, for people who are doing full featured networked installs w/ custom kickstart

UPDATE: Final F-10 updates push date revised

2009-12-04 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:31:35PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: Hi All, Fedora 10 will go EOL on December 17th. The final day for updates to be submitted will be December 14th. Please make sure any final updates you want pushed to the F10 repos are submitted by this date. Due to the infrastructure

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Red Hat Bugzilla 3.4 Upgrade Public Beta

2009-12-04 Thread James Laska
Greetings, I am sending this on behalf of Dave Lawrence and the bugzilla team at Red Hat. Fedora uses this instance of bugzilla too. Please forward this on to any appropriate lists that were missed. Thanks, James == Greetings, The Red Hat Bugzilla team is happy to

[Bug 543906] [ml_IN] Conjunct 'sple' (as in display) is not rendered correctly with Meera font

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543906 --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-12-04 03:30:44 EDT --- can you update which pango version you

[Bug 543906] [ml_IN] Conjunct 'sple' (as in display) is not rendered correctly with Meera font

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543906 --- Comment #3 from Praveen Arimbrathodiyil parim...@redhat.com 2009-12-04 03:50:02 EDT --- pr...@savannah:~$ apt-cache

[Bug 544213] New: [mr_IN] contains wrong shape at unicode reserved location

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [mr_IN] contains wrong shape at unicode reserved location https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544213 Summary: [mr_IN] contains wrong shape at unicode

[Issue 105084] OpenSymbol font: Math related changes

2009-12-04 Thread tl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105084 User tl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[Issue 105085] math: OpenSymbol font overhaul will require code changes

2009-12-04 Thread tl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105085 This issue depends on issue 105084, which changed state: What|Old value |New value

[Bug 543906] [ml_IN] Conjunct 'sple' (as in display) is not rendered correctly with Meera font

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543906 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 532237] gedit defaults to bitmap fonts with kanji

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532237 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 532237] gedit defaults to bitmap fonts with kanji

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532237 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 532237] gedit defaults to bitmap fonts with kanji

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532237 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-04 04:43:19 EDT ---

[Bug 532237] gedit defaults to bitmap fonts with kanji

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532237 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-04 04:42:02 EDT ---

[Bug 543906] [ml_IN] Conjunct 'sple' (as in display) is not rendered correctly with Meera font

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543906 --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-12-04 05:16:24 EDT --- while investigating more, This bug is

[Bug 543906] [ml_IN] Conjunct 'sple' (as in display) is not rendered correctly with Meera font

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543906 --- Comment #6 from Praveen Arimbrathodiyil parim...@redhat.com 2009-12-04 07:44:30 EDT --- conjunct 'spa' is changed its

[Bug 543906] [ml_IN] Conjunct 'sple' (as in display) is not rendered correctly with Meera font

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543906 --- Comment #7 from Praveen Arimbrathodiyil parim...@redhat.com 2009-12-04 07:51:13 EDT --- Created an attachment

[Bug 543906] [ml_IN] Conjunct 'sple' (as in display) is not rendered correctly with Meera font

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543906 --- Comment #8 from Praveen Arimbrathodiyil parim...@redhat.com 2009-12-04 07:53:06 EDT --- Created an attachment

[Issue 105084] OpenSymbol font: Math related changes

2009-12-04 Thread tl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105084 User tl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[Bug 529196] Review Request: ms-anonymouspro-fonts - AnonymousPro fonts

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-04 18:36:39 EDT ---

[Bug 532237] gedit defaults to bitmap fonts with kanji

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532237 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-04 18:41:39 EDT ---

[Bug 532237] gedit defaults to bitmap fonts with kanji

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532237 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 532237] gedit defaults to bitmap fonts with kanji

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532237 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-04 18:40:39 EDT ---

[Bug 532237] gedit defaults to bitmap fonts with kanji

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532237 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-04 19:01:12 EDT ---

[Bug 532237] gedit defaults to bitmap fonts with kanji

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532237 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: FreeType patented bytecode interpreter now in rawhide

2009-12-04 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Ven 4 décembre 2009 13:50, Matěj Cepl a écrit : Dne 4.12.2009 01:13, Behdad Esfahbod napsal(a): Since the patents covering the TrueType bytecode interpreter expired at the end of October, I've now built FreeType in rawhide with that part of code enabled. can we hope for the update in

Re: FreeType patented bytecode interpreter now in rawhide

2009-12-04 Thread Caius 'kaio' Chance
(2009年12月04日 23:49), Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Ven 4 décembre 2009 13:50, Matěj Cepl a écrit : Dne 4.12.2009 01:13, Behdad Esfahbod napsal(a): Since the patents covering the TrueType bytecode interpreter expired at the end of October, I've now built FreeType in rawhide with that part of code

Re: Introduction

2009-12-04 Thread Mike McGrath
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Patrick Day wrote: Hello All, My name is Patrick Day, and I have been using Fedora for a few years now, and I absolutely enjoy working with it. I like it so much in fact that I have decided to contribute to the Fedora community. I have been a Software Test Engineer in

F12 upgrade on lenova - desktop issues.

2009-12-04 Thread William Henry
Hi, I upgraded to F12 using the preupgrade over the internet option. I had done this with F11 with great success. Now that I can see the working desktop it is looking pretty much the same as my F11 setup. However I have a problem when I reboot in my docking station with the external monitor

[Fedora-legal-list] Abobe RGB ICC profiles in Fedora

2009-12-04 Thread Richard Hughes
I have a legal question regarding distributing Abobe RGB ICC profiles in Fedora. I am soon to package gnome-color-manager for Fedora (GPLv2+), but it requires additional data to be really useful. To actually use a colour managed workflow, you need a set of standard profiles. Profiles are just

[Fedora-legal-list] Re: sRGB ICC profiles in Fedora

2009-12-04 Thread Richard Hughes
2009/12/4 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com: I have a legal question regarding distributing Abobe RGB ICC profiles in Fedora. Another email about profiles (sorry!), just a different licence this time. I want to ship the official ICC sRGB profiles available here in Fedora:

[Fedora-legal-list] Re: Abobe RGB ICC profiles in Fedora

2009-12-04 Thread Richard Hughes
2009/12/4 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com: Can anyone give me any advice on whether the Adobe licence agreement would be valid for profiles shipped in Fedora? This may be of interest: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/openicc/2005q4/000668.html It's an invitation from the Adobe guys to

Re: F12 Lost Gnome Panels

2009-12-04 Thread Tim
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 21:44 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: Using root to fix things is not usually required And isn't going to work for fixing up personal settings, you'd end up customising the root login, instead of your own. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't

Re: Flash for my new F12/64 install

2009-12-04 Thread Tim
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 10:45 +0530, Jatin K wrote: just download the flash plugin from the following[1] link (please note that link is valid only for 1 week ) [1] http://senduit.com/8913b8 It might be unwise to get files from some third-party source, which could be compromised or just plain

OT M.I.T. TED new way of I/O

2009-12-04 Thread Mick M.
Whoa check this video out: http://www.snotr.com/video/3471 same but 3rd person: http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/pattie_maes_demos_the_sixth_sense.html Mick M. Standard guarantee applies - 30 feet or 30 seconds, whichever comes first. # find / -name *your base* -exec chown us:us {} \;

Dialup PPPD with Network Manager in F12

2009-12-04 Thread David
I'm seeking advice on the use of plain old dialup pppd and Network Manager. My internet access is provided by 56kbit/s dialup modem on /dev/ttyS0 on a desktop pc which also has an ethernet NIC that gives CUPS, backup, NFS, internet services to another notebook pc. DSL is not available here due to

Problem with screen resolution after installing F12

2009-12-04 Thread Dick Roark
After installing Fedora 12 I am having problems setting up 1280x1024 screen resolution. Only 640x480 and 800x600 are available. I was using F11 at 1280x1024 on this hardware before upgrading to F12. After that, so far no joy. I would appreciate any helpful info. I have also tried using various

Re: Flash for my new F12/64 install

2009-12-04 Thread Jatin K
On 12/04/2009 01:54 PM, Tim wrote: On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 10:45 +0530, Jatin K wrote: just download the flash plugin from the following[1] link (please note that link is valid only for 1 week ) [1] http://senduit.com/8913b8 It might be unwise to get files from some third-party

PLaying .ram files in F12 with kaffeine crashes with a xine error message

2009-12-04 Thread Joachim Backes
Hi, Trying to play some .ram files with kaffeine crashes with the error message: xine is asking to seek behind the end of the data stream The line in the ram file is exactly: rtsp://mmlstreamerb.rhrk.uni-kl.de/mml/Neunzert_Werth.rm Additionally, getting some weird error popup window

Re: provider for google calendar

2009-12-04 Thread Dave Cross
2009/12/4 oleksandr korneta aten...@gmail.com: so I'm  on Fedora 12, 64bit. It was an unpleasant surprise to find out that that some extensions for thunderbird from mozilla's website cannot be installed because of 64bit architecture (wtf? is this opensource or what?). Yes I'm talking about

Re: PLaying .ram files in F12 with kaffeine crashes with a xine error message

2009-12-04 Thread Mogens Kjaer
On 12/04/2009 10:28 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: Hi, Trying to play some .ram files with kaffeine crashes with the error message: ... Any solution for this problem? The link works with vlc from rpmfusion. Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10,

Re: PLaying .ram files in F12 with kaffeine crashes with a xine error message

2009-12-04 Thread Joachim Backes
On 12/04/2009 10:46 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote: On 12/04/2009 10:28 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: Hi, Trying to play some .ram files with kaffeine crashes with the error message: ... Any solution for this problem? The link works with vlc from rpmfusion. Mogens Hi Mogens, did not help:

Re: Flash for my new F12/64 install

2009-12-04 Thread Tim
Tim: It might be unwise to get files from some third-party source, which could be compromised or just plain broken. And unnecessary when you can get them directly from the people who made the file. Jatin K: I've uploaded that file.. I've got it from adobe ( downloaded from

Re: PLaying .ram files in F12 with kaffeine crashes with a xine error message

2009-12-04 Thread Mogens Kjaer
On 12/04/2009 11:12 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: ... did not help: vlc-1.0.3-1.fc12.i686 was (and is) already installed. Have you tried: vlc rtsp://mmlstreamerb.rhrk.uni-kl.de/mml/Neunzert_Werth.rm This works for me. Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department Gamle Carlsberg

Re: provider for google calendar

2009-12-04 Thread Suvayu Ali
Hello Oleksandr, On Thursday 03 December 2009 04:30 PM, suvayu ali wrote: 2009/12/3 oleksandr kornetaaten...@gmail.com: Yes I'm talking about lightning calendar extension. Anyway, turns out some good people did package it and put in repository. But it is useless for me without the Provider

Re: PLaying .ram files in F12 with kaffeine crashes with a xine error message

2009-12-04 Thread Joachim Backes
On 12/04/2009 11:16 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote: On 12/04/2009 11:12 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: ... did not help: vlc-1.0.3-1.fc12.i686 was (and is) already installed. Have you tried: vlc rtsp://mmlstreamerb.rhrk.uni-kl.de/mml/Neunzert_Werth.rm This works for me. Mogens Works for me too (as

Re: Flash for my new F12/64 install

2009-12-04 Thread Jatin K
On 12/04/2009 03:43 PM, Tim wrote: Tim: It might be unwise to get files from some third-party source, which could be compromised or just plain broken. And unnecessary when you can get them directly from the people who made the file. Jatin K: I've uploaded that file..

Re: ath5k access point in Fedora 12

2009-12-04 Thread James Allsopp
From the sounds of this, it appears teh new ath5k ath9k's aren't really ready for use. I think I'll try and find an old madwifi driver in the repositories. 2009/12/4 Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com 2009/12/3 Reuben Budiardja techl...@pathfinder.phys.utk.edu: On Thursday 03 December 2009

installing fedora packages on RHEL -- how bad the craziness?

2009-12-04 Thread Robert P. J. Day
actually, this is technically about installing fedora packages on centos 5.4 but, obviously, the same issues apply. and i asked about this on the centos list but i'd like the fedora perspective as well. the short version -- someone running centos 5.4 needs a fairly new version of

Fedora 12 KDE live CD Password

2009-12-04 Thread Rahul Tidke
Hello, I was eager to try F12 live CD; but I am unable to login to fedora 12 KDE live cd (i686). What is the password for user liveuser? Why does a live CD requires username password? Thank you. Regards, Rahul Tidke -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe:

Re: Announcing the Release of the World's First 64-bit Build of Google's Chromium OS with Xen Virtualization Support

2009-12-04 Thread Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
*Detailed Instructions for Using the Bundled Xen 3.4.3-RC1-pre and 64-bit Google Chrome OS Live USB Image to Create a Fedora 11 Linux PV Virtual Machine/Guest Operating System/DomU* After you have transferred the ChromiumOS64-Xen VMDK image file to a USB external harddisk or an IDE/SATA/SCSI

Re: Adobe AIR not install on F12 x86_64

2009-12-04 Thread Sergio Augusto Vladisauskis
Tanks for help Martin! I looking FedoraForum any time now. Adobe AIR works for me. On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:06:40 +, Martin Airs camberw...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/03/2009 04:52 PM, Sergio Augusto Vladisauskis wrote: I try install Adobe AIR for applications but not show install window. I

Re: Announcing the Release of the World's First 64-bit Build of Google's Chromium OS with Xen Virtualization Support

2009-12-04 Thread Michal
Can report the download from chromium website works on ESXi4 Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: _*Detailed Instructions for Using the Bundled Xen 3.4.3-RC1-pre and 64-bit Google Chrome OS Live USB Image to Create a Fedora 11 Linux PV Virtual Machine/Guest Operating System/DomU*_ After

Re: Announcing the Release of the World's First 64-bit Build of Google's Chromium OS with Xen Virtualization Support

2009-12-04 Thread Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Michal mic...@ionic.co.uk wrote: Can report the download from chromium website works on ESXi4 Dear Michal, Thank you for downloading and trying out ChromiumOS64! May I know which is the version/build you downloaded? -- Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)

Re: Announcing the Release of the World's First 64-bit Build of Google's Chromium OS with Xen Virtualization Support

2009-12-04 Thread Michal
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Michal mic...@ionic.co.uk mailto:mic...@ionic.co.uk wrote: Can report the download from chromium website works on ESXi4 Dear Michal, Thank you for downloading and trying out ChromiumOS64! May I know which is

Re: Announcing the Release of the World's First 64-bit Build of Google's Chromium OS with Xen Virtualization Support

2009-12-04 Thread Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Michal mic...@ionic.co.uk wrote: Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Michal mic...@ionic.co.uk mailto:mic...@ionic.co.uk wrote: Can report the download from chromium website works on ESXi4 Dear Michal, Thank

Re: installing fedora packages on RHEL -- how bad the craziness?

2009-12-04 Thread Ed Greshko
Robert P. J. Day wrote: actually, this is technically about installing fedora packages on centos 5.4 but, obviously, the same issues apply. and i asked about this on the centos list but i'd like the fedora perspective as well. the short version -- someone running centos 5.4 needs a

Re: Adobe AIR not install on F12 x86_64

2009-12-04 Thread Martin Airs
Thats no problem at all, you'll find fedoraforum a very helpful place, I use it all the time good luck Martin On 12/04/2009 12:07 PM, Sergio Augusto Vladisauskis wrote: Tanks for help Martin! I looking FedoraForum any time now. Adobe AIR works for me. On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:06:40 +,

Re: installing fedora packages on RHEL -- how bad the craziness?

2009-12-04 Thread Martin Airs
Could you not install from sources get poppler.?.?.?.src.rpm then rpmbuild --rebuild poppler.?.?.?.src.rpm that should build you a centos rpm Martin On 12/04/2009 11:26 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: actually, this is technically about installing fedora packages on centos 5.4 but,

Re: F12 installs report here.

2009-12-04 Thread steven bellens
Hi all, Yesterday I finally start the upgrade process from f11 KDE x86_64 to f12 KDE x86_64. I tried it with the preupgrade method as described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PreUpgrade I made some space in /boot first, just to make sure, and it turned out there was not a problem there.

Re: F12 Lost Gnome Panels

2009-12-04 Thread BeartoothHOS
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:36:52 -0500, William Witt wrote: [] This is probably the problem. A partial copy or corrupted .gconf directory. So try this: -After a reboot at the login screen press Crtl+Alt F2 -Log in text mode with your user acct -issue the following commands mv

Re: Assistance finding out what process is writing to the disk drive

2009-12-04 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 15:57 +, Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Cronenworth wrote: John Nissley wrote: I do not know what is causing the disk drive light to stay on now. # yum install blktrace $ man blktrace # btrace /dev/sda Invalid debug path /sys/kernel/debug: 0/Success Mmm,

F12 Upgrade: Rebooting Over, and over, and....

2009-12-04 Thread Chris
As the topic says, I updated last night and this morning I rebooted (new kernel) and all my box does is go off into reboot oblivion. Any help would be appreciated. Else, a reinstall from media tonight and possibly NOT install the new kernel? On another not - The tip on not using 3rd part

Re: FC10 and RedHat NTFS file format compatibility

2009-12-04 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 21:06 -0500, Todd Denniston wrote: Daniel J Celta wrote, On 3 Dec 2009 17:45:33 -0600: Ok I got it... My appologies Sent from my iPhone Daniel J Celta Is it possible to convince those phones to bottom post? Yes, on iPhones it's just a matter of

Re: Assistance finding out what process is writing to the disk drive

2009-12-04 Thread David García Granda
Hi, Thanks for the IOTOP command.  It does not show me much in this case.  I do not know what is causing the disk drive light to stay on now. The disk drive light works fine until about 5 minutes after boot up.  then the hard drive light goes crazy and stays on solid.  I can not really tell

Re: OT M.I.T. TED new way of I/O

2009-12-04 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 00:39 -0800, Mick M. wrote: Whoa check this video out: http://www.snotr.com/video/3471 same but 3rd person: http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/pattie_maes_demos_the_sixth_sense.html Two things: 1) The video is from March 2009, so it's not even current. 2) It has

Re: installing fedora packages on RHEL -- how bad the craziness?

2009-12-04 Thread Ryan Lynch
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 08:31, Martin Airs camberw...@gmail.com wrote: Could you not install from sources get poppler.?.?.?.src.rpm then rpmbuild --rebuild poppler.?.?.?.src.rpm that should build you a centos rpm At work, some of my colleagues prefer to compile and install from source into

Re: Assistance finding out what process is writing to the disk drive

2009-12-04 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Michael Cronenworth wrote: John Nissley wrote: I do not know what is causing the disk drive light to stay on now. # yum install blktrace # mount a /sys/kernel/debug -t debugfs $ man blktrace Yeah... I left out one step. Sorry 'bout that. -- fedora-list mailing list

Obtaining an RPM for the proper old atheros madwifi driver, not ath5k

2009-12-04 Thread James Allsopp
Hi, I'm running Fedora 12, and was wondering if anyone knew of a repository which contains one of hte old atheros drivers. I want to get rid of ath5k as it doesn't seem to have a good reputation, sounds very experimental still, and I can't make an access point with it without a hostapd0.6 rpm.

Re: Obtaining an RPM for the proper old atheros madwifi driver, not ath5k

2009-12-04 Thread Rodney Morris
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:17 AM, James Allsopp jamesaalls...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I'm running Fedora 12, and was wondering if anyone knew of a repository which contains one of hte old atheros drivers. I want to get rid of ath5k as it doesn't seem to have a good reputation, sounds very

Re: Obtaining an RPM for the proper old atheros madwifi driver, not ath5k

2009-12-04 Thread James Allsopp
No, what's there is the ath5k drivers labelled as madwifi, not the original useful drivers. 2009/12/4 Rodney Morris rodamor...@gmail.com On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:17 AM, James Allsopp jamesaalls...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I'm running Fedora 12, and was wondering if anyone knew of a

Re: Problem with screen resolution after installing F12

2009-12-04 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 17:12:16 +0800, Dick Roark linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote: After installing Fedora 12 I am having problems setting up 1280x1024 screen resolution. Only 640x480 and 800x600 are available. I was using F11 at 1280x1024 on this hardware before upgrading to F12. After that,

Re: Fedora 12 KDE live CD Password

2009-12-04 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 17:26:14 +0530, Rahul Tidke ra...@excelize.com wrote: Hello, I was eager to try F12 live CD; but I am unable to login to fedora 12 KDE live cd (i686). What is the password for user liveuser? Why does a live CD requires username password? It shouldn't. Did you try

Re: Problem with screen resolution after installing F12

2009-12-04 Thread Greg Woods
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 10:51 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: Probably your monitor isn't doing EDID correctly and the video drivers are playing things safe. For the record, many older monitors (my desktop monitor at work is about 3 years old) appear not to do EDID at all. If it does do EDID

Re: Problem with screen resolution after installing F12

2009-12-04 Thread Tony Nelson
On 09-12-04 04:12:16, Dick Roark wrote: After installing Fedora 12 I am having problems setting up 1280x1024 screen resolution. Only 640x480 and 800x600 are available. I was using F11 at 1280x1024 on this hardware before upgrading to F12. After that, so far no joy. I would appreciate any

  1   2   >