Hello, fedora-buildsys-list:
Recently, one of my building hosts's mock directory usually be filled with
build directories, I wonder why the build directories of finishing building
task not to be removed immediately for make room for the coming task , yet
they don't stay here untill some time
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:10:34PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Upstart0.6.0
[...]
If you own any of the following packages, you have upstart job files that
will need modified for any needed format changes, and the new location.
* vpnc
What this means for you (for very specific values of you):
If you own any of the following packages, you have upstart job files that
will need modified for any needed format changes, and the new location.
* olpc-utils pbrobinson
We're willing to do the legwork for you, or you
Now that FESCo has approved new major RPM version for F-13 and the public
beta is officially out... it's going to hit rawhide in a few hours.
Couple of practical issues:
- Soname bump is involved, so anything directly linking to librpm
needs to be rebuilt. This includes deltarpm, gdb,
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:48:12AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
I was informed that wordpress uses bundled libraries and would like to
request an exception from FESCo.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544720
You need to have an explanation of why an exception would be
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 03:32:59PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
- The new version has integrated support for extracting OCaml
dependencies, this clashes with the existing ocaml-dependency
extraction mechanism in Fedora. Notably rpm-build conflicts with current
ocaml-runtime, and the
2009/12/7 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:48:12AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
I was informed that wordpress uses bundled libraries and would like to
request an exception from FESCo.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544720
You need to have an
Conrad Meyer wrote:
I guess the advantage of sed-ing out only the strip-static-archive is that
the native binaries get stripped.
Right. Otherwise you end up with unstripped binaries and no or an empty
-debuginfo package, not quite ideal.
By the way, perhaps that %define should be changed to
2009/12/7 Panu Matilainen pmati...@redhat.com:
Now that FESCo has approved new major RPM version for F-13 and the public
beta is officially out... it's going to hit rawhide in a few hours.
I remember hearing a rumour about automagic OSGi dependency
resolution... Is that something that's
On 12/08/2009 03:59 AM, Mat Booth wrote:
2009/12/7 Panu Matilainen
Now that FESCo has approved new major RPM version for F-13 and the public
beta is officially out... it's going to hit rawhide in a few hours.
I remember hearing a rumour about automagic OSGi dependency
resolution... Is
During FUDCon, we've been working on revising the Fedora release criteria.
John Poelstra had already fleshed out a structure and much of the final
content, and we've been revising and tweaking it in conjunction with QA
(myself, Will Woods and James Laska), release engineering (Jesse Keating),
On 12/02/2009 07:09 PM, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi all,
the Parallel XZ just reached usable state so if you want to take
advantage of parallel LZMA compression, please give it a try before
its inclusion into Fedora.
PXZ homepage is:
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/pxz/
Are you moving this to
Hi,
First of all, I'm not the maintainer of LAM, but since Doug seems to be
busy with other things I took the liberty of taking things into my own
hands:
I really would like everything to confer to the MPI guidelines in Fedora
13, but the problem is that so far no-one has volunteered to rework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459
--- Comment #44 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-12-07 03:23:30
EDT ---
Not sure how TC users feel about zenhei
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105085
User tl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105085
--- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Mon Dec 7 09:01:05 +
2009 ---
Fixed in CWS tl76.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545004
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541888
Tobias Ringstrom tob...@ringis.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545317
Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545317
Summary: test
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544957
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-12-08 01:21:46
EDT ---
Looks good to me thanks.
--
Configure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539134
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544957
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-12-08 02:42:46 EDT ---
2009/12/6 Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wolfgang.ruppre...@gmail.com
Roberto Ragusa m...@robertoragusa.it writes:
Joachim Backes wrote:
On 12/05/2009 01:32 PM, Hiisi wrote:
2009/12/5 Wolfgang S. Rupprechtwolfgang.ruppre...@gmail.com:
As of a day or so ago su has started hanging for 30
And I was just about to ask what exactly is broken downstream... :-)
I've been driving several Fedora versions on several machines for several
years now with a custom-partitioned disks (simple setups, typically just
swap, / and /home, no LVM or anything such), and nothing downstream
seemed
Mikkel wrote on 3-DEC-2009 17:48:43.76
On 12/03/2009 10:10 AM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
On 12/03/2009 10:46 AM, Mikkel wrote:
Have others run into the problem where the qmmp x86_64 update wants
to drag in a bunch of .i686 packages as dependencies when you try to
upgrade it? I already have all
Do you have two disparate grub.conf files?
I have only ever edited /boot/grub/menu.lst to alter how grub boots.
I do not know if this the correct thing to do but in doing so I 've not
had any problems.
Roger
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:05:07 +1100, Roger wrote:
Do you have two disparate grub.conf files?
I have only ever edited /boot/grub/menu.lst to alter how grub boots.
I do not know if this the correct thing to do but in doing so I 've not
had any problems.
Roger
/boot/grub/grub.conf is the
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 12:17 -0800, Dan Thurman wrote:
Again, rsync is a *Unix* utility, designed for *Unix* filesystems
*only*. If you'd said at the beginning that you wanted to move a
Vista
partition we could have saved ourselves a lot of time.
poc
I was being general. The same
Yes exactly!
2009/12/7 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:05:07 +1100, Roger wrote:
Do you have two disparate grub.conf files?
I have only ever edited /boot/grub/menu.lst to alter how grub boots.
I do not know if this the correct thing to do but in doing so I
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 00:53 +1100, Roger wrote:
Question: with /boot / and /home partitions, do /usr /etc /var and
others all go into directories in /
I've never found out how the partitioning and install systems handle
this.
As far as accessing them is concerned, they're all directories
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 00:05 +1100, Roger wrote:
I have only ever edited /boot/grub/menu.lst to alter how grub boots.
I do not know if this the correct thing to do
That should be fine. Do you have more than one boot partition?
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 10:56 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
/boot/grub/grub.conf is the configuration file
/boot/grub/menu.lst is just a symlink for compatibility
As I recall, that's a Red Hat-ism. The menu.lst file being the default
GRUB file, as used by GRUB, and grub.conf being the file
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 06:25 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
it seems whatever came out of xsane isn't compatible with the fax
viewer in XP.
Three guesses: It's a compressed TIFF, and the other computer doesn't
support that compression scheme. You saved a grayscale or full-colour
TIFF, and the
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 18:31 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
lp php-test.css
returns
lp: successful-ok
It's a CUPS bug. I've filed a bug report here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=545026
Thanks for saying about it.
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:59:03 +1030, Tim wrote:
/boot/grub/grub.conf is the configuration file
/boot/grub/menu.lst is just a symlink for compatibility
As I recall, that's a Red Hat-ism.
True.
The menu.lst file being the default
GRUB file, as used by GRUB,
Not true. The default
From Suvayu Ali (in the Getting rid of /boot thread)
Could you please point me to the documentation for this? I would
really like to read up more and understand what limitations/advantages
I might have as I have been waiting for this to be included since F10.
Sorry Suvayu. Just remembered that
Hi,
I launched a 'chkrootkit' on my mail server and it gave me the following
error :
Checking `bindshell'... INFECTED (PORTS: 465)
I think that isn't a problem because a use this port with postfix as SMTPS.
Am I right or wrong ?
BR
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
I've been trying to install Fedora-12 from a memory stick
to which I have transferred the KDE Live CD
using livecd-iso-to-disk .
The problem is that the ancient machine I am dealing with
does not support booting from the USB stick.
So following advice here, I transferred vmlinuz0 and initrd0.img
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:32:50 +0100 Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Hi,
I launched a 'chkrootkit' on my mail server and it gave me the following
error :
Checking `bindshell'... INFECTED (PORTS: 465)
I think that isn't a problem because a use this port with postfix as SMTPS.
Take it als false
I acquired another computer recently that has a Pentium(R) 4 D CPU Dual
core that is capable of hyper-threading.
I was not satisfied with its performance so I looked carefully at its
configuration and found that hyper-threading was disabled. A little more
looking and I noticed that
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:02:09 -0600
Aaron Konstam wrote:
A little more
looking and I noticed that hyper-threading was disabled in the BIOS and
could not be turned on.
Does that mean there is no BIOS option to turn it on, or that attempting
to turn it on in the BIOS doesn't work? I've run
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 00:05 +1100, Roger wrote:
Do you have two disparate grub.conf files?
I have only ever edited /boot/grub/menu.lst to alter how grub boots.
I do not know if this the correct thing to do but in doing so I 've not
had any problems.
Roger
Actually what you are doing is
Hi Tom,
2009/12/7 Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com
From Suvayu Ali (in the Getting rid of /boot thread)
Could you please point me to the documentation for this? I would
really like to read up more and understand what limitations/advantages
I might have as I have been waiting for this to be
Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 09:02 -0600 schrieb Aaron Konstam:
I acquired another computer recently that has a Pentium(R) 4 D CPU Dual
core that is capable of hyper-threading.
I was not satisfied with its performance so I looked carefully at its
configuration and found that hyper-threading
Sorry for top posting but one wonders what happens if you use lpr rather
than lp. Are we System V or Berkley. I just wonder.
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 18:31 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
I setup a remote lpd network attached printer using
system-config-printer. And it works ... sort of :-)
I
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 14:38:20 +0100, Frank wrote:
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:32:50 +0100 Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Hi,
I launched a 'chkrootkit' on my mail server and it gave me the following
error :
Checking `bindshell'... INFECTED (PORTS: 465)
I think that isn't a problem because a
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 10:11 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:02:09 -0600
Aaron Konstam wrote:
A little more
looking and I noticed that hyper-threading was disabled in the BIOS and
could not be turned on.
Does that mean there is no BIOS option to turn it on, or that
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 16:18 +0100, Joerg Bergmann wrote:
Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 09:02 -0600 schrieb Aaron Konstam:
I acquired another computer recently that has a Pentium(R) 4 D CPU Dual
core that is capable of hyper-threading.
I was not satisfied with its performance so I looked
I know with every new version of Fedora problems arise and I don't want
to minimize the importance of problems people are having with F12.
But again as with the installation of F11 the installation of F12 went
for me like a charm. Configurations of the system that used to have me
cursing and
Aaron Konstam on 12/07/2009 09:38 AM wrote:
Thanks that makes sense. For your information the current Intel XEON
processors use hyperthreading productively. However, Intel lists this
CPU as one where hyper-threading is available but as you say it may not
be productive.
Xeons are nothing more
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 16:18 +0100, Joerg Bergmann wrote:
The problem of the Pentium 4 D: It is not really a dual core one.
Hyper-Threading means: There is one core with two execution paths, which
means some of the common CPU features, but not all, are present twice.
One feature in
Once upon a time, Greg Woods wo...@ucar.edu said:
One feature in particular that is not present twice is some of the
caching. This is sort of why they named it hyperthreading. If you can
get multiple threads of the same process, sharing the same memory, to
run simultaneously, there is a
Greetings.
This is a regular posting every monday,
letting people know about the upcoming IRC classroom sessions that are
scheduled.
From the Classroom page at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Classroom
we currently have the following Classes scheduled:
2009-12-08 02:00 UTC How to report
Hi guys,
has anyone tried to play with Gnome Zeitgeist? Any hints or list of
dependencies?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
On 12/04/2009 01:33 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
On Friday 04 December 2009 14:55, Eric Brunson wrote:
According to it's website documentation grub has supported LVM for the
past few minor releases. Is there any initiative to move /boot in LVM?
Wondering,
e.
Sure would be a good thing,
On 12/07/2009 04:15 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 00:05 +1100, Roger wrote:
Do you have two disparate grub.conf files?
I have only ever edited /boot/grub/menu.lst to alter how grub boots.
I do not know if this the correct thing to do but in doing so I 've not
had any problems.
On Monday 07 December 2009, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I've been trying to install Fedora-12 from a memory stick
to which I have transferred the KDE Live CD
using livecd-iso-to-disk .
The problem is that the ancient machine I am dealing with
does not support booting from the USB stick.
So following
On Monday 07 December 2009, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 14:38:20 +0100, Frank wrote:
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:32:50 +0100 Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Hi,
I launched a 'chkrootkit' on my mail server and it gave me the
following error :
Checking `bindshell'... INFECTED (PORTS: 465)
On 12/04/2009 04:56 PM, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Eric Brunsonbrun...@brunson.com wrote:
According to it's website documentation grub has supported LVM for the past
few minor releases. Is there any initiative to move /boot in LVM?
Can't imagine there's any
After running 12 for some weeks now, I allowed yum to install the newest kernel
(well, as of Friday of course).
all seemed to go just fine until I rebooted. All the machine will do is
continue to reboot itself over and over again.
I reinstalled and applied only updates other then 3 that
Is there a plugin in nautilus to show me the date/size of a file?
thanks in advance,
henrique
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
sorry a little bit in a hurry,
show me before I overwrite the file, if they have the same name.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Henrique Koesjan hkoes...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a plugin in nautilus to show me the date/size of a file?
thanks in advance,
henrique
--
fedora-list mailing
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Henrique Koesjan hkoes...@gmail.com wrote:
show me before I overwrite the file, if they have the same name.
Why would you need a plugin to do what Nautilus does by default?
--
Marc Wilson
m...@cox.net
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Chris rac...@makeworld.com wrote:
Currently, I tossed on Ubuntu just so I can get some work done however, would
really prefer to be back running F12.
Other than that it let you make a snarky Ubuntu remark, why would you
need to replace F12 just so that you can
2009/12/7 Henrique Koesjan hkoes...@gmail.com:
Is there a plugin in nautilus to show me the date/size of a file?
thanks in advance,
henrique
No plugins are required, just turn on detailed list view. :)
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
--
fedora-list mailing list
-Original Message-
From: Marc Wilson [mailto:m...@cox.net]
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2009 01:37 PM
To: 'Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.'
Subject: Re: Latest Kernel causes reboot hell
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Chris rac...@makeworld.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 20:07 +, Chris wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marc Wilson [mailto:m...@cox.net]
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2009 01:37 PM
To: 'Community assistance, encouragement,and advice for using Fedora.'
Subject: Re: Latest Kernel causes reboot hell
On Mon, Dec 7,
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 09:44 -0700, Greg Woods wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 16:18 +0100, Joerg Bergmann wrote:
The problem of the Pentium 4 D: It is not really a dual core one.
Hyper-Threading means: There is one core with two execution paths, which
means some of the common CPU features, but
Since I updated to kernel-2.6.31.6-162.fc12.i686 on my EeePC 1000
netbook, Wifi has become so unreliable as to be virtually unusable. Lost
connections, dropped frames even when pinging the local AP, endless
browswer waits while Resolving host The same AP supports 1 iMac,
a Mac Mini, 3 laptops
Hi;
Not a crisis -- I am just futzing about looking at the hardware on my
machine using command line commands.
Is there a way to confirm my hard disks have been formatted with an LBA
(logical block accessing) scheme rather than CHS? Actually I am pretty
sure they have been. I was just
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Rick Stevens ri...@nerd.com wrote:
On 12/07/2009 12:24 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since I updated to kernel-2.6.31.6-162.fc12.i686 on my EeePC 1000
netbook, Wifi has become so unreliable as to be virtually unusable. Lost
connections, dropped frames even
I just wanted to add my recent experience with the new F12 kernel
A couple of days ago, I had a PF in my area (due to the snowstorm, I
imagine). My F12 machine (the one *not* on a UPS, yet) remained down
for a couple of days.
This morning, noting last night's updates, I rebooted it (so I
On 12/07/2009 12:39 PM, William Case wrote:
Hi;
Not a crisis -- I am just futzing about looking at the hardware on my
machine using command line commands.
Is there a way to confirm my hard disks have been formatted with an LBA
(logical block accessing) scheme rather than CHS? Actually I am
On Monday 07 December 2009 15:24:59 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since I updated to kernel-2.6.31.6-162.fc12.i686 on my EeePC 1000
netbook, Wifi has become so unreliable as to be virtually unusable. snip .
The chipset is an AR928x. Had anyone else seen this? I'll BZ if
necessary.
Hello,
Yes,
Patrick O'Callaghan on 12/07/2009 02:24 PM wrote:
Had anyone else seen this? I'll BZ if
necessary.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538792
Upstream says to use the latest version of the driver as they won't
backport changes. The latest version of the driver still doesn't work
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 10:06 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Aaron Konstam on 12/07/2009 09:38 AM wrote:
Thanks that makes sense. For your information the current Intel XEON
processors use hyperthreading productively. However, Intel lists this
CPU as one where hyper-threading is available
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 09:44 -0700, Greg Woods wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 16:18 +0100, Joerg Bergmann wrote:
The problem of the Pentium 4 D: It is not really a dual core one.
Hyper-Threading means: There is one core with two execution paths, which
means some of the common CPU
On 09-12-07 15:51:38, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
...
I just went to reboot it. Since I wasn't logged into the console, I
used the GDM reboot button to reboot the system. While it was
shutting down, it just hung. That's when I noticed the caps-lock and
scroll-lock leds flashing in unison.
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 22:16 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 09:44 -0700, Greg Woods wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 16:18 +0100, Joerg Bergmann wrote:
The problem of the Pentium 4 D: It is not really a dual core one.
Hyper-Threading means: There is one core with two
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 17:25 -0500, KC8LDO wrote:
I have a problem with F11 not browsing file shares on other machines. I can
browse file shares on the F11 box from other computers however just fine.
When I try to browse file shares, using Nautilus, on the LAN I can see
several machines out
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 19:27 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 12/07/2009 04:15 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 00:05 +1100, Roger wrote:
Do you have two disparate grub.conf files?
I have only ever edited /boot/grub/menu.lst to alter how grub boots.
I do not know if this
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 12:38 -0800, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 12/07/2009 12:24 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since I updated to kernel-2.6.31.6-162.fc12.i686 on my EeePC 1000
netbook, Wifi has become so unreliable as to be virtually unusable. Lost
connections, dropped frames even when pinging
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 12:41 -0800, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Rick Stevens ri...@nerd.com wrote:
On 12/07/2009 12:24 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since I updated to kernel-2.6.31.6-162.fc12.i686 on my EeePC 1000
netbook, Wifi has become so unreliable as to
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 15:57 -0500, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
On Monday 07 December 2009 15:24:59 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since I updated to kernel-2.6.31.6-162.fc12.i686 on my EeePC 1000
netbook, Wifi has become so unreliable as to be virtually unusable. snip .
The chipset is an
Dear All,
Have you noticed this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545043
?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 16:42 -0500, William Hooper wrote:
As far as I can tell both cores have their separate 1M cache. But
lshw-gui reports HT is supported
You might want to check out this blog post by Dave Jones:
2009/12/7 Paul Smith phh...@gmail.com:
Dear All,
Have you noticed this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545043
Nope. Just updated and rebooted to check:
[...@samlap ~]$ uname -a
Linux samlap.fireburst.co.uk 2.6.31.6-162.fc12.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 4
00:06:26 EST 2009 x86_64
Gene Heskett wrote:
Timothy Murphy wrote:
I've been trying to install Fedora-12 from a memory stick
to which I have transferred the KDE Live CD
using livecd-iso-to-disk .
snip
I wouldn't mind being able to do something similar myself. I have an
8Gb stick with the F12 install iso on it, as a
Hi,
just installed F12[*], and every now and then abrt pops up saying some app
misbehaved and asks me to report the problem. I always do so (3 bugs so far
in only 2 days using F12), but it sometimes generates *huge* coredump files
on /var/cache/abrt/*/ (Firefox alone generated a 359M file,
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 20:48, Andre Costa blue...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
just installed F12[*], and every now and then abrt pops up saying some app
misbehaved and asks me to report the problem. I always do so (3 bugs so far
in only 2 days using F12), but it sometimes generates *huge* coredump
Chris writes:
After running 12 for some weeks now, I allowed yum to install the newest kernel (well, as of Friday of course).
all seemed to go just fine until I rebooted. All the machine will do is continue to reboot itself over and over again.
I reinstalled and applied only updates other
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:06:12 -0500
Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
Chris writes:
After running 12 for some weeks now, I allowed yum to install the
newest kernel (well, as of Friday of course).
all seemed to go just fine until I rebooted. All the machine will
do is
Chris writes:
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:06:12 -0500
Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
Some time ago, in F9-F10 era, there was a consecutive series of about
four kernels that were released that could not boot on one of my
machines. Somehow, I managed to survive this traumatic
We've been running on Thunderbird 3, beta 4 for a while now. The
current beta release is RC2, released on 12/1. Is the plan to stay on
beta 4 until the release of version 3 or will the updates repo pick up
the release candidates?
--
Steve
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
1 - 100 of 557 matches
Mail list logo
