Hi,
I'm trying to run mutliple commands from the command line while using
nohup. But I can't seem to get the syntax right, can someone please
correct this for me
nohup cmd 1;cm2;cmd3
All i get is that cmd1 runs from wiht nohup but the rest run in my
current shell. I'd like all to be run with
On 30Oct2009 09:42, Dan Track dan.tr...@gmail.com wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I'm trying to run mutliple commands from the command line while using
| nohup. But I can't seem to get the syntax right, can someone please
| correct this for me
|
| nohup cmd 1;cm2;cmd3
|
| All i get is that cmd1 runs from wiht
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
On 30Oct2009 09:42, Dan Track dan.tr...@gmail.com wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I'm trying to run mutliple commands from the command line while using
| nohup. But I can't seem to get the syntax right, can someone please
| correct
Hi Dan,
On Friday 30 October 2009 03:11 AM, Dan Track wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Cameron Simpsonc...@zip.com.au wrote:
On 30Oct2009 09:42, Dan Trackdan.tr...@gmail.com wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I'm trying to run mutliple commands from the command line while using
| nohup. But I can't
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 08:02 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi Dan,
On Friday 30 October 2009 03:11 AM, Dan Track wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Cameron Simpsonc...@zip.com.au wrote:
On 30Oct2009 09:42, Dan Trackdan.tr...@gmail.com wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I'm trying to run mutliple
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 10:35 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Screen is not an option if you want to set up a long-running job and log
out.
Why not? That's the first thing I think of when I want to do just that.
'at' also works to start a job not connected to a terminal.
--
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 14:19 -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 10:35 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Screen is not an option if you want to set up a long-running job and log
out.
Why not? That's the first thing I think of when I want to do just that.
You're right.
Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 10:35 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Screen is not an option if you want to set up a long-running job and log
out.
Why not? That's the first thing I think of when I want to do just that.
I concur. That is one of the main reasons screen
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Rick Stevens ri...@nerd.com wrote:
Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 10:35 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Screen is not an option if you want to set up a long-running job and log
out.
Why not? That's the first thing I think of when I want to
Hi Patrick,
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 08:02 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote:
I often find nohup very unreliable. I have had jobs fail submitted with
nohup. I was thinking of switching to using screen. Maybe you could give
that a try?
Screen is not an option if you want to
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 03:38:34PM -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi Patrick,
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 08:02 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote:
I often find nohup very unreliable. I have had jobs fail submitted with
nohup. I was thinking of switching to using screen. Maybe you
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 15:38 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi Patrick,
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 08:02 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote:
I often find nohup very unreliable. I have had jobs fail submitted with
nohup. I was thinking of switching to using screen. Maybe you could
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 14:24 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
Whoops! In my previous comment on this, I neglected to mention you
really need to run /etc/rc.d/rc with the desired runlevel to force the
/etc/rc.d/rcX.d stuff to go. In other words, if you do telinit 3,
Bradley wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 14:24 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
Whoops! In my previous comment on this, I neglected to mention you
really need to run /etc/rc.d/rc with the desired runlevel to force the
/etc/rc.d/rcX.d stuff to go. In other words, if you do
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 12:56 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
Bradley wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 14:24 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
Whoops! In my previous comment on this, I neglected to mention you
really need to run /etc/rc.d/rc with the desired runlevel to
Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 12:56 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
Bradley wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 14:24 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
Whoops! In my previous comment on this, I neglected to mention you
really need to run /etc/rc.d/rc with the desired
Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 12:56 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
Bradley wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 14:24 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
Whoops! In my previous comment on this, I neglected to mention you
really need to run
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 14:16 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
AFAIK, telinit does NOT fire up the /etc/rc.d stuff by itself and that's
how the K* and S* stuff get run.
As has been pointed out what you say is not true. Changes runlevel
should cause the correct rc* files to run. Check the man page
Chris Tyler wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 14:16 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
AFAIK, telinit does NOT fire up the /etc/rc.d stuff by itself and that's
how the K* and S* stuff get run.
As has been pointed out what you say is not true. Changes runlevel
should cause the correct rc* files to run.
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 15:30 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
I believe you and yes, it does work. Doesn't explain why daemons that
should be shut down aren't. I'll have to investigate this further.
That would depend on what each individual script is doing.
poc
--
fedora-list mailing list
Aldo Foot wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay,
I am starting to do some more advanced automated maintenance on my
system but can't find a nifty way to do something and was wondering if
anyone out there can help me with this. I am configuring
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the input but, unfortunately, this doesn't give the results
that I need.
I gave up and configured one of the run levels for doing the needed
tasks and have the system reboot into that run level where it does what
I
Bradley wrote:
Aldo Foot wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay,
I am starting to do some more advanced automated maintenance on my
system but can't find a nifty way to do something and was wondering if
anyone out there can help me with this.
Bradley wrote:
Aldo Foot wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay,
I am starting to do some more advanced automated maintenance on my
system but can't find a nifty way to do something and was wondering if
anyone out there can help me with this. I
Bradley wrote:
Instead of rebooting, you could use telinit to change the run level.
It will stop/start services as necessary to match the configuration
for that run level.
Mikkel
Actually, I tried that but for some reason telinit doesn't work
correctly. It doesn't shut down or start
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of rebooting, you could use telinit to change the run level.
It will stop/start services as necessary to match the configuration
for that run level.
Mikkel
Actually, I tried that but for some reason telinit doesn't
Aldo Foot wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of rebooting, you could use telinit to change the run level.
It will stop/start services as necessary to match the configuration
for that run level.
Mikkel
Actually, I tried that but for some reason
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 14:24 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
Whoops! In my previous comment on this, I neglected to mention you
really need to run /etc/rc.d/rc with the desired runlevel to force the
/etc/rc.d/rcX.d stuff to go. In other words, if you do telinit 3,
then you should also do
Okay,
I am starting to do some more advanced automated maintenance on my
system but can't find a nifty way to do something and was wondering if
anyone out there can help me with this. I am configuring my system to
do an automated backup of all my data (2 to 4 hours per week) but need
it to
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay,
I am starting to do some more advanced automated maintenance on my
system but can't find a nifty way to do something and was wondering if
anyone out there can help me with this. I am configuring my system to
do an
30 matches
Mail list logo
