On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Packaging conventions and rules, I guess.
I like the idea of the Fedora music sig a lot, but it seems to be in a
half-half state. I realise I'm being ridiculously critical here, because I
haven't contributed. But it feels like it took the best
Hi Hector,
Hector Centeno wrote:
I support the idea of having newer versions of pakages in the CCRMA
repos that supersede the ones in the Fedora repos and also agree that
Fernando should get as many volunteers as possible to help him with
the packaging (myself I've been trying to make time for
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 07:42:02PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
I believe this is easily feasible given enough manpower, most ccrma packages
are pretty clean, they just need someone to push them through the review
process, then the biggest hurdle left is ... the rt-kernel.
Well since I
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 02:24:34PM -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 13:48 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Hans de Goede wrote:
Well since I seem to be talking to the right person now, I know you hate
this
question, but ...
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 02:40:04PM -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
All this said, I personally haven't hit any issues with things like MIDI in
Fedora where the -rt kernel would have helped me. Maybe my gear is
special,
but latency between me hitting a key on a synth and having
