With regards, to X code Tools 1.5. Should I install X code 1.2 first? I
gave it up some time ago, because I couldn't get the 'segments' stuff
to work (basically i just don't know what it is beyond segments of a CD
image.).
Best regards,
Steffen
On 8/8-2004, at 18.26, Martin Costabel wrote:
Steffen Lund Hokland wrote:
With regards, to X code Tools 1.5. Should I install X code 1.2 first? I
gave it up some time ago, because I couldn't get the 'segments' stuff to
work (basically i just don't know what it is beyond segments of a CD
image.).
You don't need 1.2 first, 1.5 is
At 16.46 -0400 04-08-06, Benjamin Reed wrote/04-08-06, 16.46 -0400
skrev Benjamin Reed
There is actually a bug that will cause all current versions of fink
(the program) to incorrectly not provide a versioned cctools
package, so a small number of packages won't compile.
It will be fixed in
david bonde wrote:
[]
make: gcc3: Command not found
make: *** [tree.o] Error 127
### execution of make failed, exit code 2
Failed: compiling tree-1.4b2-1 failed
gcc3 is removed on the machine I installed Xcode 1.5 on.
This is because you didn't install the gcc3.1.pkg. You should install
this
Does fink work with these? Should I upgrade? Does it matter?
tks,
jw
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
one more big change to
On Aug 6, 2004, at 4:30 PM, John Wiggins wrote:
Does fink work with these? Should I upgrade? Does it matter?
tks,
jw
I've not heard of any incompatibilities yet. If you're concerned, you
might wait a while before upgrading, to see if any issues have cropped
up.
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Fink
John Wiggins wrote:
Does fink work with these? Should I upgrade? Does it matter?
There is actually a bug that will cause all current versions of fink
(the program) to incorrectly not provide a versioned cctools package, so
a small number of packages won't compile.
It will be fixed in fink
