[Fink-devel] Re: experimental/rangerrick/10.4/main/finkinfo/x11 qt3.info,1.28,1.29 qt3.patch,1.30,1.31

2006-03-27 Thread Martin Costabel
Benjamin Reed wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/experimental/rangerrick/10.4/main/finkinfo/x11 In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv25855/10.4/main/finkinfo/x11 Modified Files: qt3.info qt3.patch Log Message: more misc updates, koffice 1.5 rc1 Index: qt3.info

[Fink-devel] Re: experimental/rangerrick/10.4/main/finkinfo/x11 qt3.info,1.28,1.29 qt3.patch,1.30,1.31

2006-03-27 Thread Benjamin Reed
Martin Costabel wrote: Before you move this from experimental to unstable, I'd like to remind you that with or without symlinks, this is *not* going to be compatible with any old package, as long as you change the install_name of the dylibs. I got bitten by this while I tried your

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: experimental/rangerrick/10.4/main/finkinfo/x11 qt3.info,1.28,1.29 qt3.patch,1.30,1.31

2006-03-27 Thread David R. Morrison
On Mar 27, 2006, at 5:25 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote: Martin Costabel wrote: Before you move this from experimental to unstable, I'd like to remind you that with or without symlinks, this is *not* going to be compatible with any old package, as long as you change the install_name of the

[Fink-devel] Re: New Build Results

2006-03-27 Thread Jordan Mantha
Michèle Garoche wrote: desktop-file-utils - changed since the build Builds fine for me bluefish-gnome2 - changed since the build, reported as building on Intel too now by David R. Morrison Builds fine for me and runs. devhelp - no change, but failure due to desktop-file-utils, so it

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: New Build Results

2006-03-27 Thread Daniel Johnson
On Mar 27, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Jordan Mantha wrote: devhelp - no change, but failure due to desktop-file-utils, so it should work, unless something else is not good Builds but doesn't run because of a problem with mozilla (and firefox) on Intels. I reported a bug (1459616) https://

[Fink-devel] Common splitoff for a package with variants

2006-03-27 Thread Max Horn
Hi folks, I was wondering: Is there any sane way to specify a common splitoff for a package with variants? The background for this questions it the polymake package on our package submission tracker https:// sourceforge.net/tracker/? func=detailatid=414256aid=1114201group_id=17203, but I

Re: [Fink-devel] Common splitoff for a package with variants

2006-03-27 Thread Daniel Macks
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 02:22:05AM +0200, Max Horn wrote: Hi folks, I was wondering: Is there any sane way to specify a common splitoff for a package with variants? There's no way to have a single .info that contains a splitoff that is less varianted than the parent. If a .info has