Max Horn wrote:
Hi folks,
tried to update to gtk+2-2.12.10-1 today, on my 10.5.3 machine. Well,
it fails:
i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1: /usr/X11/lib/libXrandr.2.0.0.dylib: No
such file or directory
So you still have the same problem you reported on the gnome-core list a
month ago,
Am Di, 24.06.2008, 10:21, schrieb Martin Costabel:
Max Horn wrote:
Hi folks,
tried to update to gtk+2-2.12.10-1 today, on my 10.5.3 machine. Well,
it fails:
i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1: /usr/X11/lib/libXrandr.2.0.0.dylib: No
such file or directory
So you still have the same problem you
Max Horn wrote:
[]
So, the missing symlink is indeed back (i.e. Apple has fixed the bug on
its part), but libtool is translating a -lXrandr to an explicit
/usr/X11/lib/libXrandr.2.0.0.dylib. I have not yet discovered why it does
that, though *sigh*.
Usually libtool takes what it finds in the
Hi,
I'm running the latest release of arb in leopard and encountering problems
when I try to create a pt_server. arb generates the following command in
the terminal...
Action: '($ARBHOME/bin/arb_pt_server -D/sw/share/arb/lib/pts/SSU_rRNA.arb
-T:3032) '
sh: /sw/share/arb/bin/arb_pt_server: No
On Tuesday 24 June 2008 08:47:48 Pat Schloss wrote:
Hi,
I'm running the latest release of arb in leopard and encountering problems
when I try to create a pt_server. arb generates the following command in
the terminal...
Action: '($ARBHOME/bin/arb_pt_server
On Jun 24, 2008, at 4:50 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Max Horn wrote:
[]
So, the missing symlink is indeed back (i.e. Apple has fixed the
bug on
its part), but libtool is translating a -lXrandr to an explicit
/usr/X11/lib/libXrandr.2.0.0.dylib. I have not yet discovered why
it does
that,
Let's keep a paper trail
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] arb can't find arb_pt_server
Date: Tuesday 24 June 2008
From: Pat Schloss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alexander Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, Alexander.
I got this to work -
sudo ln -s /sw/bin
Daniel Johnson wrote:
[]
I just checked the 10.5.3 combo updater and while it installs new
libxrandr.2.1.0.dylib and libxrandr.2.dylib, it does NOT install a new
libxrandr.la file. So the .la file still points to
libxrandr.2.0.0.dylib. Now the update SHOULDN'T delete
libxrandr.2.0.0.dylib
On Jun 24, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Daniel Johnson wrote:
[]
I just checked the 10.5.3 combo updater and while it installs new
libxrandr.2.1.0.dylib and libxrandr.2.dylib, it does NOT install a
new libxrandr.la file. So the .la file still points to libxrandr.
2.0.0.dylib.
Daniel Johnson wrote:
[]
I wonder if it's actually the xorg build system that is at fault here
rather than Apple. The macosforge package does the same thing. Of
course, if Apple had just included the updated .la file this wouldn't be
an issue. In any case, the results are headaches for Fink
Hi folks,
yeah, this sounds bad. My system indeed came with 10.5.2 preinstalled,
and the .la file is bad, just as Martin predicted. For now, instead of
creating a libXrandr.2.0.0.dylib symlink, I modified libXrandr.la to
use 2.1.0 instead of 2.0.0.
So probably not much we can do about
On Jun 24, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Max Horn wrote:
So probably not much we can do about this, other than praying Apple
will do something about it in 10.5.4.
How about filing a bug report? ;-)
- Koen.
-
Check out the new
12 matches
Mail list logo
