The code freeze for XFree86 4.3.0 will be any day now. I believe the
Mac OS X/Darwin part of the code base is pretty much in final form.
Benjamin put together a package in fink unstable which builds
something very close to the top of the tree. I would encourage as
many people as possible to
At 8:00 AM -0800 1/13/03, Ben Hines wrote:
On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 03:03 AM, Jakub Steiner wrote:
Hello there,
I noticed fink's GIMP package uses --no-shm --no-xshm because it's
broken. This is a call for help if anyone's interested/has some idle
cycles.
I don't think your shm will
At 1:59 PM -0500 1/12/03, David R. Morrison wrote:
Martin,
My understanding is that the following upgrade path:
XFree86-4.2 or Fink-4.2/ threaded-version / XFree86-4.3 or Fink-4.3
is expected to work just fine.
Yes. This kind of problem is why I got bent out of shape awhile ago
about Fink
At 9:25 PM +0100 1/6/03, Martin Costabel wrote:
Bruce Korb wrote:
Jeff Whitaker wrote:
Why force people to install xfree86-rootless if they
don't really need to?
Because is solves real, multi-hour problems. The cost is very
marginal: systems that need x-base and not x servers and their
At 3:14 PM -0600 11/4/02, Stephen Hocking wrote:
Has anyone in the XonX team sat down coded up the libGL stuff as a relatively
thin wrapper around Apple's native implementation?
(Probably not the ideal list for this question, but...)
Yes. TOT XFree86 CVS. :-)
--Torrey
The lesstif discussion reminded me that I should point out some
important changes that are coming soon for XFree86. The XonX project
will be releasing a bug fix update soonish to XFree86 from the 4.2
branch. In addition to fixing a few crashing bugs and adding Jaguar
compatibility, it will
At 4:17 PM -0400 5/31/02, David R. Morrison wrote:
Just to followup one more time: Torrey, we've had a bit more discussion
among fink developers on IRC, and it turns out that the problem which
Justin is having with xine is related to the lack of x-shm support on
Darwin. Somehow with the shared
