Re: [Fink-devel] Re: ppc unix binaries on Macintel?

2006-03-02 Thread Martin Costabel
Peter O'Gorman wrote: [] For anyone attempting this, I'd suggest looking at: http://darwinsource.opendarwin.org/tarballs/other/gcc_os-1819.tar.gz I have managed to build this using darwinbuild (on ppc, Build8G1165). It needed just the addition of f77 to build-gcc.sh which could probably be

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: ppc unix binaries on Macintel?

2006-03-01 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David R. Morrison wrote: | | On Feb 28, 2006, at 4:15 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: | | Chris, | I had been hoping that X11.app and Rosetta would have been | designed such that the X11 libs would be present in both binary | formats (intel and ppc) so

[Fink-devel] Re: ppc unix binaries on Macintel?

2006-02-28 Thread Jack Howarth
Chris, I've asked around on the darwin x11 mailing list and so far the answers suggest the worst. From what I have heard so far, the X11.app for Macintel doesn't provide a mechanism to transparently provide the ppc X11 libraries to ppc X11 executables so they don't run. So it appears that

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: ppc unix binaries on Macintel?

2006-02-28 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 28, 2006, at 5:34 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: Chris, I've asked around on the darwin x11 mailing list and so far the answers suggest the worst. From what I have heard so far, the X11.app for Macintel doesn't provide a mechanism to

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: ppc unix binaries on Macintel?

2006-02-28 Thread Jack Howarth
Chris, I had been hoping that X11.app and Rosetta would have been designed such that the X11 libs would be present in both binary formats (intel and ppc) so that pre-existing X11 ppc binaries could be run through Rosetta. That would have really smoothed the transition. Jack

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: ppc unix binaries on Macintel?

2006-02-28 Thread Daniel Johnson
On Feb 28, 2006, at 7:15 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: Chris, I had been hoping that X11.app and Rosetta would have been designed such that the X11 libs would be present in both binary formats (intel and ppc) so that pre-existing X11 ppc binaries could be run through Rosetta. That would have

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: ppc unix binaries on Macintel?

2006-02-28 Thread Martin Costabel
Jack Howarth wrote: Chris, I had been hoping that X11.app and Rosetta would have been designed such that the X11 libs would be present in both binary formats (intel and ppc) so that pre-existing X11 ppc binaries could be run through Rosetta. That would have really smoothed the transition.