Hi again,
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 05:51:23PM +0200, Jean-Fran?ois Mertens wrote:
On 22 Jun 2009, at 14:52, Daniel Johnson wrote:
Actually, libdevil1 is in fink unstable.
Right _ and graphviz(-shlibs) does link nicely with it :)
And I've got libgs
Hi again,
Comments below, in order:
Thanks for the feedback everyone.
There was also some discussion of creating a more minimalist variant
without all of the extension language bindings.
So how does the following sound?
graphviz-base (no x11, no language plug-ins, just dot and
David Fang wrote:
snip
There will be no dependencies between graphviz variants. graphviz-base
(whatever we name it) will have to conflict/replace other sibling
variants *unless* there is an easy and reliable way to separate out a
plug-in-only build/package (not via split-off b/c that would
Thanks for the feedback everyone.
There was also some discussion of creating a more minimalist variant
without all of the extension language bindings.
So how does the following sound?
graphviz-base (no x11, no language plug-ins, just dot and friends)
graphviz-nox (no x11, but with 'all'
David Fang wrote:
Thanks for the feedback everyone.
There was also some discussion of creating a more minimalist variant
without all of the extension language bindings.
So how does the following sound?
graphviz-base (no x11, no language plug-ins, just dot and friends)
graphviz-base
On 28/06/2009, at 19:22, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
David Fang wrote:
Thanks for the feedback everyone.
There was also some discussion of creating a more minimalist variant
without all of the extension language bindings.
So how does the following sound?
graphviz-base (no x11, no
monipol wrote:
On 28/06/2009, at 19:22, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
David Fang wrote:
Thanks for the feedback everyone.
There was also some discussion of creating a more minimalist variant
without all of the extension language bindings.
So how does the following sound?
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 04:58:56PM -0400, David Fang wrote:
Hi all,
After sensing a disturbance in the Source (reading my emails),
I've gathered that several people (myself included) find the current
graphviz package a little dependence-heavy. I'm considering writing a
Type: -nox
On Jun 22, 2009, at 4:36 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 04:58:56PM -0400, David Fang wrote:
Hi all,
After sensing a disturbance in the Source (reading my emails),
I've gathered that several people (myself included) find the current
graphviz package a little
On 22 Jun 2009, at 14:52, Daniel Johnson wrote:
Actually, libdevil1 is in fink unstable.
Right _ and graphviz(-shlibs) does link nicely with it :)
Jean-Francois
--
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open
Hi all,
After sensing a disturbance in the Source (reading my emails),
I've gathered that several people (myself included) find the current
graphviz package a little dependence-heavy. I'm considering writing a
Type: -nox variant, which I might need a little guidance with. I'm armed
11 matches
Mail list logo
