Jack Howarth wrote:
Oddly I see to see that when fink links liblam.0.0.0.dylib with gcc called
as gcc-4.0, I have...
gcc-4.0 -dynamiclib ${wl}-undefined ${wl}dynamic_lookup -o
.libs/liblam.0.0.0.dylib ...etc
whereas when I build lam 7.1.1 manually I end up with...
gcc -dynamiclib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Costabel wrote:
| This is strange also because the libtool calls in both cases seem
| identical...
|
| []
|
| It is curious that they produce such different linkages.
|
|
| Different libtool versions in /sw and in /usr?
|
Nope, setting
Hi,
I get an error with circular dependencies for gdk-pixbuf-shlibs:
...
gdk-pixbuf-shlibs gnome-print-shlibs
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -i /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-
powerpc/gnome/gdk-pixbuf-shlibs_0.22.0-10_darwin-powerpc.deb
Selecting previously
On 16 Nov 2005, at 23:48, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Peter: ... why JFM added the link to /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-
darwin8/4.0.0/libgcc.a to g77 in the first place, ...
I think it was added because of symbols which appear in Apple's
libgcc.a (maybe saveFP, restFP et. al.) but don't exist in
I do not have gdk-pixbuf installed! Is it part of gtk2?
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005.
On 11/19/05, Murali Vadivelu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not have gdk-pixbuf installed! Is it part of gtk2?
$ dlocate libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0.0.600.10.dylib
gtk+2-shlibs: /sw/lib/libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0.0.600.10.dylib
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Fink Documenter
[Day Job] Levitated Dipole
Peter,
Actually 'NoSetMACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET: true' is insufficient.
I had to resort to 'SetMACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET: 10.2' in order to
force libtool to use -undefined suppress. I'll post the packaging I
have into the fink tracking system later today. There also was a patch
I added to force
I have posted new gromacs and gromacs-mpi 3.3-1 packages on
the fink tracking system. While upgrading gromacs, I noticed that
the lammpi build for 7.1.1 needed fixing for fink packaging and
have posted 7.1.1-1 packaging which produces a working lamboot.
Lastly I have updated the fftw3 packages
I am trying to create a .info file for this package. However, at
compile stage I get this error from multiply defined symbol
PyarrayXXX. I have tried setting the LDFLAGS to mutliply_defined
suppress. It does not seem to work on either gcc-3.3 or 4.0.1. Any
help, please?
/bin/sh
I have posted three updated packages on the fink tracking system
for lammpi 7.1.1-1, fftw3-3.0.1-1 and gromacs/gromacs-mpi 3.3-1.
However I discovered afterwards that while the lam-7.1.1-1 package
has a working lamboot it seems to have broken the linking of gromacs-mpi.
I am now seeing errors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jack Howarth wrote:
| I have posted three updated packages on the fink tracking system
| for lammpi 7.1.1-1, fftw3-3.0.1-1 and gromacs/gromacs-mpi 3.3-1.
| However I discovered afterwards that while the lam-7.1.1-1 package
| has a working lamboot
Peter,
I have verified that the current gromacs-mpi packaging for 3.3-1 in
fink tracking builds fine against the lam-7.0.6-11 currently in unstable.
The problem seems to be specific to lam-7.1.1. With the lam-7.1.1-1
package installed (which was built with MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET 10.2),
I
darwin* | rhapsody*)
# PIC is the default on this platform
# Common symbols not allowed in MH_DYLIB files
lt_cv_prog_cc_pic='-fno-common'
This is already in there in configure file. Moreover, I have tried
setting the cfags in the .info file and still get exactly the same
Hi,
Hope this isn't too off-topic, but I'm having a simple problem with
current latex-3.0 in unstable (no answer on web?):
I've noticed that /sw/bin/latex is symlinked to pdfetex, which means that
'latex' produces only pdfs, never any DVI files (at least on all my
documents). If I need to
Begin forwarded message:
From: Murali Vadivelu
Date: 20 November 2005 03:47:32 am GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Scigraphica-devel] gcc-3.3 and gcc-4.0.1
Both give the same error:
gcc-3.3 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I. -I../scigraphica -Ipython -
I../pixmaps -I../scigraphica/widgets
Trevor Harmon wrote:
On Nov 19, 2005, at 6:09 PM, David Fang wrote:
I've noticed that /sw/bin/latex is symlinked to pdfetex, which means that
'latex' produces only pdfs, never any DVI files (at least on all my
documents).
I don't see why this should happen. I'm running tetex-base-3.0-1, and
16 matches
Mail list logo
