Re: [Fink-users] Dumb question about FinkCommander

2009-02-04 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:09 AM, Jerry wrote: In FinkCommander, why doesn't LyX (the word processor) appear in the list when I type LyX in the menu? The Fink web site reports lyx-mac 1.6.1-21. Jerry Do you have the unstable tree turned on?

Re: [Fink-users] Fink folder in /Applications

2009-02-04 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander Hansen wrote: On Feb 3, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote: On Feb 3, 2009, at 6:21 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: You should be safe to remove it. Any package that wants to create that should be able to do so. Hmm, it could be from Texshop: PostInstScript: if !

Re: [Fink-users] Dumb question about FinkCommander

2009-02-04 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Feb 4, 2009, at 5:04 AM, Jerry wrote: On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:02 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:09 AM, Jerry wrote: In FinkCommander, why doesn't LyX (the word processor) appear in the list when I type LyX in the menu? The Fink web site reports lyx-mac 1.6.1-21.

Re: [Fink-users] Can't Update libx264-shlibs with OS 10.4.11 Either

2009-02-04 Thread Martin Costabel
drjl...@netonecom.net wrote: I can't understand from notes by Martin et al -- is there some kind of workaround for this while the problem's being fixed? -- Jonathan My workaround is the following, based on the patch indicated by Ian Allison: Edit the file

[Fink-users] Can't Update libx264-shlibs with OS 10.4.11 Either

2009-02-04 Thread drjlevi
I can't understand from notes by Martin et al -- is there some kind of workaround for this while the problem's being fixed? -- Jonathan -- Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)

Re: [Fink-users] Dumb question about FinkCommander

2009-02-04 Thread Jerry
On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:02 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:09 AM, Jerry wrote: In FinkCommander, why doesn't LyX (the word processor) appear in the list when I type LyX in the menu? The Fink web site reports lyx-mac 1.6.1-21. Jerry Do you have the unstable tree turned

Re: [Fink-users] Can't Update libx264-shlibs with OS 10.4.11 Either

2009-02-04 Thread Stan Sanderson
On Feb 4, 2009, at 9:28 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: drjl...@netonecom.net wrote: I can't understand from notes by Martin et al -- is there some kind of workaround for this while the problem's being fixed? -- Jonathan My workaround is the following, based on the patch indicated by Ian

Re: [Fink-users] Can't Update libx264-shlibs with OS 10.4.11 Either

2009-02-04 Thread drjlevi
Martin, your script didn't work for some reason. I got the following message: Scanning package description files...WARNING: End of file reached during here-document in /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome/gtk+2.info. I'm attaching my amended version of the info file. Do you see

Re: [Fink-users] Texshop

2009-02-04 Thread Don Paul
The latest version (texshop-2.20-2) works fine for me. Many thanks. Now all I have to do is write the paper. Don On 4 Feb 2009, at 00:37, Martin Costabel wrote: Alexander Hansen wrote: [] PBXCp /sw/src/fink.build/root-texshop-2.20-1/sw/Applications/

Re: [Fink-users] Texshop

2009-02-04 Thread Don Paul
The latest version (texshop-2.20-2) works fine for me. Many thanks. Now all I have to do is write the paper. Don On 4 Feb 2009, at 00:37, Martin Costabel wrote: Alexander Hansen wrote: [] PBXCp /sw/src/fink.build/root-texshop-2.20-1/sw/Applications/

Re: [Fink-users] Can't Update libx264-shlibs with OS 10.4.11 Either

2009-02-04 Thread Martin Costabel
drjl...@netonecom.net wrote: Martin, your script didn't work for some reason. I got the following message: Scanning package description files...WARNING: End of file reached during here-document in /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome/gtk+2.info. I'm attaching my amended version