hi list,
what is the situation regarding tetex, and its porting to 10.8? is it likely
to happen soon?
it looks as if some latex packages have been ported already, like texlive,
while some others have not (among which tetex).
since i've been using tetex up to 10.6 and am now in the process
Hi,
At 19:01 +0100 on 2012-11-29 Jean-Francois Donati wrote:
what is the situation regarding tetex, and its porting to 10.8? is
it likely to happen soon?
I believe that teTeX has been dead for a long time.
or is it discontinued, in which case, which package is the closest
On 11/29/12 12:52 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote:
Hi,
At 19:01 +0100 on 2012-11-29 Jean-Francois Donati wrote:
what is the situation regarding tetex, and its porting to 10.8? is
it likely to happen soon?
I believe that teTeX has been dead for a long time.
or is it discontinued, in
texlive has replaced telex. It is a complete TeX package, with all of the
functionality of telex and more.
-- Dave
On Nov 29, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Jean-Francois Donati wrote:
hi list,
what is the situation regarding tetex, and its porting to 10.8? is it likely
to happen soon?
it
Hi!
tetex-base fails to compile on 10.5 and i386 every time I try to compile it:
===
building package tetex-base.
fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The
candidates:
(1) ghostscript: Interpreter for PostScript and PDF
(2) ghostscript-esp:
On 12/09/11 09:54, Mitar wrote:
[]
Could not resolve inconsistent dependencies!
Fink isn't sure how to install the above packages safely. You may be able to
fix things by running:
fink scanpackages
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install tetex-texmf=3.0-2
Did you try this?
--
Hi!
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
fink scanpackages
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install tetex-texmf=3.0-2
Did you try this?
Yes. And the next time the same things happens.
Mitar
On 12/09/11 12:04, Mitar wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Martin Costabelcosta...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
fink scanpackages
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install tetex-texmf=3.0-2
Did you try this?
Yes. And the next time the same things happens.
Could you give some
Dear All,
I need to install the pari-gp package.
Fink presents me the following choices
fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The
candidates:
(1)tetex-base: Base programs for a teTeX installation
(2)tetex-nox-base: Base programs for a teTeX
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/13/11 7:43 AM, Eduardo Pestana wrote:
Dear All,
I need to install the pari-gp package.
Fink presents me the following choices
fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual
dependency. The
candidates:
The binary file is out of date. You must reinstall building from source.
On Oct 27, 2010, at 7:46 AM, Rafael Poliseli Teles wrote:
Hi,
I've a problem with Finc when i try to install binary files of tetex-base.
What is wrong with my mac? or is it a problem of finc? Look at errors:
Peter,
As you've recognized, tetex is significantly out of date. There is a much more
recent TeX distribution called texlive which has recently been packaged for
Fink. If you need up-to-date versions of TeX packages, I recommend that.
So far, texlive is only available in the unstable tree.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/3/10 4:14 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Peter,
As you've recognized, tetex is significantly out of date. There is a much
more recent TeX distribution called texlive which has recently been packaged
for Fink. If you need up-to-date
PNM wrote:
[]
Should I install texlive or tetex? Is tetex becoming obsolete in favor
of texlive?
Tetex has been obsolete for several years.
--
Martin
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in
Peter Young wrote:
I just got a new MacPro, set it up, and installed some fink software,
but had trouble with tetex. I did the following
downloaded and installed fink
downloaded and installed finkcommander
ran selfupdate
ran update-all
downloaded binary version of tetex using
Alexander Hansen wrote:
snip
The binary tetex packages don't work properly now due to changes in some
of the system-installed stuff.
You'll need to install via source via the following sequence of commands:
1) Install Xcode 3.1.3
2) Run the following:
fink index -f
fink
Dear Alexander,
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Peter Young wrote:
I just got a new MacPro, set it up, and installed some fink software,
but had trouble with tetex. I did the following
downloaded and installed fink
downloaded and installed finkcommander
ran selfupdate
ran
On 27/08/2009, at 13:30, Peter Young wrote:
Dear Alexander,
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Peter Young wrote:
I just got a new MacPro, set it up, and installed some fink
software,
but had trouble with tetex. I did the following
downloaded and installed fink
downloaded
Dear monipol,
Hello, Peter. Maybe you need to run an extra selfupdate. Try following the
instructions available on the following FAQ entry:
http://www.finkproject.org/faq/upgrade-fink.php
Thanks for the info. I followed those instructions, i.e.
fink selfupdate
fink selfupdate-rsync
fink
Peter Young wrote:
Dear Alexander,
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Peter Young wrote:
I just got a new MacPro, set it up, and installed some fink software,
but had trouble with tetex. I did the following
downloaded and installed fink
downloaded and installed finkcommander
Peter Young wrote:
Dear monipol,
Hello, Peter. Maybe you need to run an extra selfupdate. Try
following the
instructions available on the following FAQ entry:
http://www.finkproject.org/faq/upgrade-fink.php
Thanks for the info. I followed those instructions, i.e.
fink selfupdate
fink
Dear Alexander,
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Peter Young wrote:
Dear Alexander,
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Peter Young wrote:
I just got a new MacPro, set it up, and installed some fink software,
but had trouble with tetex. I did the following
On Aug 27, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Peter Young wrote:
Dear Alexander,
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Peter Young wrote:
Dear Alexander,
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Peter Young wrote:
I just got a new MacPro, set it up, and installed some fink
software,
but
Dear Alexander,
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Peter Young wrote:
Dear monipol,
Hello, Peter. Maybe you need to run an extra selfupdate. Try
following the
instructions available on the following FAQ entry:
http://www.finkproject.org/faq/upgrade-fink.php
Thanks for the
Dear David,
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, David Reiser wrote:
On Aug 27, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Peter Young wrote:
Dear Alexander,
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Peter Young wrote:
Dear Alexander,
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Peter Young wrote:
I just got a new
Hi
I followed with interest the exchange about tetex. End of July I had
the same trouble to install tetex on a brand new system,
now OSX 10.5.8
~ fink --version
Package manager version: 0.29.2
Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Wed Jul 29 15:38:54 2009, 10.5,
i386
After several selfupdates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerfried Kumbartzki wrote:
Hi
I followed with interest the exchange about tetex. End of July I had
the same trouble to install tetex on a brand new system,
now OSX 10.5.8
~ fink --version
Package manager version: 0.29.2
Distribution version:
On 27/08/2009, at 17:17, Gerfried Kumbartzki wrote:
Hi
I followed with interest the exchange about tetex. End of July I had
the same trouble to install tetex on a brand new system,
now OSX 10.5.8
~ fink --version
Package manager version: 0.29.2
Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Wed Jul
Hi Alexander,
tulip:~ nm /sw/lib/libXm.3.dylib | grep ResCheck
001bd704 T __XmEditResCheckMessages
but xdvi is looking for __XEdit not __XmEdit.
The other command
tulip:~ fink dumpinfo -fallversion openmotif3-shlibs | grep bi | cut -f2
tulip:~
returned nothing. This is from fink
tulip:/sw/lib
On 27/08/2009, at 17:17, Gerfried Kumbartzki wrote:
I followed with interest the exchange about tetex. End of July I had
the same trouble to install tetex on a brand new system,
now OSX 10.5.8
~ fink --version
Package manager version: 0.29.2
Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Wed Jul 29
On 27/08/2009, at 18:07, Gerfried Kumbartzki wrote:
tulip:~ nm /sw/lib/libXm.3.dylib | grep ResCheck
001bd704 T __XmEditResCheckMessages
but xdvi is looking for __XEdit not __XmEdit.
The other command
tulip:~ fink dumpinfo -fallversion openmotif3-shlibs | grep bi | cut
-f2
tulip:~
monipol wrote:
On 27/08/2009, at 18:07, Gerfried Kumbartzki wrote:
tulip:~ nm /sw/lib/libXm.3.dylib | grep ResCheck
001bd704 T __XmEditResCheckMessages
but xdvi is looking for __XEdit not __XmEdit.
The other command
tulip:~ fink dumpinfo -fallversion openmotif3-shlibs | grep bi | cut
I just got a new MacPro, set it up, and installed some fink software,
but had trouble with tetex. I did the following
downloaded and installed fink
downloaded and installed finkcommander
ran selfupdate
ran update-all
downloaded binary version of tetex using finkcommander and got the
following
Gerfried Kumbartzki wrote:
Hi
On a brand new iMac OS X 10.5.7
after installing fink the next task was to install tetex. It failed
after a lot of texts output with
some thing like
/sw/bin/dpkg: error processing tetex-base (--install):
subprocess post-installation script returned error
Alexander Hansen wrote:
Gerfried Kumbartzki wrote:
Hi
On a brand new iMac OS X 10.5.7
after installing fink the next task was to install tetex. It failed
after a lot of texts output with
some thing like
/sw/bin/dpkg: error processing tetex-base (--install):
subprocess
On Jun 26, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Alexander Hansen wrote:
Gerfried Kumbartzki wrote:
Hi
On a brand new iMac OS X 10.5.7
after installing fink the next task was to install tetex. It failed
after a lot of texts output with
some thing like
/sw/bin/dpkg: error
Gerfried Kumbartzki wrote:
On Jun 26, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Alexander Hansen wrote:
Gerfried Kumbartzki wrote:
Hi
On a brand new iMac OS X 10.5.7
after installing fink the next task was to install tetex. It failed
after a lot of texts output with
some thing like
On a MacPro running 10.4.10, I am having some trouble installing an
update to gnuplot. I have deleted my previously installed LaTeX
installation to see if I could complete the build process (thinking
it was a conflict of some sort between tex distributions), but the
same problem persists.
paul fons wrote:
On a MacPro running 10.4.10, I am having some trouble installing an
update to gnuplot. I have deleted my previously installed LaTeX
installation to see if I could complete the build process (thinking
it was a conflict of some sort between tex distributions), but the
Hello,
just to let you know that teTeX has been moved to obsolete on CTAN:
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/systems/unix/
(in case that influences fink users and/or download links)
Mojca
--
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:24:08
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
just to let you know that teTeX has been moved to obsolete on CTAN:
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/systems/unix/
(in case that influences fink users and/or download links)
I don't think it matters immediately. The old URL is still working, it
is now simply
Hi,
I'm using the tetex package from fink.
I'm trying to use the font family arev, which I downloaded from tug.
I installed the files in my local texmf tree (~/Library/texmf),
and performed the actions described in the instructions:
% mktexlsr
% updmap --enable Map arev.map
I also had to
On 26 Aug 2006, at 11:56, Victor Shoup wrote:
Hi,
I'm using the tetex package from fink.
I'm trying to use the font family arev, which I downloaded from tug.
I installed the files in my local texmf tree (~/Library/texmf),
and performed the actions described in the instructions:
%
On Aug 26, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Kevin Horton wrote:
On 26 Aug 2006, at 11:56, Victor Shoup wrote:
Hi,
I'm using the tetex package from fink.
I'm trying to use the font family arev, which I downloaded from
tug.
I installed the files in my local texmf tree (~/Library/texmf),
and performed
On 27/8/2006 5:28 AM, Kevin Horton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thus:
If you install latex packages in your local tree, you need to issue a
sudo texhash to run the routines that tells latex about the new
stuff.
Actually, if you've only added stuff to ~/Library/texmf, then the sudo is
Hi,
Something happened recently to change my pdflatex' default paper size to
A4. It may have been the upgrade to tetex 3.0-2 from tetex 3.0-1, but I
can't be sure.
I have tried all manner of texconfig paper letter and texconfig-sys
paper letter commands, as well as running texconfig and
Hello,
I am looking to use iTeXMac, which states that I need teTeX. I found
this on the fink webpage, however the bundled package is no longer
present. Do you know if it will be back anytime soon or if the other
tetext packages are all that i need to run iTexMac. thanks for the
help
take
Joseph Connolly wrote:
Hello,
I am looking to use iTeXMac, which states that I need teTeX. I found
this on the fink webpage, however the bundled package is no longer
present. Do you know if it will be back anytime soon or if the other
tetext packages are all that i need to run iTexMac.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 7, 2005, at 1:53 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
You are confirming that there is a serious problem with the way
tetex (or at least Fink's tetex, but what I read on other mailing
lists, similar things happen on GWtex) handles its config files.
Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
[]
On Jun 7, 2005, at 1:53 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
You are confirming that there is a serious problem with the way tetex
(or at least Fink's tetex, but what I read on other mailing lists,
similar things happen on GWtex) handles its config files. I suspect
there
Martin Costabel wrote:
Thibaut Cousin wrote:
[]
On both systems, the latex command is a symlink to pdfetex. I didn't
change anything to the default installation.
This has nothing to do with the question whether it outputs dvi or pdf
by default. pdfetex is quite capable of producing dvi,
Jens Nöckel wrote:
While I was exploring differences in behavior between pdflatex and latex
yesterday, I noticed an inconsistency in
/sw/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
Where does this file come from? I don't see it in the recent tetex
packages. Is it possible that it is left over from an
On Jun 6, 2005, at 1:52 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Jens Nöckel wrote:
While I was exploring differences in behavior between pdflatex and
latex yesterday, I noticed an inconsistency in
/sw/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
Where does this file come from? I don't see it in the recent tetex
On Jun 6, 2005, at 4:48 PM, Jens Nöckel wrote:
On Jun 6, 2005, at 1:52 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Jens Nöckel wrote:
While I was exploring differences in behavior between pdflatex and
latex yesterday, I noticed an inconsistency in
/sw/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
Where does this file
Jens Nöckel wrote:
[]
It gets better: now I have one more updmap.cfg file on my machines with
fink dating from before Tiger, this time in
/sw/etc/texmf-config/web2c/updmap.cfg
[]
I decided to send this because it also contains an error message about a
missing map file 'antt.map' that I
Le Dimanche 5 Juin 2005 04:17, Brian J. Lopes a écrit :
I tried to install amarok, which apparently wanted to upgrade my tetex
installation.
So now I have followed all the tips given by fink to update my
tetex-base and tetex-texmf installations. It said to update tetex-texmf
then install
Brian J. Lopes wrote:
I tried to install amarok, which apparently wanted to upgrade my tetex
installation.
So now I have followed all the tips given by fink to update my
tetex-base and tetex-texmf installations. It said to update tetex-texmf
then install tetex-base. Well, after running
For me latex and pdflatex work fine on Tiger, just as they do on
Panther (with everything up to date).
So _fortunately_ the earlier message on latex being renamed to pslatex
(and latex becoming pdflatex) was not quite correct (that would just
have been crazy):
Typing latex still produces a dvi
Le Dimanche 5 Juin 2005 17:51, Jens Nöckel a écrit :
For me latex and pdflatex work fine on Tiger, just as they do on
Panther (with everything up to date).
So _fortunately_ the earlier message on latex being renamed to pslatex
(and latex becoming pdflatex) was not quite correct (that would
At 11:08 AM +0200 6/5/05, Thibaut Cousin wrote:
Maybe you should consider switching to pdf by default. I made that switch
three years ago and never looked back...
For the most part, I agree. Most of what I do (always with plain TeX,
not LaTeX), works quite well with pdftex. However, I
Le Dimanche 5 Juin 2005 20:48, Jonathan Levi MD a écrit :
For the most part, I agree. Most of what I do (always with plain TeX,
not LaTeX), works quite well with pdftex. However, I sometimes do
things with graphics in them, specifically using the pstricks
package. These do not work with
Thibaut Cousin wrote:
[]
On both systems, the latex command is a symlink to pdfetex. I didn't change
anything to the default installation.
This has nothing to do with the question whether it outputs dvi or pdf
by default. pdfetex is quite capable of producing dvi, and it does so by
default
I tried to install amarok, which apparently wanted to upgrade my tetex
installation.
So now I have followed all the tips given by fink to update my
tetex-base and tetex-texmf installations. It said to update tetex-texmf
then install tetex-base. Well, after running fink selfupdate, trying to
At 2:15 PM -0700 4/27/05, Remi Mommsen wrote:
Hi Dave,
I just found out that tetex-texmf 3.0-1 no longer includes the
legacy style psfig.sty. A package I maintain (CLHEP) still uses this
style for the documentation. I tried to replace it with epsfig.sty,
but this breaks documentation
On May 31, 2005, at 2:53 PM, Jonathan Levi, M.D. wrote:
I just found out that tetex-texmf 3.0-1 no longer includes the legacy
style psfig.sty. A package I maintain (CLHEP) still uses this style
for the documentation. I tried to replace it with epsfig.sty, but
this breaks documentation
fink is telling me this morning that my tetex-shlibs is out of date. I run
tetex 3.0-1 (a very nice package!) and have for a few months now. However,
tetex-shlibs is version 2.02. Looking at the info for it, it appears that it
uses some tetex3 features (like libkpathsea4). If it's version 3, could
I have tried building Tetex-base as well as ptex, and both of them
fail during the install build phase with the following output. I am
running Tiger. Let me know if more information is needed.
Thanks,
John
snip
making install in utils/dialog
/bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs
Hi Dave,
I just found out that tetex-texmf 3.0-1 no longer includes the legacy
style psfig.sty. A package I maintain (CLHEP) still uses this style for
the documentation. I tried to replace it with epsfig.sty, but this
breaks documentation creation, too. Anyway, before digging further into
it,
Hi Remi. I don't know anything about the decisions of what to include
in tetex; you might ask on the tetex lists.
List-Post: mailto:tetex@dbs.uni-hannover.de
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best,
Dave
---
SF.Net email is sponsored
This one doesn't seem related to freetype
[~/Projects/Teaching/preconditioners-594] %% fink install tetex-base
Information about 4741 packages read in 2 seconds.
The following package will be installed or updated:
tetex-base
The following additional package will be installed:
tetex-texmf
Do
On Mar 14, 2005, at 2:51 PM, Victor Eijkhout wrote:
This one doesn't seem related to freetype
[~/Projects/Teaching/preconditioners-594] %% fink install tetex-base
Information about 4741 packages read in 2 seconds.
The following package will be installed or updated:
tetex-base
The following
At 3:21 PM -0500 3/14/05, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Check out the relatively extensive thread starting at
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.general/16328
That did the trick. Thanks.
I did indeed install Lillypond, so we can blame it on that one.
--
Victor Eijkhout [EMAIL PROTECTED], 329
Hi,
I don't say it enough on this mailing list, but *thank you*.
I upgraded teTeX from 2.0.2 to 3.0 without a single problem. Not one.
Well, except that my ISP is flaky enough to make downloading 87MB files
way more trouble than it ought to be, but that's hardly fink's fault.
I did have to run
Hi,
Today, fink told me that there is a new tetex version. I did a
fink update-all, however, it failed. Odd enough, a new update-all
says that there is no package to be installed.
(Output file see attached below.)
Package manager version: 0.24.0
Distribution version: 0.7.1.rsync
Mac OS 10.3.8
I can't seem to get tetex-base to install. It builds fine, but always
fails in the PostInstScript at the line fmtutil --all with the error
fmtutil: format directory `/sw/var/lib/texmf/web2c' does not exist.
None of the tetex packages seem to create this directory. If I manually
create the
Thanks Remi,
Checking around, tetex is not installed anywhere else on the system.
Interestingly, system-tetex was a dependency of doxygen as I tried to
install it from binary. I think this might be a bug. Why it is calling
for system-tetex instead of installing tetex I can't figure out.
Again
I suggest sudo apt-get install tetex.
The apt-get program is accepting system-tetex as a valid alternative to
tetex, without realizing that you won't be able to install it. It
probably chooses system-tetex over tetex because s comes before t.
-- Dave
Looks like this is not a new topic to the group, but I'm still unable
to understand or solve the problem.
I am trying to install gnucash without compiling everything so I am
trying to install as many dependencies with apt-get as possible.
Here are the additional packages mentioned by fink
Hi Tom,
On Jan 1, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Tom Harris wrote:
Looks like this is not a new topic to the group, but I'm still unable
to understand or solve the problem.
I am trying to install gnucash without compiling everything so I am
trying to install as many dependencies with apt-get as possible.
hi there,
it seems to me that my last fink update-all has somehow broken my
tetex installation again:
when I launch xdvi I get the following error:
Xdvi Error:
Could not find config file xdvi.cfg in path
/sw/share/texmf/xdvi:/sw/var/lib/texmf/web2c:/sw/share/texmf/web2c -
disabling T1lib.
and
On 18 déc. 2003, at 14:56, Alexander Meier wrote:
hi there,
it seems to me that my last fink update-all has somehow broken my
tetex installation again:
when I launch xdvi I get the following error:
Xdvi Error:
Could not find config file xdvi.cfg in path
David Orlovich wrote:
./pl.l: In function `scan_string':
./pl.l:462: error: `yytext_ptr' undeclared (first use in this function)
./pl.l:462: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
./pl.l:462: error: for each function it appears in.)
It appears that the new flex I put in unstable
Hi Fink users. In addition to trying to get gnome on my Powerbook
running panther (see other thread about librep failing), I'm also
putting kde on my iMac (also running panther). Anyway in installing
bundle-kde, it fails while compiling tetex-2.0.2-32 with the following
output. Any ideas?
Recompiling tetex for Panther is slowly driving me crazy.
Has anyone had to *update* tetex from a 10.2/gcc-2.95 installation to a
10.3/gcc-3 installation? When I moved to panther, I did a selfupdate-cvs
(rsync wasn't working) for fink, then an update-all, for which it proceeded
to re-compile all
Has *anyone* been able to install tetex-base using fink under Panther?
Thanks,
Dan.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE
On Oct 29, 2003, at 4:14 PM, Daniel M. Bikel wrote:
Has *anyone* been able to install tetex-base using fink under Panther?
Yes.
JF Mertens
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more
Yes.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]% fink list -i tetex
Information about 1357 packages read in 1 seconds.
i tetex 2.0.2-22 Complete distribution of the TeX
typesetting system
i tetex-base 2.0.2-22 Base programs for a teTeX
installation
i tetex-shlibs
\On Monday, September 22, 2003, at 02:30 PM, Avram Aelony wrote:
tetex installed correctly but just for the heck of it I re-tried to
install lilypond ... unsucessfully.
fink install lilypond eventually crashes with ...
WARNING: Please consider installing optional programs: pktrace
mftrace
G'day,
I'm having trouble accessing mirrors with tetex. The following is
typical:
Downloading the file tetex-src-2.0.1.tar.gz failed.
(1) Give up
(2) Retry the same mirror
(3) Retry another mirror from your country
(4) Retry another mirror from your continent
(5) Retry another mirror
into fink's unstable
tree. You'll also find those if you run fink selfupdate-cvs.
-- Dave
From: John Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Fink-users] tetex mirrors
G'day,
I'm having trouble accessing mirrors with tetex. The following is
typical:
Downloading the file tetex
(Oops. I used reply instead of reply-all. Correcting that now,
sorry.)
On Monday, Mar 10, 2003, at 00:08 Australia/Melbourne, David R.
Morrison wrote:
tetex-2.0.1 was removed from the CTAN sites.
When that happened, I updated the fink tetex-2.0.1 files so that they
now
fetch the source
Having just installed and built tetex-2.0-5, I am having the same
problem reported earlier of not having a pdflatex command (although
pdftex -progname pdflatex does work, modulo other problems).
Following JF Merten's instructions, I tried:
do first a
dpkg -c
Thanks for your patience, I'm still getting all of the kinks worked out of
the new tetex.
The new tetex-base package installs a file /sw/share/doc/tetex-base/README.fink
which are the release notes Jean-Francois was referring to.
The pdflatex business will be smoother in the next version. For
Thanks for the quick response.
the best thing to do is fink remove pdftex
That didn't work, but fink purge pdftex did.
followed by fink reinstall
tetex-base, which will hopefully fix it.
Unfortunately it doesn't seem to make a difference.
I've got an older version of tetex installed on a
After some more tests, I can report that the problem seems to be with gv
and not with the various methods of generating pdf output in landscape
format.
The simplest method does work for any other viewer I've tried apart from
gv:
\documentclass[a4paper,landscape]{slides}
latex
dvips -t landscape
Has anyone successfully installed tetex-base 1.0-13 using the SDK for
Apple's X11 app?
Don
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
This probably isn't a problem with the fink side of the tetex
distribution, but since we are discussing it, I thought I'd try asking
anyway. I can get perfectly good landscape ps output from my latex
document, but I can't get landscape pdf output from it.
I'm on all the latest 2.0-5 tetex, and
On lundi, fév 17, 2003, at 14:22 Europe/Paris, Vivien Mary Kendon wrote:
This probably isn't a problem with the fink side of the tetex
distribution, but since we are discussing it, I thought I'd try asking
anyway. I can get perfectly good landscape ps output from my latex
document, but I can't
A way of getting the pdf in landscape format is to use the geometry
package in latex with the landscape option, i.e.
\usepackage[a4paper,landscape]{geometry}
Then use your same commands to produce the file Land.ps and then just
ps2pdf Land.ps. This should give Land.pdf in landscape format.
[Two replies in one here: Stefano see below]
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Martin Costabel wrote:
On lundi, fév 17, 2003, at 14:22 Europe/Paris, Vivien Mary Kendon wrote:
This probably isn't a problem with the fink side of the tetex
distribution, but since we are discussing it, I thought I'd try
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
