Re: [Fink-users] imagemagick's gnome dependencies

2008-01-16 Thread Daniel Macks
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 04:33:46PM -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote: > Aleix Conchillo Flaqu? wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2008 8:36 PM, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I don't think they will be installed. They are just compiled at the same > >> time as qt3; same sources and same comp

Re: [Fink-users] imagemagick's gnome dependencies

2008-01-16 Thread Alexander Hansen
Aleix Conchillo Flaqué wrote: > On Jan 16, 2008 8:36 PM, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I don't think they will be installed. They are just compiled at the same >> time as qt3; same sources and same compilation. >> >> > > If the package qt3-designer shows as a dependency I

Re: [Fink-users] imagemagick's gnome dependencies

2008-01-16 Thread Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
On Jan 16, 2008 8:36 PM, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think they will be installed. They are just compiled at the same > time as qt3; same sources and same compilation. > If the package qt3-designer shows as a dependency I think it will be compiled and installed. I can un

Re: [Fink-users] imagemagick's gnome dependencies

2008-01-16 Thread Martin Costabel
Jose A. Ortega Ruiz wrote: [] > Agreed. Also, I think there must be something amok with dependencies of > librsvg2/djvu, because (at least in my system) fink wants to install not > only libraries, but also application-level packages like qt3-designer or > qt3-linguist, and desktop support ones (gno

Re: [Fink-users] imagemagick's gnome dependencies

2008-01-16 Thread Jose A. Ortega Ruiz
Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In the case of ImageMagick, the GNOME dependency seems to be > "librsvg2" which requires lots of GNOME packages. But ImageMagick does > not require any GNOME libraries to work, so in my opinion it would be > better to have two packages: imagemag

Re: [Fink-users] imagemagick's gnome dependencies

2008-01-16 Thread Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
In the case of ImageMagick, the GNOME dependency seems to be "librsvg2" which requires lots of GNOME packages. But ImageMagick does not require any GNOME libraries to work, so in my opinion it would be better to have two packages: imagemagick (without the svg support) and an imagemagick-gno

Re: [Fink-users] imagemagick's gnome dependencies

2008-01-14 Thread Daniel Macks
You can 'fink show-deps PACKAGE' to see the immediate (explicit) dependencies of PACKAGE. I bet you'll find that the "problem" from your perspective is not wine itself (or imagemagick itself), which may have a small list of dependencies that all see reasonable. Rather, one of those innocuous-soundi

Re: [Fink-users] imagemagick's gnome dependencies

2008-01-14 Thread Pierre Bauduin
Hi there, Well some packages in unstable have "weird" or "funny" dependencies :) One such case is wine, look: $ fink install wine The following package will be installed or updated: wine The following 159 additional packages will be installed: arts arts-dev arts-shlibs audiofile audiofile-bin au

[Fink-users] imagemagick's gnome dependencies

2008-01-14 Thread Jose A. Ortega Ruiz
hi, i was about to install imagemagick on leopard from fink unstable, but, to my surprise, some of its depencies depend in turn on gnome libraries, with the result that it seems to need a lot of gnome stuff to compile... which sounds wrong to me. is this a known issue? cheers, jao -- If all els