Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On 3/9/06, Felix Ingrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must have missed the discussion on this, but is fink ready for
Intel based machine? are the current binaries release universal
already? or everything relies on Rosetta?
Thanks,
--
Felix
Currently
On 3/9/06, Felix Ingrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must have missed the discussion on this, but is fink ready for
Intel based machine? are the current binaries release universal
already? or everything relies on Rosetta?
Thanks,
--
Felix
Currently the Fink project plans NOT to
Excuse my potential misunderstanding, but does this mean there might be a
fink-intel and a separate fink-ppc release, or just that fink may have
more source trees (ppc vs. intel), as opposed to just those trees that are
differentiated by Mac OS X version(s) and stability?
Perhaps it simply
On 3/9/06, Matt Kozak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excuse my potential misunderstanding, but does this mean there might be a
fink-intel and a separate fink-ppc release, or just that fink may have
more source trees (ppc vs. intel), as opposed to just those trees that are
differentiated by Mac OS X
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:05 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On 3/9/06, Matt Kozak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excuse my potential misunderstanding, but does this mean there
might be a
fink-intel and a separate fink-ppc release, or just that fink may