Re: [Fink-users] Intel support and universal binaries...

2006-05-29 Thread Chuck Robey
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On 3/9/06, Felix Ingrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I must have missed the discussion on this, but is fink ready for Intel based machine? are the current binaries release universal already? or everything relies on Rosetta? Thanks, -- Felix Currently

Re: [Fink-users] Intel support and universal binaries...

2006-03-09 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 3/9/06, Felix Ingrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I must have missed the discussion on this, but is fink ready for Intel based machine? are the current binaries release universal already? or everything relies on Rosetta? Thanks, -- Felix Currently the Fink project plans NOT to

Re: [Fink-users] Intel support and universal binaries...

2006-03-09 Thread Matt Kozak
Excuse my potential misunderstanding, but does this mean there might be a fink-intel and a separate fink-ppc release, or just that fink may have more source trees (ppc vs. intel), as opposed to just those trees that are differentiated by Mac OS X version(s) and stability? Perhaps it simply

Re: [Fink-users] Intel support and universal binaries...

2006-03-09 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 3/9/06, Matt Kozak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Excuse my potential misunderstanding, but does this mean there might be a fink-intel and a separate fink-ppc release, or just that fink may have more source trees (ppc vs. intel), as opposed to just those trees that are differentiated by Mac OS X

Re: [Fink-users] Intel support and universal binaries...

2006-03-09 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:05 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On 3/9/06, Matt Kozak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Excuse my potential misunderstanding, but does this mean there might be a fink-intel and a separate fink-ppc release, or just that fink may